Abstract
Detailed observations of the courtship and mating of the European earwig Forficula auricularia revealed a complex of sexual behaviors for both males and females. A sequential analysis of the transition frequencies between male preceding-following behaviors showed that courtship is intricate and nonstereotyped. The significance of the male forceps was demonstrated by their use in early courtship with displays and later use as a tactile stimulus for the female. A study of males from which the forceps had been removed showed no mating by altered males. Male forcep length was bimodally distributed and positively allometric, while female forcep length was normally distributed. Males with longer forceps did not have a mating advantage. Receptive females were behaviorally active during courtship. The possible evolutionary development of the sexual dimorphism of the earwig is discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Alcock, J. (1979). The evolution of intraspecific diversity in male reproductive strategies in some bees and wasps. In Blum, M. S., and Blum, N. A. (eds.), Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects, Academic Press, New York.
Alexander, R. D. (1959). The courtship and copulation of Pasimachus punctulatus Haldemann (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 52: 485.
Bennett, C. B. (1904). Earwigs (Anisolabis maritima Bon.). Psyche 11: 47–53.
Bharadwaj, R. K. (1966). Observations on the bionomics of Euborellia annulipes (Dermaptera: Labiduridae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 59: 441–450.
Caussanel, C. (1970). Principles exigenes ecophysiologiques du forficule des sables, Labidura riparia (Derm. Labiduridae). Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. 6: 589–612.
Chapman, R. (1982). The Insects: Structure and Function, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Crumb, S., Eide, P., and Bonn, A. (1941). The European earwig. USDA Tech. Bull. No. 766.
Daniel, W. W. (1990). Applied Nonparametric Statistics, 2nd ed., PWS-Kent, Boston.
Deka, M., and Hazarika, L. K. (1996). Mating behavior of Dicladispa armigera (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 89: 137–141.
Diakonov, D. (1925). Experimental and biometrical investigations on the dimorphic variability of Forficula. J. Genet. 15: 201–232.
Eberhard, W. G. (1985). Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Eberhard, W. G., and Gutierrez, E. E. (1991). Male dimorphisms in beetles and earwigs and the question of developmental constraints. Evolution 45: 18–28.
Fagen, R. M., and Young, D. M. (1978). Temporal patterns of behaviors: Durations, intervals, latencies, and sequences. In Colgan, P. W. (ed.), Quantitative Ethology, Wiley, New York.
Fulton, B. B. (1924). Some habits of earwigs. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 17: 357–367.
Gadgil,M. (1972). Male dimorphism as a consequence of sexual selection. Am.Nat. 106: 574–580.
Giles, E. (1970). Dermaptera (earwigs). In Waterhouse, D. (ed.), The Insects of Australia, Melbourne University Press, Melbourne.
Goe, M. (1925). Eight months' study of earwigs (Dermaptera). Entomol. News 36: 234–238.
Johnson, L. (1982). Sexual selection in a brentid weevil. Evolution 36: 251–262.
King, P. E., Askew, R. R., and Sanger, C. (1969). The detection of parasitized hosts by males of Nasonia vitripennis (Walker) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) and some possible implications. Proc. Roy. Entomol. Soc. London 44A: 85–90.
Kuhl, W. (1928). The variability of abdominal appendages in Forficula auricularia L. with consideration of their normal and abnormal development, and including an appendix on sexual biology. Z. Morph. Oek. Tiere 12: 299.
Lamb, R. J., and Wellington, W. G. (1975). Life history and population characteristics of the European earwig, Forficula auricularia (Dermaptera: Forficulidae), at Vancouver, British Columbia. Can. Entomol. 107: 819–824.
Moore, A. J., and Wilson, P. (1993). The evolution of sexually dimorphic earwig forceps: Social interactions among adults of the toothed earwig, Vostox apicedentatus. Behav. Ecol. 4: 40–48.
Morgan, W. P. (1923). Notes on the function of the forceps of earwigs. Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci. 33: 303–306.
Nijhout, H. F., and Wheeler, D. E. (1996). Growth models of complex allometries in holometabolous insects. Am. Nat. 148: 40–56.
Petrie, M. (1988). Intraspecific variation in structures that display competitive ability: Large animals invest relatively more. Anim. Behav. 36: 1174–1180.
Petrie, M. (1992). Are all secondary sexual display structures positively allometric and, if so, why? Anim. Behav. 43: 173–175.
Platt, A. (1978). Editor's note. J. Lep. Soc. 32: 305.
Popham, R. (1965). The functional morphology of the reproductive organs of the common earwigs (Forficula auricularia) and other Dermaptera with reference to the natural classification of the order. J. Zool. 146: 1–43.
Radesater, T., and Halldorsdottir, H. (1993). Two types of the common earwig: male-male competition and mating success. Ethology 95: 89–96.
Reitz, S., and Adler, P. (1991). Courtship and mating behavior of Eucelatoria bryani (Diptera: Tachinidae), a larval parasitoid of Heliothis species (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 84: 111–117.
Simmons, L.W., and Tomkins, J. L. (1996). Sexual selection and the allometry of earwig forceps. Evol. Ecol. 10: 97–104.
Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. (1981). Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, Freeman, New York.
Thornhill, R., and Alcock, J. (1983). The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Tomkins, J. L., and Simmons, L. W. (1998). Female choice and manipulations of forceps size and symmetry in the earwig, Forficula auricularia. L. Anim. Behav. 56: 347–356.
Van Heerdt, P. (1953). The variability of the forceps in the male common earwig, Forficula auricularia L. (Dermapt.). Entomol. Ber. Amst. 14: 383–385.
Walker, K. A., Jones, T. H., and Fell, R.D. (1993). Pheromonal basis of aggregation of European earwig, Forficula auricularia L. (Dermaptera: Forficulidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 19: 2029–2038.
Walpole, R. E., and Myers, R. (1989). Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists, Macmillan, New York.
Zar, J. (1984). Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Walker, K.A., Fell, R.D. Courtship Roles of Male and Female European Earwigs, Forficula auricularia L. (Dermaptera: Forficulidae), and Sexual Use of Forceps. Journal of Insect Behavior 14, 1–17 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007843227591
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007843227591