Abstract
Aim of study: This study sought to determine whether multidisciplinary case conference reviews improved outcomes for nursing home residents, and the effects of this team approach to resident care on carers, including the hands-on carers employed by the nursing home, and health professionals.Method: 245 residents of three Canberra nursing homes were enrolled in this non-randomised controlled trial. The intervention consisted of sessions of three case conference reviews held between 10/4sol;96 and 4sol;12sol;96. These sessions were attended by the General Practitioners (GPs) of the residents discussed, the GP project officer from the ACT Division of General Practice, a clinical pharmacist, senior nursing staff, other health professionals eg physiotherapist, and occasionally the resident concerned or their representative. At each review, a case presentation by the resident's GP was followed by a multidisciplinary discussion of all aspects, medical and non-medical, of the resident's care. The review concluded with a management plan for the resident. In total 75 residents were reviewed.Main outcome measures: Medication use and cost, and mortality.Results: One month after the reviews were completed comparisons between those who were reviewed and those who were not showed non-significant reductions in medication orders, medication cost, and mortality in the reviewed group. Many of the 92 recommendations in the management plans that were carried out benefited the residents (n=37) and/or carers (n=24). The responses of the GPs and the Directors of Nursing to the reviews were overwhelmingly positive.Conclusion: Recommendations arising from multidisciplinary case conferences were carried out to the benefit of patients and carers. Given the support shown by key stakeholders, multidisciplinary conferences should be used more.
References
Roberts MS, King M, Stokes JA, Lynne TA, Bonner CJ, McCarthy S, et al. Medication prescribing and administration in nursing homes. Age Ageing 1998;27:385-92
Nolan L, O'Malley K. Prescribing for the elderly part 1: sensitivity of the elderly to adverse drug reactions. J Am Geriatr Soc 1988;36:142-9
Kellaway GSM, McCrae E. Intensive monitoring for adverse drug effects in patients discharged from acute medical wards. NZ Med J 1973;7:525-8
Cadieux RJ. How multiple drug use increases risk exponentially. Postgrad Med 1989;86:179-86
Roberts MS, Stokes JA, King MA, Lynne TA, Bonner CJ, Purdie DM, et al. Outcomes of a randomised controlled trial of a clinical pharmacy intervention in 52 nursing homes. Br J Clin Pharmacol (2001;51:259-68)
Departments of Medicine, Pharmacy, and Social and Preventive Medicine. Final report to the Commonwealth on the “Project to Optimise the Quality of Drug Use in the Elderly in Long Term Care Facilities in Australia”. University of Queensland, July 1995
Pharmaceutical Society of Australia. Comprehensive medication reviews in residential aged care facilities. Pharmacy Practice Handbook. Canberra: Pharmaceutical Society of Australia, March 1997
Quality of Medication Care Group. National evaluation of medication review services in Australian nursing homes. Final report to the Commonwealth. Quality of Medication Care Group on behalf of the Australian Association of Consultant Pharmacy, with funding from the Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care, 30 July 1999
Feldman EL. The interdisciplinary case conference. Acad Med 1999;74:594
Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services. Schedule of Pharmaceutical Benefits. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1 May 1997
Quality Medication Care. The provision of pharmaceutical review services for Veterans residing in nursing homes. Final Report Part 1. Quality Medication Care, April 1997 44 Pharmacy World & Science Volume 23 No. 2 2001
Owen PA, Allery LA, Harding KG, Hayes TM. General Practitioners' continuing medical education within and outside their practice. Br Med J 1989;299:238-40
Moran JA, Kirk P, Kopelow M. Measuring the effectiveness of a pilot continuing medical education program. Can Fam Physician 1996;42:272-6
Cantillon P, Jones R. Does continuing medical education in General Practice make a difference? Br Med J 1998;318:1276-9
Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Changing physician performance a systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. 1995;274:700-5
Zwar N, Wolk J, Gordon J, Sanson-Fisher R, Kehoe L. Influencing antibiotic prescribing in General Practice: a trial of prescriber feedback and management guidelines. Fam Pract 1999;16:495-500
Doyle C, Ward S. Education and training in residential dementia care in Australia: needs, provision and directions. Aust N Z J Public Health 1998;22:589-97
Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care. Medicare Benefits Schedule Book. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1 Nov 2000 also at www.health.gov.au/pubs/mbs/index.htm
Commonwealth of Australia, Pharmacy Guild of Australia. Third community pharmacy agreement between the Commonwealth of Australia and the Pharmacy Guild of Australia. Canberra: 2000 also at www.health.gov.au/hfs/haf/docs/pharmacyagree.pdf 45 Volume 23 No. 2 2001 Pharmacy World & Science
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
King, M.A., Roberts, M.S. Multidisciplinary case conference reviews: improving outcomes for nursing home residents, carers and health professionals. Pharm World Sci 23, 41–45 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011215008000
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011215008000