Abstract
This ethnography focuses on the techniques of normalization used by university professors who are accused by their colleagues of bullying behavior. We examine how the organizational structure and institutional values of the university provide protective coloration for academic intimidation and discourage both the detection and effective labeling of such behavior. In noting that attempts to label bullying behavior frequently fail because the judgments are seen as mere matters of opinion in an environment whose principal currency of exchange is opinion itself, we modify and extend Sykes and Matza's discussion of neutralization techniques to academic settings. While we cannot speak to the presence or absence of guilt feelings on the part of alleged academic bullies, or to whether neutralization techniques successfully assuage such feelings, we can nevertheless discern the operation of these techniques to resist the imputation of unflattering social identities and/or to lay claim to public identities that are highly esteemed within the academy. Moreover, we identify three additional techniques of normalization that are employed by alleged ivory tower bullies: appropriation and inversion, in which accused bullies claim victim status for themselves; evidentiary solipsism, in which alleged bullies portray themselves as uniquely capable of divining and defining the “true” meaning-structure of events; and emotional obfuscation, which takes the form of employing symbols and imagery that are chosen for their perceived ability to elicit an emotional response on the part of an academic audience.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Agnew, Robert. (1994). The techniques of neutralization and violence. Criminology, 32, 555–579.
Arthurs, H.W. (Chair), Blais, R. A., & Thompson, J. (1994). Integrity in scholarship: A report to Concordia University. Mimeo, April.
Becker, H. (1963). Outsiders. New York: The Free Press.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality.NewYork: Doubleday Anchor.
Biggam, F. H., & Power, K.G. (1999).Acomparison of the problem-solving abilities and psychological distress of suicidal, bullied, and protected prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 196–216.
Cavan, S. (1966). Liquor license. Chicago: Aldine.
Cleary, T. (1998). Translator's preface. In Sun Tzu (Thomas Cleary, trans.), The art of war (pp. 7–56). Boston: Shambhala.
Cowan, J. S. (1994). Lessons from the Fabrikant file: A report to the Board of Governors of Concordia University. An independent review of the employment history of Valery Fabrikant at Concordia, with particular emphasis on concrete measures to enhance the future ability of the University to deal with a wide range of issues raised by the case in question. Montreal: Mimeo.
Crick, N. (1997). Engagement in gender normative versus nonnormative forms of aggression: Links to social-psychological adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 33, 610–617.
Crick, N., & Dodge, K. A. (1999). “Superiority” is in the eye of the beholder: A comment on Sutton, Smith and Swettenham. Social Development, 8, 128–131.
Curcione, N. (1997). Suburban snowmen: Facilitating factors in the careers of middle-class coke dealers. Deviant Behavior, 18, 233–253.
deYoung, M. (1992). The indignant page: Techniques of neutralization in the publications of pedophile organizations. Child Abuse and Neglect, 12, 583–591.
Dodder, R. A., & Hughes, S. P. (1993). Neutralization and drinking behavior. Deviant Behavior, 14, 65–79.
Douglas, J. D. (1970). Deviance and respectability: The social construction of moral meanings. London: Basic Books.
Duncan, R. D. (1998). Maltreatment by parents and peers: The relationship between child abuse, bully victimization and psychological distress. Child Maltreatment, 4, 45–55.
Eliason, S. L., & Dodder, R. (1999). Techniques of neutralization used by deer poachers in the western United States. Deviant Behavior, 20, 233–252.
Erikson, K. (1964). Notes on the sociology of deviance. In H. S. Becker (Ed.), The other side (pp. 9–21). New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
Fattah, E. (1991). Understanding criminal victimization. Scarborough, Ontario: Prentice-Hall Canada Inc.
Fish, S. (1994). There's no such thing as free speech. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fogel, S. (1988). The postmodern university: Essays on the deconstruction of the humanities. Toronto: ECW Press.
Gannon, R. (1995). The duty of fair representation: faculty associations have the responsibility to represent and support members involved in disputes. Canadian Association of University Teachers Bulletin, October 4.
Garfinkel, H. (1956). Conditions of successful degradation ceremonies. American Journal of Sociology, 61, 420–424.
Garrett, T. (1997). Trainer-trainee bullying. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 227–232.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday-Anchor.
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums. New York: Anchor.
Goldsmith, A. J. (1991). External review and self-regulation: police accountability and the dialectic of complaints procedures. In A. J. Goldsmith (Ed.), Complaints against the police: The trend to external review (pp. 13–62). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hamlin, J. E. (1988). The misplaced role of rational choice in neutralization theory. Criminology, 26, 425–438.
Hazani, M. (1991). Aligning vocabulary, symbol banks, and sociocultural structure. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 20, 179–202.
Heubeck, B., & O'Sullivan, C. (1998). An exploration into the nature, frequency and impact of school hassles in the middle school years. Australian Psychologist, 33, 130–137.
Hodges, E. V., & Perry, D. G. (1999). Personal and interpersonal antecedents and consequences of victimization by peers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 677–685.
Hollander, E. P. (1958). Conformity, status and idiosyncracy credit. Psychological Review, 65, 117–127.
Hughes, E. (1962). Good people and dirty work. Social Problems, 10, 3–11.
Johnston, M. (1996). Dealing with bullying. New York: Rosen Publishing Groups Power/Kids Press.
Kitsuse, J. (1962). Societal reaction to deviant behavior: Problems of theory and method. Social Problems, 9, 247–256.
Lajoie, G., McLellan, A., & Lajoie, G. (1997). Taking action against bullying. Coquitlam, BC: Bully B'Ware Productions.
Leymann, H. (1996). The content and development of mobbing at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 165–184.
Madson, K. C. (1996). Differing perceptions of bullying and their practical implications. Educational and Child Psychology, 13, 14–22.
McCormick, A. E., & Zampa, F. P. (1990). Over-riding accusations: Contexts of corporate responses to stockholder proxy resolutions. Deviant Behavior, 11, 175–193.
McIntyre, S. (1995). Gender bias within the law school: “The memo” and its impact. In The Chilly Collective (Ed.), Breaking anonymity: The chilly climate for women faculty (pp. 211–263). Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfred Laurier University Press.
Mead, G. H. (1938). The philosophy of the act. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Miceli, M., & Castelfranchi, C. (1998). How to silence one's conscience: Cognitive defenses against the feeling of guilt. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 28, 287–318.
Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
Minor, W. W. (1981). Techniques of neutralization: A reconceptualization and empirical examination. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 18, 295–318.
Nader, R., & Shugart, C. (1980). Old solutions for old problems. In L. Nader (Ed.), No access to law: Alternatives to the American judicial system (pp. 3–21). New York: Academic Press.
Nelson, E. D. (1994). Sugar daddies and the gentleman's code. Qualitative Sociology, 16, 143–168.
Olweus, D. (1989). The Olweus bully/victim questionnaire. Norway: Mimeo.
Olweus, D. (1992). Victimization among schoolchildren: Intervention and prevention. In G.W. Albee, L. A. Bond, & T. C. Monsey (Eds.), Improving children's lives: Global perspectives on prevention (pp. 279–295). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Ortony, A. (1987). Is guilt an emotion? Cognition and Emotion, 1, 283–298.
Pfohl, S. J. (1985). Images of deviance & social control. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Pfuhl, E. H. (1978). The unwed father: A non-deviant rule breaker. The Sociological Quarterly, 19, 113–128.
Pogrebin, M. R., Poole, E. D., & Martinez, A. (1992). Accounts of professional misdeeds: The sexual exploitation of clients by psychotherapists. Deviant Behavior, 13, 229–252.
Randall, P. (1997). Adult bullying: Perpetrators and victims. London, UK: Routledge.
Rayner, C., & Hoel, H. (1997). A summary review of literature relating to workplace bullying. Journal of Community and Social Psychology, 7, 181–191.
Reiss, A. J. Jr. (1961). The social integration of queers and peers. Social Problems, 9, 102–119.
Roberts, P., & Vickers, L. (1998). Harassment at work as discrimination: The current debate in England and Wales. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 3, 91–114.
Sabini, J., & Silver, M. (1997). In defense of shame: Shame in the context of guilt and embarrassment. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 27, 1–15.
Salamon, E. (1984). Kept women: Mistresses in the '80s. London: Orbis.
Schuster, B. (1999). Outsiders at school: The prevalence of bullying and its relation to social status. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2, 175–190.
Scott, R. A. (1972). A proposed framework for analysing deviance as a property of social order. In R. A. Scott & J. D. Douglas (Eds.), Theoretical perspectives on deviance (pp. 9–35). London: Basic Books.
Sheley, J. F. (1980). Is neutralization theory necessary for criminal behavior? Deviant Behavior, 2, 49–72.
Smith, P. K. (1997). Bullying in life-span perspective: What can studies of school bullying and workplace bullying learn from each other? Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 249–255.
Smith, P. K., Morita, Y., Junger-Tas, J., Olweus, D., Catalano, R. F., & Slee, P. (1999). The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective. New York: Routledge.
Stanley, L., & Arora, T. (1998). Social exclusion among adolescent girls: Their self-esteem and coping strategies. Educational Psychology in Practice, 14, 94–100.
Sun-Tzu (T. Cleary, Trans.). (1998[6th century B.C.]) The art of war. Boston: Shambhala.
Sutton, J., & Smith, P. K. (1999). Bullying as a group process: An adaptation of the participant role approach. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 97–111.
Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999a). Socially undesirable need not be incompetent: A response to Crick and Dodge. Social Development, 8, 132–134.
Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999b). Bullying and “theory of mind”: A critique of the “social status deficit” view of anti-social behaviour. Social Development, 8, 117–127.
Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization. American Sociological Review, 22, 664–670.
Tannenbaum, F. (1951). Crime and the community. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Tattum, D., & Herbert, G. (Eds.) (1997). Bullying: Home, school and community. London: David Fulton.
Terry, A. A. (1998). Teachers as targets of bullying by their pupils: A study to investigate incidence. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 255–268.
Thompson, W. E., & Harred, J. L. (1992). Topless dancers. Deviant Behavior, 13, 291–311.
Thurman, Q. C., St. John, C., & Riggs, L. (1984). Neutralization and tax evasion: How effective would a moral appeal be in improving compliance to tax laws? Law and Policy, 6, 309–328.
Tomita, S. K. (1990). The denial of elder mistreatment by victims and abusers: The application of neutralization theory. Violence and Victims, 5, 171–184.
Victoria. (1978). Report of the Board of Inquiry into allegations against members of the Victoria Police Force. Melbourne: Government Printer.
Vitell, S. J., & Grove, S. J. (1987). Marketing ethics and the techniques of neutralization. Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 433–438.
Weber, M. (E. Fischoff, Trans.) (1968[1922]). Economy and society. New York: Bedminster Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nelson, E.D., Lambert, R.D. Sticks, Stones and Semantics: The Ivory Tower Bully's Vocabulary of Motives. Qualitative Sociology 24, 83–106 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026695430820
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026695430820