Skip to main content
Log in

Concurrent Exposure Assessments of Atrazine and Metolachlor in the Mainstem, Major Tributaries and Small Streams of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed: Indicators of Ecological Risk

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goals of this study were to: (1) measure atrazine and metolachlor concentrations during both high and low use periods in the Chesapeake Bay's mainstem/major tributaries, smaller tributaries and representative small agricultural streams during 1995 and 1996; (2) compare these exposure data with toxicity benchmarks for each herbicide to predict ecological risk and (3) use in-stream fish community data collected in the streams to provide supportive data for ecological risk characterization. Spatially, atrazine (<0.10–98 μg/L) and metolachlor (<0.10–68 μg/L) concentrations were highest in the streams, followed by the small tributaries (<0.10–11 μg/L atrazine; <0.10–8.6 μg/L metolachlor) with the lowest concentration in the mainstem Bay/larger tributaries (<0.10–0.22 μg/L atrazine; <0.10–0.24 μg/L metolachlor). Temporally, concentrations of both herbicides were greatest in all three types of habitats in the late spring and early summer. Concentrations of atrazine and metolachlor were very low or non-detectable in all habitats sampled from early August to mid-April. Toxicity benchmarks of 20 μg/L for atrazine based on an ecological No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) for microcosm/mesocosm studies and an acute 10th percentile of 53 μg/L for metolachlor (protection of ninety % of the species) based on laboratory toxicity data were selected to assess annual and seasonal ecological risk. Both of these toxicity benchmarks were conservative estimates of ecological risk designed to protect the trophic group (plants) most sensitive to these herbicides. Based on a comparison of these toxicity benchmarks with two years of exposure data, the ecological risk from both atrazine and metolachlor exposure in the mainstem Chesapeake Bay/large tributaries, small tributaries and representative agriculturally dominated streams was generally judged to be low. During one 72-h stream rain event in 1995, the atrazine toxicity benchmark (20 μg/L) was exceeded during part of the event. However, long-term permanent ecological effects are not expected based on the documented recovery potential of the most sensitive trophic group (plant communities) to the concentrations of atrazine reported and the transient nature of the atrazine pulses. Fish communities at the stream sites receiving the highest concentrations of both herbicides were judged to be healthy based on an Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) developed for Maryland's coastal plain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blankenship, K.: 1997, ‘1996 wettest year on record for flows to Chesapeake’, Bay Journal 7, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (Chesapeake Executive Council): 1989, Chesapeake Bay Toxics Reduction Strategy’, Chesapeake Bay Agreement Commitment Report, Chesapeake Bay Liaison Office, Annapolis, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, L. W. Jr., Fischer, S. A., Killen, W. D., Ziegenfuss, M. C., Anderson, R. D. and Klauda, R. J.:1992, 1991 doser study in Maryland coastal plain: Use of lime doser to mitigate stream acidification, Report CBRM-AD-93-6, Chesapeake Bay Research and Monitoring Program, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, L. W. Jr., Killen, W. D. Scott, M. C. Kilian, J. and Speir, C.: 1966, The 1995 Maryland Biological Stream Survey in two coastal plain rivers basins, Report, Chesapeake and Watershed Assessment Administration, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, L. W. Jr., Scott, M. C. Killen, W. D. and Anderson, R. D.: 1995, A pilot study to evaluate biological, physical, chemical and land-use characteristics in Maryland coastal plain streams, Final Report CBRM-AD-95-8, Chesapeake Bay Research and Monitoring Division, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, L. W. Jr., Fischer, S. A. Killen, W. D., Scott, M. C., Ziegenfuss, M. C. and Anderson, R. D.: 1994, Pilot study to evaluate biological, physical, chemical and land-use characteristics in Maryland coastal plain streams, Final report CBRM-AD-94-1, Chesapeake Research and Monitoring Division, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, L. W. Jr., Anderson, R. D. and Kilian, J.: 1997, Monitoring of atrazine and metolachlor in the mainstem, major tributaries and small streams of the Chesapeake Bay watershed: Implications for ecological risk, Final Report, University of Maryland, Wye Research and Education Center, Queenstown, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. E., Kroll, R. B., Pait, A. S. and Plimmer, J. R.: 1994, in S. Nelson and P. Elliot (eds), The Occurrence and Distribution of Pesticides in the Chesapeake Bay, 1994, Advance in Estuarine Sciences, Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee, Chesapeake Bay Program, CRC Pub. No. 147, Annapolis, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R., Toth, A. and Dudley, D. R.: 1985, ‘Fish communities of midwestern rivers: A history of degradation’, Bioscience 35, 90–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, R. B. and Murphy, D. L.: 1994, Pilot monitoring for 14 pesticides in Maryland surface waters, Report CBT/TRS 106/94, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chesapeake Bay Program, Annapolis, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maryland Office of Planning: 1991, Maryland's land 1973 – 1990 A changing resource, Publication 91–8, Office of State Planning, Baltimore, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC): 1994, Aquatic risk assessment and mitigation dialogue group, Final report, SETAC Foundation for Environmental Education, Pensacola, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, K. R., Baker, D. B., Richards, R. P., Dixon, K. R., Klaine, S. J., LaPoint, T. M., Kendall, R. J., Weiskopf, C. P., Giddings, J. M., Giesey, J. P., Hall, L. W. Jr. and Williams, M.: 1996, ‘Ecological risk assessment of atrazine in North American surface waters’, Environ. Tox. Chem. 15, 31–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, K. R. and Chappel, M. J.: 1996, An ecological risk assessment of metolachlor residues found in various surface water locations, Draft Report, Novartis Crop Protection, Greensboro, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratton, G. E.: 1984, ‘Effects of the herbicide atrazine and its degradation products, along and in combination on phototrophic microorganisms’, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 13, 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency): 1991, Chesapeake Bay Toxics of Concern List, Report prepared by the Chesapeake Bay Program Toxics Subcommittee's Living Resources Subcommittee's Joint Criteria and Standards Workgroup, Annapolis, Maryland.

  • U.S. EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency): 1992, Framework for ecological risk assessment, EPA/630/R92/001, Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, DC.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lenwood W. Hall Jr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hall, L.W., Anderson, R.D., Kilian, J. et al. Concurrent Exposure Assessments of Atrazine and Metolachlor in the Mainstem, Major Tributaries and Small Streams of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed: Indicators of Ecological Risk. Environ Monit Assess 59, 155–190 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006188923956

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006188923956

Navigation