Abstract
We advance and subsequently test the proposition thatmarkets for fine art are rational, namely, that, inthe determination of price, traders make use of allrelevant art historical and critical information, asrevealed by hedonic content analysis, as well as allinformation on authenticity of the works offered forsale. If true, the proposition has consequences forpublic policy. Museums optimize choices among art historicallysignificant authentic paintings distributed asstochastic rare events in the tertiary market for art. Such paintings have few, if any, art historicallyequivalent substitutes, causing the demand for suchworks of art to be extremely inelastic. Museums tendto buy at the top of the information curve; payingprices which exceed market averages for similar art. As a result, society pays the cost of institutionalrisk aversion. In contrast, collectors often purchaseart before all art historical information is complete,and often earn a reward for assuming a risk due toincomplete information (Singer, 1991; Pomerhene, 1994).Collectors who can borrow to accumulate the highestcategory art can consume the services of their artcollection at zero cost. Stochastic transferfunctions fitted to time series of sales volume at thetwo top international auction houses confirm thehypothesis that the highest category of art is a quasisubstitute for financial instruments (liquid wealth).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnason, H.H. (1975) History of Modern Art. Abrams, New York.
Chanel, Oliver (1995) “Is Art Market Behavior Predictable?”. European Economic Review 39: 519–527.
Chanel, Oliver, Gerard-Varet, Louis-Andre and Ginsburgh, Victor (1996) “The Relevance of Hedonic Price Indices, The Case of Paintings”. Journal of Cultural Economics 20: 1–24.
Enders, Walter (1995) Applied Econometric Time Series.Wiley, New York.
Ginsburgh, V., Jeanfils, P. (1995) “Long-Term Comovements in International Markets for Paintings”. European Economic Review 39: 538–548.
Goepel, Erhard and Goepel, Barbara (1976) Katalog Der Gemaelde Max Beckman.Thyssen Stiftung, Kornfeld.
Goetzmann, William N. (1993) “Accounting for Taste: Art and the Financial Markets over Three Centuries”. American Economic Review 83(5): 1370–1376.
Kasa, K. (1992) “Common Stochastic Trends in International Stock Markets”. Journal of Monetary Economics 29: 95–124.
Pesando, James (1993) “Art as an Investment: The Market for Modern Prints”. American Economic Review 83(5): 1075–1089.
Pommerehne, Werner W. (1994) “The Effect of Public Purchases of Paintings on Auction Prices”. Paper presented at the 8th International Congress on Cultural Economics in Witten, Germany, 24–27 August.
Singer, Leslie P. (1991) “Optimum Management of Museum Acquisitions: A Normative Model”, in Francois Colbert and Clare Mitchell, eds, Proceedings, First International Conference on Art Management. École des Hautes Études Commerciales De Montreal.
Singer, Leslie P. and Lynch, Gary A. (1994) “Public Choice in the Tertiary Art Market”. Journal of Cultural Economics 18: 199–216.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singer, L.P., Lynch, G.a. Are Multiple Art Markets Rational?. Journal of Cultural Economics 21, 197–218 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007447326729
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007447326729