Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Germination in Baltic coastal wetland meadows: similarities and differences between vegetation and seed bank

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The abundance and variety of seedlings in Baltic coastal grasslands was studied in cattle grazed and ungrazed areas in seashore and delta on the western coast of Finland. The vegetation, seed bank and environmental conditions of the same sites were also studied. Altogether 4609 seedlings were observed in 79 field plots (20 cm× 20 cm) making an average of 1458.54 seedlings/m2. The majority of the seedlings were dicots (67.5%) and perennials (96.8%). Altogether 44 species and an average of 4.14 species per plot were identified as seedlings. The most abundant taxon, Carex formed 23.2% of all the seedlings observed in the field. In the delta the seedling density was two times that found at the seashore. Also, the numbers of species of seedlings per plot were significantly higher in the delta than in the seashore, but in total, more species germinated from the seashore than from the delta even though the number of plots was higher in the delta (n = 51) than in the seashore (n = 28). The numbers of species and seedlings per plot were smaller in grazed sites than in ungrazed ones similar to the pattern earlier reported concerning the mature vegetation and seed bank. The mean numbers of seedlings were the highest at lower geolittoral plots (about 20 cm elevation), where the seed bank was also densest. About 60.0% of the mature species in the plots were also detected as seedlings and 91.4% of the seedling species were found in the mature vegetation of the plots. The number of seedlings was positively correlated with the cover of mature vegetation giving support to the nurse effect theory. Seedling numbers were negatively correlated with the abundance of litter indicating that litter restricts germination because it is a mechanical barrier but also decreases the amount of light. The number of seedlings and species, both in total and per unit area, were greater in the seed bank than in the field seedling population. The seedling population was more similar to the mature vegetation than to the seed bank.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakker J.P., Dijkstra M. and Russchen P.T. 1985. Dispersal, germination and early establishment of halophytes and glycophytes on a grazed and abandoned salt marsh gradient. New Phytologist 101: 291–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers J.C. 1995. Relationships between seed fates and seedling establishment in an alpine ecosystem. Ecology 76: 2124–2133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley M.J. 1986. Plant Ecology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debussche M. and Isenmann P. 1994. Bird-dispersed seed rain and seedling establishment in patchy Mediterranean vegetation. Oikos 69: 414–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenner M. 1985. Seed Ecology. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman B., Hill N., Svoboda J. and Henry G. 1982. Seed banks and seedling occurrence in a high Arctic oasis at Alexandra Fjord, Ellesmere Island, Canada. Canadian Journal of Botany 60: 2112–2118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough L., Grace J.B. and Taylor K.L. 1994. The relationship between species richness and community biomass: The importance of environmental variables. Oikos 70: 271–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace J.B. and Jutila H. 1999. The Relationship between Species Density and Community Biomass in Grazed and Ungrazed Coastal Meadows. Oikos 85: 398–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime J.P. 1979. Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime J.P., Hodgson J.P. and Hunt R. 1988. Comparative Plant Ecology: A Functional Approach to Common British Species.Unwin Hyman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb P.J. 1977. The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: the importance of regeneration niche. Biological Reviews 52: 107–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hämet-Ahti L., Suominen J., Ulvinen T. and Uotila P. 1998. Retkeilykasvio (Field Flora of Finland). Finnish Museum of Natural History. 4th edn. Botanical Museum, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper J.L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press Inc, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houle G. 1995. Seed dispersal and seedling recruitment: The missing link(s). Ecoscience 2: 238–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jutila H. 1997a. Vascular plant species richness in grazed and ungrazed coastal meadows, SW Finland. Annales Botanici Fennici 34: 245–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jutila H. 1998a. Seed bank of grazed and ungrazed Baltic seashore meadows. Journal of Vegetation Science 9: 395–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jutila H. 1998b. Effect of different treatments on the seed bank of grazed and ungrazed Baltic seashore meadows. Canadian Journal of Botany 76: 1188–1197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jutila H. 1999a. Effect of grazing on the vegetation of shore meadows along the Bothnian Sea, Finland. Plant Ecology 140: 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jutila b. Erkkilä H. 1999b. Vegetation and Seed Bank of Grazed and Ungrazed Baltic Coastal Meadows, in SW Finland. Annales Universitatis Turkuensis Series AII Tom.

  • Jutila H. 2000. On the seed banks of grazed and ungrazed Baltic coastal grasslands. In: Proceedings IAVS Symposium. IAVS, Opulus Press, Uppsala, Sweden, pp.272–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jutila H. 2001a. How does grazing by cattle modify the vegetation of coastal grasslands along the Baltic Sea? Ann. Bot. Fennici 38: 181–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jutila H.M. 2001b. Effect of flooding and draw-down disturbance on the germination from coastal a grassland seed bank. J. Veg.Sci 12: 729–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jutila H., Pykälä J. and Lehtomaa L. 1996. Satakunnan Perinnemaisemat.Alueelliset ympäristöjulkaisut 14. Suomen ympäristökeskus, Helsinki, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec J.A. and Smith L.M. 1984. Marsh plants establishment on newly flooded salt flats. Wildlife Soc. Bull. 12: 388–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauppi M. 1967. Uber den Einfluss der Beweidung auf die Vegetation der Uferwiesen an der Bucht Liminganlahti im Nordteil des Bottnischen Meerbusens. Aquilo Series Botanica 6: 347–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leck M.A. and Graveline K.J. 1979. The seed bank of a freshwater tidal marsh. Am. J. Bot. 66: 1006–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leck M.A. and Simpson R.L. 1987. Seed bank of a freshwater tidal wetland: turnover and relationship to vegetation change. Am. J.Bot. 74: 360–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leck M.A. and Simpson R.L. 1993. Seeds and seedlings of the Hamilton Marshes, a Delaware River Tidal freshwater wetland.Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 144: 267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leck M.A. and Simpson R.L. 1994. Tidal freshwater wetland zonation: Seed and seedling dynamics. Aquatic Botany 47: 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leck M.A. and Simpson R.L. 1995. Ten-year seed bank and vegetation dynamics of a tidal freshwater marsh. American Journal of Botany 11: 1547–1557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leck M.A., Simpson R.L. and Parker V.T. 1989. The Seed Bank of a Freshwater Tidal Wetland and Its Relationship to Vegetation Dynamics. In: Sharitz and Gibbons (eds), Freshwater Wetlands and Wildlife. DOE Symposium Series. Vol. 61., pp. 189–205.

  • Lenssen J., Menting F., Van Der Putten W. and Blom K. 1999. Control of plant species richness and zonation of functional groups along a freshwater flooding gradient. Oikos 86: 523–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune B. and Mefford M.J. 1995. PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data, Version 2.0. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGraw J.B. and Shaver G.R. 1982. Seedling density and seedling survival in Alaskan cotton grass tussock tundra. Holarctic Ecology 5: 212–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milberg P. 1993. Seed bank and seedlings emerging after soil disturbance in a wet semi-natural grassland in Sweden. Annales Botanici Fennici 30: 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milchunas D.G. and Lauenroth W.K. 1993. Quantitative Effects of Grazing on Vegetation and Soils over a Global Range of Environments.Ecological Monographs 63: 327–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore D.R. and Keddy P.A. 1988. Effects of a water-depth gradient on the germination of lakeshore plants. Canadian Journal of Botany 66: 548–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker V.T. and Leck M.A. 1985. Relationship of seed banks to plant distribution patterns in a freshwater tidal wetland. American Journal of Botany 72: 161–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peart D.R. 1989. Species interactions in a successional grassland.I. Seed rain and seedling recruitment. Journal of Ecology 77: 236–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusch G. 1988. Reproductive regeneration in grazed and ungrazed limestone grassland communities on Öland. Preliminary Results.Acta Phytogeographica Suecica 76: 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryser P. 1993. Influences of neighbouring plants on seedling establishment in limestone grassland. Journal of Vegetation Science4: 195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez J.M., Izco J. and Medrano M. 1996. Relationships between vegetation zonation and altitude in a salt-marsh system in northwest Spain. Journal of Vegetation Science 7: 695–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. 1989–1996. The Statistical Analysis System. Ver.Release, 6.12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schupp E.W. 1995. Seed-seedling conflicts, habitat choice, and patterns of plant recruitment. American Journal of Botany 82: 399–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seinä A. and Peltola J. 1991. Jäätalven kestoaika-ja kiintojään paksuustilastoja Suomen merialueilla 1961–1990. (Duration of the ice season and statistics of fast ice thickness along the Finnish coast 1961–1990). Finnish Marine Research 258: 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shumway S.W. and Bertness M.D. 1992. Salt stress limitation of seedling recruitment in a salt marsh plant community. Oecologia, Berlin 92: 490–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith L.M. and Kadlec J.A. 1983. Seed banks and their role during drawdown of a North American marsh. J. Appl. Ecol. 20: 673–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler G. 1969. Studies in the ecology of Baltic sea-shore meadows.II Flora and vegetation. Opera Botanica 25: 1–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk A.G. and Davis C.B. 1978. The role of seed banks in the vegetation dynamics of prairie glacial marshes. Ecology 59: 322–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welling P. and Laine K. 2000. Characteristics of the seedling flora in alpine vegetation, subarctic Finland, I. Seedling densities in 15 plant communities. Annales Botanici Fennici 37: 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wied A. and Galen C. 1998. Plant parental care: Conspecific nurse effects in Frasera speciosa and Cirsium scopulorum. Ecology 79: 1657–1668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Äijälänkatu 4B 12, Hämeenlinna, SF-13210, Finland

    Heli M. Jutila

Authors
  1. Heli M. Jutila
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jutila, H.M. Germination in Baltic coastal wetland meadows: similarities and differences between vegetation and seed bank. Plant Ecology 166, 275–293 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023278328077

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023278328077

Search

Navigation