Skip to main content
Log in

The DEAR case

  • Published:
Hyperfine Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The scientific program and the experimental setup of the DEAR (DAΦNE Exotic Atom Research) experiment at the new φ-factory DAΦNE of Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati are described. The objective of DEAR is to perform a 1% measurement of the K α line shift due to the strong interaction in kaonic hydrogen. A measurement will also be performed on kaonic deuterium for the first time. The aim is to investigate low-energy \(\overline K N\) physics and to understand SU(3) chiral symmetry breaking. The setup takes advantage of the unique features of the “kaon beam” from the φ decay in DAΦNE; of a low-temperature pressurized gaseous target; and of a detector for soft X-rays – the Charge-Coupled Device (CCD) – characterized by a very good energy (and spatial) resolution and by an unprecedented background rejection capability. The DEAR experiment represents a major effort in the study of low energy \(\overline K N\) interactions and has the potential to produce a breakthrough in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. Vignola, in: Proc. of the 5th European Particle Accelerator Conf. (EPAC'96), Sitges, Barcelona, eds. S. Myres et al., Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol/Philadelphia (1996) p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Deser et al., Phys. Rev. 96 (1954) 774; T.L. Truemann, Nuclear Phys. 26 (1961) 57.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Toker, A. Gal and J.M. Eisenberg, Nuclear Phys. A 362 (1981) 405.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Torres, R.H. Dalitz and A. Deloff, Phys. Lett. B 174 (1986) 213.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Bahoui et al., Nuclear Phys. A 508 (90) 335c.

  6. J.F. Gunion, P.C. McNamee and M.D. Scadron, Nuclear Phys. B 123 (1977) 445.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. B. Borasoy, hep-ph/9807453 (1998).

  8. EMC Collaboration, J. Ashman et al., Nuclear Phys. B 328 (1989) 1.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. E142 Collaboration, P.L. Anthony et al., Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 6620.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. SMC Collaboration, B. Adeva et al., Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 112001.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Gasser and M.E. Sainio, Phys. Lett. B 253 (1991) 252, 260.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Phys. Rep. 87 (1982) 77; J. Gasser, Ann. Phys. (NY) 136 (1981) 62.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. R.L. Jaffe and C.L. Korpa, Comments Nucl. Part. Phys. 17 (1987) 163.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J.-P. Egger, this issue.

  15. T. Koike, T. Harada and Y. Akaishi, Phys. Rev. C 53 (1996) 79.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Brun et al., GEANT3, CERN Report DD/EE/84–1 (1987).

  17. R. Baldini, C. Guaraldo et al., The DEAR proposal, LNF-95/055(IR) (1995).

  18. S. Guiducci and M.A. Iliescu, Beam-gas background calculation for DEAR, Frascati Report LNF-97/002 (IR) (1997).

  19. R. King, Statistical and systematic errors in the DEAR experiment, DEAR Technical Note IR-3 (1998).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guaraldo, C., Bianco, S., Bragadireanu, A. et al. The DEAR case. Hyperfine Interactions 119, 253–261 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012612231176

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012612231176

Navigation