Abstract
Estimates of the prevalence of marital violence have been found to vary dramatically from survey to survey. This paper addresses one potential explanation for this difference which involves the focus and format of different surveys. We examine the extent to which survey respondents are willing to report marital violence in a context which focuses on criminal behaviors as opposed to a family violence context. In a very basic way, this answers a question as to whether individuals are willing to define acts of marital violence as criminal. Methodologically, it is a measurement issue which seriously affects the ability to compare findings across samples. National Youth Survey data are used to compare rates of generalized spousal assault and victimization reported in a crime context with rates of marital assault and victimization reported in a family violence context. Results indicate that 40 to 83% of all marital assaults and victimizations reported in the marital violence section are not reported in a format which focuses on criminal assault and victimization.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Arias, I., and Beach, S. R. H. (1987). Validity of self-reports of marital violence. J. Fam. Viol. 2: 139–149.
Bachman, R. (1994). Violence Against Women: A National Crime Victimization Survey Report, NCJ-145325. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Bachman, R., and Saltzman, L. E. (1995). Violence against Women: Estimates from the Redesigned Survey. NCJ-154348. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Browning, J., and Dutton, D. (1986). Assessment of wife assault with the conflict tactics scale: Using couple data to quantify the differential reporting effect. J. Marr. Fam. 48: 375–379.
Dobash, R. E., and Dobash, R. P. (1988). Research as social action: the struggle for battered women. In Yllo, K., and Bograd, M. (eds.), Feminist Perspectives on Wife Abuse, Sage Publications, Newbury Park.
FBI (1980). Uniform Crime Reporting Handbook, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Frieze, I. H. (1983). Investigating the causes and consequences of marital rape. Signs 8: 532–553.
Gaquin, D. A. (1977–1978). Spouse abuse: Data from the National Crime Survey. Victimology 2: 632–643.
Gelles, R. J. (1978). Methods for studying sensitive family topics. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 48: 408–424.
Gelles, R. J., and Straus, M. (1979). Determinants of violence in the family: Towards a theoretical integration. In Burr, W., Hill, R., Ivan Nye, F., and Reiss, I. (eds.), Contemporary Theories About the Family, Vol. 1, Free Press, New York.
Greenblat, C. S. (1983). A hit is a hit is a hit... or is it? Approval and tolerance of the use of physical force by spouses. In Finkelhor, D., Gelles, R. J., Hotaling, G. T., and Straus, M. A. (ed.), The Dark Side of Families, Sage, Beverly Hills.
Hindelang, M. J. (1976). Criminal Victimization in Eight American Cities, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA.
Jouriles, E. N., and O'Leary, K. D. (1985). Interspousal reliability of reports of marital violence. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 53: 419–421.
Kelly, L. (1987). How women define their experiences of violence. In Kersti Y., and Bograd, M. (eds.), Feminist Perspectives on Wife Abuse, Sage, Newbury Park.
Okun, L. (1986). Woman Abuse: Facts Replacing Myths, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.
Riggs, D., Murphy, C., and O'Leary, K. D. (1989). Intentional falsification in reports of interpartner aggression. J. Interpers. Viol. 4: 220–232.
Rossi, P. H., Waite, E., Bose, C. E., and Berk, R. E. (1974). The seriousness of crimes: Normative structure and individual differences. Am. Sociological Rev. 39: 224–237.
Smith, M. D. (1994). Enhancing the quality of survey data on violence against women: A feminist approach. Gender Soc. 8: 109–127.
Stark, R., and McEvoy, J. (1970). Middle-class violence. Psychology Today (Nov.):52.
Straus, M. A. (1990a). Injury and frequency of assault and the ‘representative sample fallacy’ in measuring wife beating and child abuse. In Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (eds.), Physical Violence in American Families: Risk Factors and Adaptions to Violence in 8,145 Families, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick.
Straus, M. A. (1990b). The national family violence surveys. In Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (eds.), Physical Violence in American Families: Risk Factors and Adaptions to Violence in 8,145 Families, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick.
Straus, M. A. (1990c). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics (CT) scales. In Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (eds.), Physical Violence in American Families: Risk Factors and Adaptions to Violence in 8,145 Families, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick.
Straus, M. A. (1990d). The conflict tactics scales and its critics: An evaluation and new data on validity and reliability. In M. A. Straus and R. J. Gelles (eds.), Physical Violence in American Families: Risk Factors and Adaptions to Violence in 8,145 Families. New Brunswick: Transaction.
Straus, M. A. (1990e). Appendix B: New scoring methods for violence and new norms for the conflict tactics scales. In Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (eds.), Physical Violence in American Families: Risk Factors and Adaptions to Violence in 8,145 Families, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick.
Straus, M. A., and Lincoln, A. J. (1985). A conceptual framework for understanding crime and the family. In Lincoln, A. J., and Straus, M. A. (eds.), Crime and the Family, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.
Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., and Steinmetz, S. (1980). Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family, Anchor, Garden City, NY.
Sudman, S., and Bradburn, N. (1982). Asking Questions: A Practical Guide to Questionnaire Design, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Szinovacz, M. E. (1983). Using couple data as a methodological tool: The case of marital violence. J. Marr. Fam. 45: 633–644.
Walker, L. E. (1984). The Battered Woman, Harper & Row, New York.
Weis, J. G. (1989). Family violence research methodology and design. In Ohlin, L., and Tonry, M. (eds.), Family Violence, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mihalic, S.W., Elliott, D. If Violence Is Domestic, Does It Really Count?. Journal of Family Violence 12, 293–311 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022800905045
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022800905045