Skip to main content
Log in

Factors affecting Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and regeneration of sweet orange and citrange

  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Epicotyl explants of sweet orange and citrange were infected with Agrobacterium strain EHA101 harboring binary vector pGA482GG, and factors affecting the plant regeneration and transformation efficiency were evaluated. Increasing the wounded area of explants by cutting longitudinally into two halves, and optimization of inoculation density, dramatically enhanced both regeneration and transformation frequency. Inclusion of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) in the explant pretreatment medium and the co-culture medium improved the transformation efficiency by decreasing the escape frequency. More than 90% rooting frequency of transformed citrange shoots was achieved by two-step culture: first on media supplemented with auxins, and then on media without hormones. Inclusion of 20 mg l−1 kanamycin in rooting medium efficiently discriminated transformed shoots from non-transgenic escaped shoots. Shoot grafting in vitro was used to regenerate transformed plants, due to the slow growth of most sweet orange shoots.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • An G, Watson BD, Stachel S, Gordon MP & Nester EW(1985) New cloning vehicles for transformation of higher plants. EMBO J. 4: 277–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond JE & Roose ML (1998) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of the commercially important citrus cultivar Washington navel orange. Plant Cell Rep. 18: 229–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervera M, Pina J, Juárez J, Navarro A, Navarro L & Peña L (1998) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of citrange: factors af-fecting transformation and regeneration. Plant Cell Rep. 18: 271–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng XX, Grosser JW & Gmitter FG (1992) Intergeneric somatic hybrid plants from protoplast fusion of Fortunella crassifolia cultivar 'Meiwa’ with Citrus sinensis cultivar 'Valencia'. Sci. Hortic. 49: 55–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez A, Guerri J, Cambra M, Navarro L, Moreno P & Peña L (2000) Efficient production of transgenic citrus plants expressing the coat protein gene of citrus tristeza virus. Plant Cell Rep. 19: 427–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, GH, Olivares-Fuster O, Del-Bosco S & Grosser JW (2000) An alternative method for the genetic transformation of sweet orange. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant 36: 450–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghorbel R, Juárez J, Navarro L & Peña L (1999) Green fluorescent protein as a screenable marker to increase the efficiency of generating transgenic woody fruit plants. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99: 350–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez-E MA, Luth D & Moore GA (1997) Factors affecting Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in Citrus and production of sour orange (Citrus aurantium L.) plants expressing the coat protein gene of citrus tristeza virus. Plant Cell Rep. 16: 745–753

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan MC & McHughen A (1988) Glyphosate tolerant flax plants from Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer. Plant Cell Rep. 7: 281–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneyoshi J, Kobayashi S, Nakamura Y, Shigemoto N & Doi Y (1994) A simple and efficient gene transfer system of trifoliate orange. Plant Cell Rep. 13: 541–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Luth D & Moore G (1999) Transgenic grapefruit plants obtained by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult 57: 219–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore GA, Jacono CC, Neidigh JL, Lawrence SD & Cline K (1992) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Citrus stem explants and regeneration of transgenic plants. Plant Cell Rep. 11: 238-242

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T & Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol. Plant 15: 473–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowska TK, Cranston HJ & Dyer WE (1995) Factors influencing Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation and regeneration of the safflower cultivar 'Centennial'. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 40: 85–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Peña L, Cervera M, Juárez J, Ortega C, Pina JA, Durán-Vila N & Navarro L (1995a) High efficiency Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and regeneration of citrus. Plant Sci. 104: 183-191

    Google Scholar 

  • Peña L, Cervera M, Juárez J, Navarro A, Pina JA, Durán-Vila N & Navarro L (1995b) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sweet orange and regeneration of transgenic plants. Plant Cell Rep. 14: 616–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Peña L, Cervera M, Juárez J, Navarro A, Pina JA & Navarro, L (1997) Genetic transformation of lime (Citrus aurantifolia Swing.): factors affecting transformation and regeneration. Plant Cell Rep. 16: 731–737

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Fritsch EF & Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang ZN, Ingelbrecht IL, Louzada E, Skaria M & Mirkov TE (2000) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of the commercially important grapefruit cultivar Rio Red (Citrus paradisi Macf.) Plant Cell Rep. 19: 1203–1211

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao JL, Wu JH, Gleave AP & Morris BAM (1996) Transformation of citrus embryogenic cells using particle bombardment and production of transgenic embryos. Plant Sci. 113: 175–183

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fred G. Gmitter Jr..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, C., Huang, S., Chen, C. et al. Factors affecting Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and regeneration of sweet orange and citrange. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 71, 147–155 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019983107509

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019983107509

Navigation