Skip to main content
Log in

An Assessment of the Performance of Indian State-Owned Enterprises

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine the determinants of performance of 68 Indian state-owned enterprises in the manufacturing sector for a five-year period: 1987 to 1991. Relative performance is determined using data envelopment analysis, with variations in performance patterns subsequently explained using regression analysis. We note that the performance of firms in the Indian state-owned sector is characterized by both, low performance, as well as significant and systematic variations in the performance parameters. Size is positively associated and age negatively associated with efficiency. Further, economic liberalization and reforms aimed at improving the performance of state-owned firms induces efficiency gains over time. This heterogeneity within the state-owned sector has policy implications, which we discuss. In countries which have privatized large numbers of their state-owned firms, it is often the larger establishments which have been sold to the public. The state-owned firms in the manufacturing sector that can be candidates for privatization are the smaller and older manufacturing firms. These firms may also be easier to dispose of to private investors. This finding reinforces our central thesis that firm-level analysis within the state-owned sector is useful and important for generating pragmatic policy guidelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aharoni, Y. (1981). “Performance Evaluation of State Owned Enterprise: A Process Perspective.” Management Science 27(11), 1340–1347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahluwalia, I. J. (1991). Productivity and Growth in Indian Manufacturing. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., A. Charnes, and W. W. Cooper, (1984). “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Efficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis.” Management Science 30(9), 1078–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J. N. (1993). India in Transition: Freeing the Economy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhargava, A., L. Franzini, and W. Narendranathan. (1982). “Serial Correlation and the Fixed Effects Model.” Review of Economic Studies, 533–549.

  • Bhaya, H. (1990). “Management Efficiency in the Private and Public Sectors in India.” In J. Heath (ed.), Public Enterprise at the Crossroads. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, A. E., and A. R. Vining. (1989). “Ownership and Performance in Competitive Environments: A Comparison of the Performance of Private, Mixed, and State-Owned Enterprises.” Journal of Law and Economics 32, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno, M. (1978). “Duality, Intermediate Inputs and Value Added.” In M. Fuss and D. McFadden, (eds.), Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capon, N., J. V. Farley, and S. Hoenig. (1990). “Determinants of Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis.” Management Science 36, 1169–1177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. E. (1992). Industrial Efficiency in Six Nations. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. (1978). “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units.” European Journal of Operations Research 2(6), 429–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. (1981). “Program Evaluation and Managerial Efficiency: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Program Follow Through.” Management Science 27, 668–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, E. F. (1974). Accounting for United States Economic Growth: 1929 to 1969. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W. E. (1978). “Hicks' Aggregation Theorem and the Existence of a Real Value Added Function.” In M. Fuss and D. McFadden, (eds.), Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications.Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1967). Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. J. (1957). “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) 120(3), 253–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golany, B., and Y. Roll. (1993). “Some Extensions of Techniques to Handle Non-Discretionary Factors in Data Envelopment Analysis.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 4, 419–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z., and V. Ringstad. (1971). Economies of Scale and the Form of the Production Function. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M., and J. Freeman. (1989). Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. M., and A. J. Palmer. (1988). “The Economics of Internal Organization: The Efficiency of Parastatals in Less Developed Countries.” In P. Cook and C. Kirkpatrick (eds.), Privatization in Less Developed Countries. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalan, B. (1991). India's Economic Crisis: The Way Ahead. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. P. (1991). “Performance Evaluation for State Owned Enterprise. In R. Ramamurti and R. Vernon (eds.), Privatization and Control of State Owned Enterprise. 179–205. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, V., and I. M. D. Little. (1994). India: Macroeconomics and Political Economy, 1964–1991. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khandwalla, P. N. (1990). Excellent Management in the Public Sector. New Delhi, India: Vision Books Pvt. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kmenta, J. (1986). Elements of Econometrics. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P. R., and D. Dyer. (1983). Renewing American Industry. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lioukas, S., D. Bourantas, and V. Papadakis. (1993). “Managerial Autonomy of State Owned Enterprise: Determining Factors.” Organization Science 4, 645–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar, S. K. (1995). “X-Efficiency in Emerging Competitive Markets: The Case of U. S. Telecommunications.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 26(1), 129–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marathe, S. S. (1989). Regulation and Development. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazumdar, D. (1983). “Segmented Labor Markets in Less Developed Countries.” American Economic Review 73, 254–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazumdar, D. (1991). “Import Substituting Industrialization and Protection of the Small Scale: The Indian Experience in the Textile Industry.” World Development 19, 1197–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millward, R. (1988). “Measured Sources of Inefficiency in the Performance of Private and Public Enterprise in the Less Developed Countries.” In P. Cook and C. Kirkpatrick (eds.), Privatization in Less Developed Countries. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayar, B. R. (1990). The Political Economy of India's Public Sector. Bombay: Popular Prakashan Private Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. (1991). “Research on Productivity Growth and Productivity Differences: Dead Ends and New Departures.” Journal of Economic Literature 19, 1029–1064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbery, D. M. (1992). “The Role of Public Enterprises in the National Economy.” Asian Development Review, 1–34.

  • Powell, W. W., and P. J. DiMaggio. (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott, E. C., and R. Vischer. (1980). “Organization Capital.” Journal of Political Economy 88, 446–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurti, R. (1987). “Performance Evaluation in State-Owned Enterprises in Theory and Practice.” Management Science 33, 876–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, Y. V. (1990). “Liberalization and Privatization of Public Enterprise in India.” In J. Heath (ed.), Public Enterprise at the Crossroads. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M., and D. Ross. (1990). Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiford, L. M., and R. M. Thrall. (1990). “Recent Developments in DEA: The Mathematical Programming Approach to Frontier Analysis.” Journal of Econometrics 46, 7–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, P. (1990). “Data Envelopment Analysis Applied to Financial Statements.” Omega 18(2), 131–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, P., and D. Mayston. (1986). “Measuring Efficiency in the Public Sector.” Omega 15(3), 181–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thore, S., G. Kozmetsky and F. Phillips. (1994). “DEA of Financial Statements Data: The U. S. Computer Industry.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 5, 229–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1988). The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivedi, P. (1992). A Critique of Public Enterprise Policy. New Delhi: International Management Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulkens, H. (1992). “Economics and the Performance of the Public Sector.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 63(3), 373–385.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahuja, G., Majumdar, S.K. An Assessment of the Performance of Indian State-Owned Enterprises. Journal of Productivity Analysis 9, 113–132 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018352415813

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018352415813

Navigation