Abstract
Using previously reported protocols, electroporation of 21 very sensitive human cell lines showed poor results with high mortality and low transfection efficiency. Therefore, the influence of several electroporation parameters on transfection success was analyzed. The adjustment of the time constant proved to be most important for optimization of transfection results. Time constant was modulated by changing medium resistance via volume or ionic strength, yielding an average transfection efficiency of 25% and mortality rates below 60%.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andreason, GL and Evans, GA (1989). Anal Biochem 180:269–275
Baum, C, Forster, P, Hegewisch-Becker, S and Habers, K (1994). Biotechniques 17:1058–1062
Chu, G, Hayakawa, H and Berg, P (1987). Nucleic Acids Res 15:1311–1326
Gerharz, CD, Hildebrandt, B, Moll, R, Ramp, U, Sarbia, M, Störkel, S, Koldovsky, P and Gabbert, HE (1996). Brit J Cancer 74:1605–1614
MacGregor, GR (1992). Optimization of electroporation using reporter genes. In: Guide to electroporation and electrofusion, DC Chang, BM Chassy, JA Saunders and AE Sowers, eds pp. 465–470, San Diego: Academic Press
Neumann, E, Schaefer-Ridder, M, Wang, Y and Hofschneider, PH (1982). EMBO J 1:841
Potter, H (1992). Protocols for using electroporation to stably or transiently transfect mammalian cells. In: Guide to electroporation and electrofusion, DC Chang, BM Chassy, JA Saunders and AE Sowers, eds pp. 457–461, San Diego: Academic Press
Tur-Kaspa, R, Teicher, L, Levine, BJ, Skoultchi, AI and Shafritz, DA (1986). Mol Cell Biol 6:716–718
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kalinski, T., Jaquet, K., Langen, R. et al. An optimized electroporation protocol for transfection of sensitive cell lines using basic laboratory equipment. Biotechnology Techniques 11, 717–722 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018432031735
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018432031735