Skip to main content
Log in

Timing of Information Presentation in Learning Statistics

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study in the domain of statistics comparesfour information presentation formats in a 2 × 2factorial design: timing of supportiveinformation (before or during taskpractice) × timing of procedural information(before or during task practice).Seventy-two psychology and education students(7 male and 65 female; mean age 18.5 years,SD = 2.85) participated. Theeffectiveness of the learning material wasmeasured by test performance. The instructionalefficiency was measured by a combination ofmental effort during practice and testperformance (i.e., a high test performancecombined with a low mental effort duringpractice denotes a high instructionalefficiency). ANOVA showed a main effect fortiming of supportive information: presentationduring practice led to more efficient learning than presentationbefore practice. Moreover, an interactioneffect was found. Simultaneous presentation ofprocedural information before andsupportive information during practiceled to the most efficient learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J.R. (1993) Rules of the Mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.R. (1996) ACT: A simple theory of complex cognition. American Psychologist 51: 355–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, D.P. (1963) The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning. New York: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, D.P. & Robinson, F.G. (1969) School Learning: An Introduction to Educational Psychology. London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A.D. (1992) Working memory. Science 255: 556–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, R.A., Sullivan, M.A. & Schneider, W. (1989) Component fluency in a problem solving context. Human Factors 31(5): 489–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, R.A., Khoo, B.H. & Elliott II, R.G. (1990) Component practice and exposure to a problem-solving context. Human Factors 32(3): 267–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerpa, N., Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1996) Some conditions under which integrated computer-based training software can facilitate learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research 15(4): 345–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1991) Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction 8(4): 293–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1992) The split attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology 62: 233–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1996) Cognitive load while learning to use a computer program. Applied Cognitive Psychology 10: 151–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derry, S. & Lesgold, A. (1996) Toward a situated social practice model for instructional design. In David C. Berliner & Robert C. Calfee (eds), Handbook of Educational Psychology, pp. 787–806. New York, London et al.: Macmillan; Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisk, A.D. & Gallini, J.K. (1989) Training consistent components of tasks: Developing an instructional system based on automatic-controlled processing principles. Human Factors 31: 453–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R.E. (1975) Meaning in complex learning. Review of Educational Research 45(3): 425–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1999) Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology 13(4): 351–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kester, L., Kirschner, P.A., Van Merriënboer, J.J.G. & Bäumer, A. (2001) Just-in-time information presentation and the acquisition of complex cognitive skills. Computers in Human Behavior 17: 373–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschman, T.D., Myers A.C., Feltovich, P.J. & Barrows, H.S. (1994) Using technology to assist in realizing effective learning and instruction: A principled approach to the use of computers in collaborative learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences 3(3): 227–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R.E. (1979) Can advance organizers influence meaningful learning? Review of Educational Research 49: 371–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R.E. & Anderson, R.B. (1991) Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology 83: 484–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R.E. & Anderson, R.B. (1992) The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 84(4): 444–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R.E. & Moreno, R. (1998) Split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology 90(2): 312–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R.E. & Sims, V.K. (1994) For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 86(3): 389–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G.A. (1956) The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63: 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J.D. (1984) Application of advances in learning theory and philosophy of science to the improvement of chemistry teaching. Journal of Chemical Education 61(7): 607–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J.D. & Gowin, D.B. (1984) Learning How to Learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paas, F. (1992) Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology 84(4): 429–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paas, F. & Van Merriënboer, J.J.G. (1993) The efficiency of instructional conditions: An approach to combine mental effort and performance measures. Human Factors 35(4): 737–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paas, F., Van Merriënboer, J.J.G. & Adam, J.J. (1994) Measurement of cognitive load in instructional research. Perceptual and Motor Skills 79: 419–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, R.W. & Reeve, T.G. (1988) The acquisition of procedural productions and modification of declarative representations in spatial precueing tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 117: 293–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. & Perkins, D.N. (1998) Individual and social aspects of learning. Review of Research in Education 23: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (1988) Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science 12: 257–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (1999) Instructional Design in Technical Areas. Camberwell, Australia: ACER Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. & Chandler, P. (1994) Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction 12(3): 185–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J.J.G. & Paas, F. (1998) Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review 10(3): 251–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valcke, M.P., Kirschner, P.A. & Bos, E. (1999) Enabling technologies to design, produce, and exploit flexible, electronic learning materials. In: J. van den Akker, R.M. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen & Tj Plomp (eds), Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Merriënboer, J.J.G., Kirschner, P.A. & Kester, L. (2003) Taking the load of a learner's mind. Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist 38(1): 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K.A. & Cavallo, A.M. (1995) Relationships between reasoning ability, meaningful learning and students' understanding of physics concepts. Journal of College Science Teaching 24(5): 311–314.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kester, L., Kirschner, P.A. & van Merriënboer, J.J. Timing of Information Presentation in Learning Statistics. Instructional Science 32, 233–252 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TRUC.0000024191.27560.e3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TRUC.0000024191.27560.e3

Navigation