Skip to main content
Log in

Tumor characteristics and survival of breast cancer patients in relation to premorbid diet and body size

  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nutritional factors have been suggested to play an important role in the prognosis of breast cancer through their effect on tumor characteristics. This study evaluated four tumor characteristics and prognosis in relation to premorbid diet and body size. From a cohort of 89,835 women in the National Breast Screening Study (NBSS) in Canada, data on 676 incident cases of invasive carcinoma of breast, on whom we had dietary information, were used. A high energy intake lowered the likelihood of being ER positive and PR positive but after adjusting for ER status, was still associated with a higher risk of dying of breast cancer. Total fat and various types of fats were associated with a greater likelihood that a woman would be ER and PR positive, however the likelihood of dying from breast cancer was higher with higher fat consumption. There was no significant effect of higher intakes of beta carotene or vitamin C on ER status, nodal status or tumor size, but a significantly lower risk of dying from breast cancer was observed. Higher intake of carbohydrates and calcium was associated with a lowered frequency of ER and PR positive status but also with a lower risk of dying. Of the five indicators of body size studied, higher triceps skinfold thickness was associated with a slightly lower chance of being ER positive, PR positive, and node negative, and a significantly higher likelihood of dying. It appears that while there are significant associations between some of the diet and body size variables and tumor characteristics, the effect of most nutritional factors on prognosis in breast cancer may not be mediated via their effect on tumor characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Verreault R, Brisson J, Deschenes L, Naud F, Meyer F, Belanger L: Dietary fat in relation to prognostic indicators in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 80: 819–825, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  2. Verreault R, Brisson J, Deschenes L, Naud F: Body weight and prognostic indicators in breast cancer. Modifying effect of estrogen receptors. Am J Epidemiol 129: 260–268, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper JA, Rohan TE, Cant EL, Horsfall DJ, Tilley WD: Risk factors for breast cancer by oestrogen receptor status: a population-based case-control study. Br J Cancer 59: 119–125, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hislop TG, Band RR, Deschamps M, Ng V, Coldman AJ, Worth AJ, Labo T: Diet and histologic types of benign breast disease defined by subsequent risk of breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 131: 263–270, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  5. Holm LE, Callmer E, Hjalmar ML, Lidbrink E, Nilsson B, Skoog L: Dietary habits and prognostic factors in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 81: 1218–1223, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goodwin PJ, Boyd NF: Body size and breast cancer prognosis: a critical review of the evidence. Breast Cancer Res Treat 16: 205–214, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hebert JR, Augustine A, Barone J, Kabat GC, Kinne DW, Wynder EL: Weight, height and body mass index in the prognosis of breast cancer: Early results of a prospective study. Int J Cancer 42: 315–318, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ewertz M, Gillanders S, Meyer L, Zedeler K: Survival of breast cancer patients in relation to factors which affect the risk of developing breast cancer. Int J Cancer 49(4): 526–530, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  9. Coates RJ, Clark WS, Eley JW, Greenberg RS, Huguley CM Jr, Brown RL: Race, nutritional status, and survival from breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 82(21): 1684–1692, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  10. Suissa S, Pollak M, Spitzer WP, Margolese R: Body size and breast cancer prognosis: A statistical explanation of the discrepancies. Cancer Res 49: 3113–3116, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tretli S, Haldorsen T, Ottestad L: The effect of pre-morbid height and weight on the survival of breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 62(2): 299–303, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  12. Williams G. Howell A, Jones M: The relationship of body weight to response to endocrine therapy, steroid hormone receptors and survival of patients with advanced cancer of the breast. Br J Cancer 58: 631–634, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nomura AM, Marchand LL, Kolonel LN, Hankin JH: The effect of dietary fat on breast cancer survival among Caucasian and Japanese women in Hawaii. Breast Cancer Res Treat 18(Suppl 1): s135–s141, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  14. Holm LE, Nordevang E, Hjalmar ML, Lidbrink E, Callmer E, Nilsson B: Treatment failure and dietary habits in women with breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 85: 32–36, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jain M, Miller AB, To T: Premorbid diet and the prognosis of women with breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 86: 1390–1397, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jain M, Miller AB: Premorbid body size and the prognosis of women with breast cancer. Int J Cancer 59: 363–368, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  17. Miller AB, Baines CJ, To T, Wall C: Canadian National Breast Screening Study. 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years. 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years. Can Med Assoc J 147: 1459–1488, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miller AB, Howe GR, Wall C: The National Study of Breast Cancer Screening: Protocol for a Canadian randomized controlled trial of screening for breast cancer in women. Clin Invest Med 4: 227–258, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  19. Howe GR, Friedenreich CM, Jain M, Miller AB: A cohort study of fat intake and risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 83: 336–340, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jain M, Harrison L, Howe GR, Miller AB: Evaluation of a self-administered dietary questionnaire for use in a cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr 36: 931–935, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jain MG, Howe GR, Johnson KC, Miller AB: Evaluation of a diet history questionnaire for epidemiologic studies. Am J Epidemiol 111: 212–219, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  22. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service: Composition of foods: raw, processed, prepared. Agriculture Handbook no. 8, 1968; expansion, March 1972

  23. Morgan RW, Jain MG, Miller AB, Choi NW, Matthews V, Munan L, Burch JD, Feather J, Howe GR, Kelly A: A comparison of dietary methods in epidemiologic studies. Am J Epidemiol 107: 488–498, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cox DR: Regression models and life-tables. J Roy Stat Soc 34: 187–220, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kipnis V, Freedman LS, Brown CC, Hartman A, Schatzkin A, Wacholder S: Interpretation of energy adjustment models for nutritional epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol 137: 1376–1380, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sylvester PW, Aylsworth CF, Meites J: Relationship of hormones to inhibition of mammary tumor development by underfeeding during the ‘critical period’ after carcinogen administration. Cancer Res 41: 1384–1388, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hislop TG, Kan L, Coldman AJ, Band PR, Brauer G: Influence of estrogen receptor status on dietary risk factors for breast cancer. Can Med Assoc J 138: 424–430, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  28. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Food Balance Sheets — 1981 averages. Rome 1984

  29. Yoo KY, Tajima K, Miura S, Yoshida M, Murai H, Kuroshi T, Lee Y, Risch H, Dubrow R: A hospital-based case-control study of breast-cancer risk factors by estrogen and progesterone receptor status. Cancer Cause Control 4: 39–44, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  30. McKeown-Eyssen GE, Rogers-Mclemad I, Clarke EA: Estrogen receptor status of breast cancer in Ontario. Can Med Assoc 133: 997–1000, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wittliff J: Steroid hormone receptors in breast cancer. Cancer 53: 630–643, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wynder EL, Rose DP, Cohen LA: Diet and breast cancer in causation and therapy. Cancer 58: 1804–1813, 1986

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jain, M., Miller, A.B. Tumor characteristics and survival of breast cancer patients in relation to premorbid diet and body size. Breast Cancer Res Treat 42, 43–55 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005798124538

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005798124538

Navigation