Abstract
This study describes the development of the ACD/Log P calculation method. Analysis of 14 calculation methods revealed that the most accurate calculations are obtained when correction factors are used. We evaluated the correction factors used by Hansch and Leo in CLOGP in order to simplify their method. Most of the CLOGP structural factors are included in our fragmental increments. Aliphatic and aromatic factors are replaced with additive interfragmental increments. Missing increments are estimated by two empirical equations with simple physical interpretation. The final method uses three simple equations with several types of parameters. The training set included 3601 compounds and the correlation between experimental and calculated Log P values gave R = 0.992, S = 0.21. The method was validated by comparing it with 17 other methods on various data sets of independently selected drugs and other compounds. In all cases, our method produced the best results. The weakness of this method is that it uses a large number of individual increments for aromatic interactions. Each increment represents a combination of several effects which presently cannot be separated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mannhold, R. and Dross, K., Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat., 15 (1996) 403.
Meylan, W. and Howard, P., J. Pharm. Sci., 84 (1995) 83.
Klopman, G., Li, J.-Y., Wang, S. and Dimayuga, M., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 34 (1994) 752.
Rekker, R.F. and Mannhold, R., Calculation of Drug Lipophilicity, VCH, Weinheim, 1992.
Chou, J. and Jurs, P.C., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 19 (1979) 172.
Leo, A., Jow, P.Y.C., Silipo, C. and Hansch, C., J. Med. Chem., 18 (1975) 865.
Hansch, C. and Leo, A., Substituent Constants for Correlation Analysis in Chemistry and Biology, Wiley, New York, NY, 1979.
Leo, A.J., Chem. Rev., 93 (1993) 1281.
Hansch, C., Leo, A. and Hoekman, D., Exploring QSAR. Hydrophobic, Electronic, and Steric Constants, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1995.
Nys, G.G. and Rekker, R.F., Chim. Ther., 8 (1973) 521.
Nys, G.G. and Rekker, R.F., Eur. J. Med. Chem., 9 (1974) 361.
Rekker, R.F., The Hydrophobic Fragmental Constant, Pharmacochemistry Library, Vol. 1, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1977.
Rekker, R.F. and de Kort, H.M., Eur. J. Med. Chem., 14 (1979) 479.
Viswanadhan, V.N., Ghose, A.K., Revankar, G.R. and Robins, R.K., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 29 (1989) 163.
Convard, T., Dubost, J.-P., Le Solleu, H. and Kummer, E., Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat., 13 (1994) 34.
Ghose, A.K. and Crippen, G.M., J. Comput. Chem., 7 (1986) 565.
Ghose, A.K. and Crippen, G.M., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 27 (1987) 21.
Ghose, A.K., Pritchett, A. and Crippen, G.M., J. Comput. Chem., 9 (1988) 80.
Suzuki, T. and Kudo, Y., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 4 (1990) 155.
Brickmann, J. and Waldherr-Teschner, M., Informationstechnik, 33 (1991) 83.
Kellogg, G.E. and Abraham, D., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 5 (1991) 545.
Ulmschneider, M., Ph.D. Thesis, University of Haute-Alsace, Mulhouse, France, 1993.
Palm, V.A., Quantitative Theory of Organic Reactions (Rus), Khimiya, Leningrad, 1977.
Rekker, R.F., ter Laak, A.M. and Mannhold, R., Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat., 12 (1993) 152.
Moriguchi, I., Hirono, S., Liu, Q., Nakagome, I. and Matsushita, Y., Chem. Pharm. Bull., 40 (1992) 127.
Moriguchi, I., Hirono, S., Nakagome, I. and Hirano, H., Chem. Pharm. Bull., 42 (1994) 976.
Viswanadhan, V.N., Reddy, M.R., Baccquet, R.J. and Erion, M.D., J. Comput. Chem., 14 (1993) 1019.
Bodor, N., Gabanyi, Z. and Wong, C.-K., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 111 (1989) 3783.
Bodor, N. and Huang, M.-J., J. Pharm. Sci., 81 (1992) 272.
Data from SciLogP Demo version, SciVision, Lexington, MA.
Martin, Y.C., Duban, M.E. and Bures, M.G., Calculating LogP: A Work-In-Progress, report on www.daylight.com/meetings/mug98/martin.
Leo, A.J., Chem. Pharm. Bull., 43 (1995) 512.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Petrauskas, A.A., Kolovanov, E.A. ACD/Log P method description. Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design 19, 99–116 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008719622770
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008719622770