Skip to main content
Log in

Solution of Multi-Player Linear-Quadratic Alternating-Move Games and Its Application to the Timing Pattern of Wage Adjustment

  • Published:
Computational Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to analyze a multi-player linear-quadratic alternating-move dynamicgame, this paper develops a solution method by making use of the similarstructure of this game and a simultaneous-move dynamic game with alternatingpayoff functions. It then applies the method to investigate whether staggeredor synchronized wage adjustment will be preferred when more than two wagesetters interact strategically and dynamically. The results suggest that thestrategic benefit provided by staggered wage adjustment is robust with respectto the number of sectors in the economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball, L. and Romer, D. (1989). The equilibrium and optimal timing of price changes. Review of Economic Studies, 56, 179–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basar, T. and Olsder, G.J. (1999). Dynamic Noncooperative Game Theory, 2nd edn. SIAM, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahuc, P. and Kempf, H. (1997). Employment and wage bargaining in an open monetary union. Review of International Economics, 5(supplement), S92–S110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R.M. and De Groot, M.H. (1970). Multiperiod decision models with alternating choice as the solution to the duopoly problem. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 410–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Fraja, G. (1993). Staggered vs. synchronised wage setting in oligopoly. European Economic Review, 37, 1507–1522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fethke, G. and Policano, A. (1984). Wage contingencies, the pattern of negotiation and aggregate implications of alternative contract structures. Journal of Monetary Economics, 14, 151–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fethke, G. and Policano, A. (1986). Will wage setters ever stagger decisions? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101, 867–877.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, S. (1977). Long term contracts, rational expectations, and the optimal money supply rule. Journal of Political Economy, 85, 163–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kydland, F. (1975). Noncooperative and dominant player solutions in discrete dynamic games. International Economic Review, 16, 321–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, S.-H.P. (1996). Aggregate pattern of time-dependent adjustment rules, I: A game-theoretic analysis of staggered versus synchronised wage setting. Economic Journal, 106, 1645–1658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R., Nickel, S. and Jackman, R. (1991). Unemployment – Macroeconomic Performance and the Labour Market. Oxford University Press.

  • Maskin, E. and Tirole, J. (1987). A theory of dynamic oligopoly, III: Cournot competition. European Economic Review, 31, 947–968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, Y. (1994). Export subsidies under dynamic duopoly. European Economic Review, 38, 1139–1151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J.B. (1980). Aggregate dynamics and staggered contracts. Journal of Political Economy, 88, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lau, SH.P. Solution of Multi-Player Linear-Quadratic Alternating-Move Games and Its Application to the Timing Pattern of Wage Adjustment. Computational Economics 19, 341–357 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015568516528

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015568516528

Navigation