Skip to main content
Log in

Are Multiple Art Markets Rational?

  • Published:
Journal of Cultural Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We advance and subsequently test the proposition thatmarkets for fine art are rational, namely, that, inthe determination of price, traders make use of allrelevant art historical and critical information, asrevealed by hedonic content analysis, as well as allinformation on authenticity of the works offered forsale. If true, the proposition has consequences forpublic policy. Museums optimize choices among art historicallysignificant authentic paintings distributed asstochastic rare events in the tertiary market for art. Such paintings have few, if any, art historicallyequivalent substitutes, causing the demand for suchworks of art to be extremely inelastic. Museums tendto buy at the top of the information curve; payingprices which exceed market averages for similar art. As a result, society pays the cost of institutionalrisk aversion. In contrast, collectors often purchaseart before all art historical information is complete,and often earn a reward for assuming a risk due toincomplete information (Singer, 1991; Pomerhene, 1994).Collectors who can borrow to accumulate the highestcategory art can consume the services of their artcollection at zero cost. Stochastic transferfunctions fitted to time series of sales volume at thetwo top international auction houses confirm thehypothesis that the highest category of art is a quasisubstitute for financial instruments (liquid wealth).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnason, H.H. (1975) History of Modern Art. Abrams, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanel, Oliver (1995) “Is Art Market Behavior Predictable?”. European Economic Review 39: 519–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanel, Oliver, Gerard-Varet, Louis-Andre and Ginsburgh, Victor (1996) “The Relevance of Hedonic Price Indices, The Case of Paintings”. Journal of Cultural Economics 20: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, Walter (1995) Applied Econometric Time Series.Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburgh, V., Jeanfils, P. (1995) “Long-Term Comovements in International Markets for Paintings”. European Economic Review 39: 538–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goepel, Erhard and Goepel, Barbara (1976) Katalog Der Gemaelde Max Beckman.Thyssen Stiftung, Kornfeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetzmann, William N. (1993) “Accounting for Taste: Art and the Financial Markets over Three Centuries”. American Economic Review 83(5): 1370–1376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasa, K. (1992) “Common Stochastic Trends in International Stock Markets”. Journal of Monetary Economics 29: 95–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesando, James (1993) “Art as an Investment: The Market for Modern Prints”. American Economic Review 83(5): 1075–1089.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pommerehne, Werner W. (1994) “The Effect of Public Purchases of Paintings on Auction Prices”. Paper presented at the 8th International Congress on Cultural Economics in Witten, Germany, 24–27 August.

  • Singer, Leslie P. (1991) “Optimum Management of Museum Acquisitions: A Normative Model”, in Francois Colbert and Clare Mitchell, eds, Proceedings, First International Conference on Art Management. École des Hautes Études Commerciales De Montreal.

  • Singer, Leslie P. and Lynch, Gary A. (1994) “Public Choice in the Tertiary Art Market”. Journal of Cultural Economics 18: 199–216.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singer, L.P., Lynch, G.a. Are Multiple Art Markets Rational?. Journal of Cultural Economics 21, 197–218 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007447326729

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007447326729

Navigation