Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial and Temporal Ecology of Native and Introduced Fish Larvae in Lower Putah Creek, California

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For two years we studied the distribution and abundance of native and introduced fish larvae in Putah Creek (Yolo County, CA), a low elevation regulated stream. We used light traps and conical drift nets to sample the fish larvae at two spatially separated sites from March through July 1997 and at four sites from February through August 1998. Native larvae occurred both earlier in the year and in higher abundance than those of introduced species. Both native larvae and overall numbers of larvae were more abundant at upstream sites in both years. Sampling of larvae appeared to be sensitive to the detection of rare species. Drift nets and light traps collected similar numbers of larvae, but each method tended to select for different taxa. There were significant trends in diel patterns of abundance, with more fish larvae being found during the hours of darkness. We suggest that differences between the sites were due to habitat changes resulting from an upstream dam that has created a refuge of diverse habitat and cool flowing water for native taxa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Brown, A.V. & M.L. Armstrong. 1985. Propensity to drift downstream among various species of fish. J. Freshw. Ecol. 3: 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J.G., V.A. Lamarra & R.J. Ryel. 1986. Drift of larval fishes in the upper Colorado River. J. Freshw. Biol. 3: 567–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childs, M.R., R.W. Clarkson & A.T. Robinson. 1998. Resource use by larval and early juvenile native fishes in the Little Colorado River, Grand Canyon, Arizona. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 127: 620–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrow, R., A.V. Zale & R.W. Gregory. 1990. Distribution and abundance of early life stages of fishes in a Florida lake dominated by aquatic macrophytes. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 119: 521–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copp, C.H. 1997. Microhabitat use of fish larvae and 0Cjuveniles in a highly regulated section of the River Great Ouse. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 13: 267–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, W.A. & A. J. Cordone. 1997. History and status of introduced fishes in California, 1871–1996. California Department of Fish and Game, Fish Bull. 178. 414 pp.

  • Floyd, K.B., R.D. Hoyt & S. Timbrook. 1984. Chronology of appearance and habitat partitioning by stream larval fishes. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 113: 217–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadomski, D.M. & C.A. Barfoot. 1998. Diel and distributional abundance patterns of fish embryos and larvae in the lower Columbia and Deschutes rivers. Env. Biol. Fish. 51: 353–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, B.C. 1991a. Interaction of abiotic and biotic factors influences larval fish survival in an Oklahoma stream. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 48: 1476–1480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, B.C. 1991b. Interactions among streamfishes: predationinduced habitat shifts and larval survival. Oecologia. 87: 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kissick, L.A. 1993. Comparison of traps lighted by photochemicals or electric bulbs for sampling warm water populations of young fish. North Amer. J. Fish. Manag. 13: 864–867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, M.P. 1999a. Ecological effects of non-native fish species in low elevation streams of the Central Valley, California. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California Davis, Davis. 84 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, M.P. 1999b. An experimental study of competition between the native Sacramento perch (Archoplites interruptus) and introduced bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus). Biological Invasions 1: 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mount, J.F. 1995. California rivers and streams. University of California Press, Berkeley. 359 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, P.B. 2000. Inland fishes of California, 2nd edition. University of California Press. Berkeley (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, P.B. & J.J. Cech, Jr. 1996. Fishes: an introduction to ichthyology, 3rd edition. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River. 590 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, P.B., M.P. Marchetti, J. Baldridge & T.L. Taylor. 1998. Fish health and diversity: justifying instream flows. Fisheries 23(7): 6–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, P.B. & M. P. Marchetti. 1998. Applications of Indices of Biotic Integrity to California streams and watersheds. pp. 367–380. In: T.P. Simpson (ed.) Assessing the Sustainability and Biological Integrity of Water Resource Quality Using Fish Assemblages, CRC Press, Boca Raton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, P.B., J.J. Smith, R.A. Daniels & D.M. Baltz. 1982. A review. pp. 227–256. In: C.H. Hand, G.L. Hunt, P.B. Moyle & J.L. Patton (ed.) Distribution and Ecology of Stream Fishes of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Drainage System, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, P.B. & J.E. Williams. 1990. Biodiversity loss in the temperate zone: decline of the native fish fauna of California. Cons. Biol. 4: 275–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, G., M. Horn, J. Kahl, T. Burke & P. Marsh. 1993. Use of larval light traps to capture razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus) in lake Mohave Arizona-Nevada. Southwestern Naturalist 38: 399–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M.S. & S.J. Vander Kooy. 1995. Phenology and spatial and temporal distribution of larval fishes in a partially channelized warmwater stream. Ecol. Freshw. Fish. 4: 93–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A.T., R.W. Clarkson & R.E. Forrest. 1998. Dispersal of larval fishes in a regulated river tributary. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 127: 772–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S.T. 1991. Mechanisms structuring stream fish assemblages: are there lessons from introduced species? Env. Biol. Fish. 30: 359–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M.T. & L.A. Nielsen. 1989. Young fish distribution in backwaters and main-channel borders of the Kanawha River, West Virginia. J. Fish Biol. 35: (supplement A): 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R.R. & F.J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry, 3rd edition. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York. 887 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, E.M., P.B. Moyle & T.C. Foin. 1992. Interactions between stochastic and deterministic processes in stream fish community assembly. Env. Biol. Fish. 36: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, E.M. 1995. Pattern and process in stream fish community organization: field study and simulation modeling. PhD. Dissertation, University of California Davis, Davis. 146 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, T.F., J.C. Trexler, G.L. Miller & K.E. Toyer. 1994. Temporal and spatial dynamics of larval and juvenile fish abundance in a temperate floodplain river. Copeia 1994: 174–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J.V. & J.A. Stanford. 1979. Ecological factors controlling stream zoobenthos with emphasis on thermal modification of regulated streams. pp. 35–55. In: J.V. Ward & J.A. Stanford (ed.) The Ecology of Regulated Streams, Plenum Press, Boca Raton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J.V. & J.A. Stanford. 1983. The serial discontinuity concept of lotic ecosystems. pp. 29–42. In: T.D. Fontaine & S.M. Bartell (ed.) Dynamics of Lotic Ecosystems, Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J.V. & J.A. Stanford. 1995. The serial discontinuity concept: extending the model to floodplain rivers. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 10: 159–168.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marchetti, M.P., Moyle, P.B. Spatial and Temporal Ecology of Native and Introduced Fish Larvae in Lower Putah Creek, California. Environmental Biology of Fishes 58, 75–87 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007676228910

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007676228910

Navigation