Abstract
This paper covers three main areas : eliciting teachers' views of the nature of science; interpreting and understanding these views; and developing them in the context of initial or in-service teacher education. The three areas clearly overlap but we begin with eliciting : this section includes a look at ‘past probes’, and then presents the notion of ‘critical incidents’, with a range of examples. We argue throughout that critical incidents can be used partly as a means of probing teachers' views of science, but also have value as a tool for professional development. We then discuss interpreting and understanding teachers' responses to critical incidents, based on our research with over 300 teachers and student teachers who have worked with them. In the third section, on developing, we pursue the argument that teachers' understandings of the nature of science are located in their professional experience. We argue that if teachers' understandings are embedded within their professional practice this has important consequences for appropriate teacher education and professional development in the area of the nature of science.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Atkinson, P. and Delamont, S.: 1976, ‘Mock Ups and Cock Ups: the Stage Management of guided discovery instruction’ in M. Hammersley and P. Wood (eds.), The Process of Schooling, RKP, London.
Brickhouse, N.: 1989, ‘The teaching of the philosophy of science in secondary classrooms: case studies of teachers' personal theories’, International Journal of Science Education 11(4), 437–449.
Brickhouse, N.: 1990, ‘Teachers' Beliefs About the Nature of Science and Their relationship to Classroom Practice’, Journal of Teacher Education 41(3), 53–62.
DES/WO.: 1991, Science in the National Curriculum, HMSO, London.
Hewson, P. and Hewson, M.: 1989, ‘Analysis and use of a task for identifying conceptions of teaching science’, Journal of Education for Teaching 15(13), 191–209.
Hodson, D.: 1993, ‘Towards a more critical approach to practical work in school science’, Studies in Science Education 22, 85–142.
Kohn, S.: 1986, False Prophets: Error and deceit in science, Blackwell, Oxford.
Kouladis, V. and Ogborn, J.: 1989, ‘Philosophy of Science: an empirical study of teachers' views’, International Journal of Science Education 11(2), 173–184.
Kouladis, V. and Ogborn, J.: 1995, Science teachers Philosophical Assumptions: How Well do we Understand Them?, International Journal of Science Education 17(3), 273–283.
Lakin, S. and Wellington, J.: 1994, ‘Who will teach the nature of science?: Teachers' views of the nature of science and their implications for science education’, International Journal of Science Education 16(2), 175–190.
Lederman, N.: 1992, Teachers' and students conceptions of the nature of science: a review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29(4), 331–359.
Lucas, A.: 1975, ‘Hidden Assumptions in Measures of Knowledge about Science and Scientists, Science Education 59(4), 481–485.
Merton, R.K.: 1967, The institutional imperatives of science, in B. Barnes (ed.), Sociology of Science, Penguin, Harmondsworth 1971, 62–78.
Mulkay, M.: 1976, Norms and Ideology. in M. Mulkay (ed.) Sociology of Science: A Sociological Pilgrimage, Open University Press, Milton Keynes 1991, 62–78.
Nott, M. and Smith, R.: 1995, Talking Your Way out of it, Rigging and Conjuring: What Science Teachers do When Practicals Go Wrong, International Journal of Science Education 17(3), 399–410.
Nott, M. and Wellington, J.: 1993, ‘Your Nature of Science: an activity for science teachers’ School Science Review 75(270), 109–112.
Nott, M. and Wellington, J.: 1995a, Critical Incidents in the Science Classroom and the Nature of Science, School Science Review 76(276), 41–46.
Nott, M. and Wellington, J.: 1995b. Critical Incidents in Science. Open University, Milton Keynes (Science Document 14 in the Teaching Science in Secondary Schools series).
Nott, M. and Wellington, J.: 1996a, Probing Teachers Views of the Nature of Science: How Should we Do It and Where Should We Be Looking?, in G. Welford, J. Osborne and P. Scott (eds.), Research in Science Education in Europe, Falmer Press, London, 283–294.
Nott, M. and Wellington, J.: 1996b, When the Black Box Springs Open: Practical Work in School Science and the Nature of Science, International Journal of Science Education 18(7), 807–818.
Nott, M. and Wellington, J.: 1996c, Are We Getting the Bunsens out Today?: Learning and Teaching about Science in Everyday laboratory Life, School Science Review 77(281), 100–103.
Schün, D.: 1983, The Reflective Practitioner, Holt Rinehart, New York.
Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S.: 1985, Leviathan and the Air Pump, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Solomon, J.: 1990, A Report on the Implementation of Attainment Targets, Oxford University, Department of Educational Studies.
Solomon, J.: 1991, Teachers' Perceptions of the Strategies to be used for Teaching the Nature of Science, Oxford University, Department of Educational Studies.
Wellington, J.: 1981, ‘“What's supposed to happen, sir?”’ Some problems with discovery learning, School Science Review 63(222), 167–173.
Wellington, J.(ed.): 1986, Controversial Issues in the Curriculum, Blackwell, Oxford.
Wolpert, L.: 1993, The Unnatural Nature of Science, Faber and Faber, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nott, M., Wellington, J. Eliciting, Interpreting and Developing Teachers' Understandings of the Nature of Science. Science & Education 7, 579–594 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008631328479
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008631328479