Abstract
The authors suggest that the gap between common evaluation practice in teacher preparation and the consensus reform goal of high levels of student learning for all students is an impediment to reinventing teacher preparation, professional development, and the professionalization of teaching. In the context of Oregon’s six-year-old educational transition to a standards-based design for schools and schooling, prospective teachers in Oregon have, since 1989, been required to design, develop, and implement “teacher work samples” as credible evidence of their effectiveness in fostering student learning as a condition for recommendation for an initial teaching license. This article describes teacher work sample methodology and evidence for its reliability and validity in evaluating the performance of prospective teachers. In short, this article describes a methodology that responds to one critical part of the National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future’s challenge to reinvent teacher education and improve student learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker, E. L., Linn, R. L., & Herman, J. L. (1996, Summer). CRESST: A continuing mission to improve educational assessment. Evaluation Comment, 1–23.
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: Longman.
Cotton, K. (1995). Effective schooling practices: A research synthesis, 1995 update [On-line]. http:// www.nwrel.org/scpd/esp/esp95.html
Cowart, B., Schalock, H. D., & Schalock, M. D. (1990). An outcomes-based and context-embedded theory of teacher effectiveness: Implications for teacher preparation, licensure, and permanent status. Paper presented to the Forty-First Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Philosophy of Education Society, Fort Worth, TX, September 28.
Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (1993). Accountability and the changing context of teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Creating learner-centered accountability. New York: National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools, and Teaching, Teachers College, Columbia University.
Education Week and Pew Charitable Trusts. (1997). Quality counts: A report card on the condition of public education in the 50 states. [On-line]. http://www.edweek.org/qc/
Holling, C. S. (1997). Introduction: Times of change. Conservation Ecology [On-line serial], 1(1). http:// www.consecol.org/voll/iss1/art1
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (D. L. Stufflebeam, chair). (1988). The personnel evaluation standards. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Koziol, S. M., Minnick, J. B., & Sherman, M. A. (1996). What student teaching evaluation instruments tell us about emphases in teacher education programs. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 10(1), 53–74.
McConney, A., Schalock, M. D., & Schalock, H. D. (1997). Using indicators of student learning in teacher evaluation. In J. H. Stronge (Ed.), Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice (pp. 162–192). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from person's responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741–749.
Millman, J. (1981). Student achievement as a measure of teaching competence. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 146–166). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (1989). Toward high and rigorous standards for the teaching profession. Washington, DC: Author.
National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York: Author.
National Foundation for the Improvement of Education. (1996). Teachers take charge of their learning: Transforming professional development for student learning. Washington, DC: Author.
Schalock, M. D. (1987). Teacher productivity: What is it? How might it be measured? Can it be warranted? Journal of Teacher Education, 38(5), 59–62.
Schalock, H. D., & Cowart, B. (1993). Document I. Oregon's design for twenty-first century schools and its implications for teachers: A paradigm shift. Monmouth: Division of Continuing Education, Western Oregon State College.
Schalock, M. D., Cowart, B., & Staebler, B. (1993). Teacher productivity revisited: Definition, theory, measurement, and application. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 7(2), 179–196.
Schalock, H. D., & Myton, D. M. (1989). A new paradigm for teacher licensure: Oregon's demand for evidence of success in fostering learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(6), 8–16.
Schalock, H. D., & Smith, D. (1997). Oregon's design for twenty-first century schools and its implications for teaching and learning. Unpublished monograph, Teaching Research Division, Western Oregon University, Monmouth, Oregon.
Schalock, H. D., & Schalock, M. D. (1993). Student learning in teacher evaluation and school improvement: An introduction. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 7(2), 103–104.
Schalock, H. D., Schalock, M. D., Cowart, B., & Myton, D. M. (1993). Extending teacher assessment beyond knowledge and skills: An emerging focus on teacher accomplishments. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 7(2), 105–134.
Schalock, H. D., Schalock, M. D., & Girod, G. (1997). Teacher work sample methodology as used at Western Oregon State College. In J. Millman (Ed.), Grading teachers, grading schools: Is student achievement a valid evaluation measure? (pp. 15–45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Schalock, H. D., Schalock, M. D., & Myton, D. M. (in press). Effective teachers please, Mr. Wise, quality is not enough. Phi Delta Kappan.
Schalock, H. D., Schalock, M. D., Myton, D. M., & Girod, G. (1993). Focusing on learning gains by students taught: A central feature of Oregon's outcome-based approach to the initial preparation and licensure of teachers. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 7(2), 135–158.
Scriven, M. (1994). Duties of the teacher. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8(2), 151–184.
Scriven, M. (1996). Assessment in teacher education: Getting clear on the concept. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(4), 443–450.
Sewall, A. M. (1997, Winter). Accountability and teacher education. National Forum, 77(1), 38–41.
Shulman, L. S. (1970). Reconstruction of educational research. Review of Educational Research, 40, 371–396.
Stiggins, R. (1995). Assessment literacy for the twenty-first century. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(3), 238–245.
Tellez, K. (1996). Authentic Assessment. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (2nd ed.) (pp. 704–721). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McConney, A.A., Schalock, M.D. & Schalock, H.D. Focusing Improvement and Quality Assurance: Work Samples as Authentic Performance Measures of Prospective Teachers’ Effectiveness. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 11, 343–363 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007974009896
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007974009896