Skip to main content
Log in

Spina bifida and parental occupation: Results from three malformation monitoring programs in Europe

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the evidence for an association between spina bifida and parental agricultural occupations is inconclusive, we evaluated this association and the potential associations between spina bifida and other parental occupations. Three register-based case–referent studies were conducted in Sweden, Spain, and Hungary. From the registries of congenital malformations in each country, 482, 478, and 1119 cases with spina bifida were identified, respectively. Identified as referents were 964, 434, and 1489 children without abnormalities. Information on parental occupation was available in the registries from questionnaires or interviews conducted among the parents. Occupations with a potential for physical or chemical exposure were compared to non-exposed occupations. Increased odds ratios (ORs) were observed for women in agricultural occupations in Sweden (OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 0.8–4.2) and in Spain (OR: 2.2, 95% CI: 0.8–5.9), but not in Hungary (OR: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.7–1.7). Several other parental occupations were analysed, but the associations with spina bifida were inconsistent. Concluding, the results are not totally consistent but point to an increased risk of spina bifida among women in agricultural occupations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Little J, Elwood JH. Socioeconomic status and occupation. In: Elwood JM, Little J, Elwood JH (eds) Epidemiology and Control of Neural tube Defects. Monographs in Epidemiology and Biostatistics, vol 20. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992: 456–520.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brown NA. Are offspring at risk from their father's exposure to toxins? Nature 1985; 316: 110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hales BF, Smith S, Robaire B. Cyclofosfamide in theseminalfluid of treated males: Transmission to females by mating and effect on pregnancy outcome. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 1986; 27: 602–611.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Colie CF. Male mediated teratogenesis. Reprod Toxicol 1993; 7: 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Olshan AF, Faustman EM. Male-mediated developmental toxicity. Reprod Toxicol 1993; 7: 191–202.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Matte TD, Mulinare J, Erickson JD. Case-control study of congenital defects and parental employment in health care. Am J Ind Med 1993; 24: 11–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hammond FG, Canache MF. Some epidemiological aspects of neural tube defects in Barquisimeto, Venezuela. Abstract. Am J Hum Genet 1991; 49 (suppl.): 470.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ericson A, Källén B, Löfkvist E. Environmental factors in the etiology of neural tube defects: A negative study. Environ Res 1988; 45: 38–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fedrick J. Anencephalus in the Oxford record linkage study area. Dev Med Child Neurol 1976; 18: 643–656.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Olshan AF, Teschke K, Baird PA. Paternal occupation and anomalies in offspring. Am J Ind Med 1991; 20: 447–475.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brender CJ, Suarez L. Paternal occupation and anencephaly. Am J Epidemiol 1990; 131: 517–521.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schnitzer PG, Olshan AF, Erickson JD. Paternal occupation and risk of birth defects in offspring. Epidemiology 1995; 6: 577–583.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Blatter BM, Roeleveld N, Zielhuis GA, Mullaart RA, Gabreëls FJM. Spina bifida and parental occupation. Epidemiology 1996; 7: 188–193.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Blatter BM, Roeleveld N, Zielhuis GA, Gabreëls FJM, Verbeek ALM. Maternal occupational exposure during pregnancy and the risk of spina bifida. Occ Environ Med 1996; 53: 80–86.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nurminen T, Rantala K, Kurppa K, Holmberg PC. Agricultural work during pregnancy and selected structural malformations in Finland. Epidemiology 1995; 6: 23–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Monitoring Systems. Congenital Malformations Worldwide. A Report from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Monitoring Systems. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Källén B, Winberg J. Swedish register of congenital malformations. Experience with continuous registration during two years with special reference to multiple malformations. Pediatrics 1968; 41: 765.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rothman KJ. Modern Epidemiology. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. 1986; 256: 7–40.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Martínez-Frías ML. Clinical manifestation of prenatal exposure to valproic acid using case reports and epidemiologic information. Am J Med Genet 1990; 37: 277–282.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Martínez-Frías ML, Frías JL, Salvador J. Clinical/epidemiological analysis of malformations. Am J Med Genet 1990; 35: 121–125.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Czeizel A, Rácz J. Evaluation of drug intake during pregnancy in the Hungarian case-control surveillance of congenital anomalies. Teratology 1990; 42: 505–512.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Czeizel A, Pazsy A, Pusztai J, Nagy M. Aetiological monitor of congenital abnormalities: A case-control surveillance system. Acta Paediatr Hungarica 1983; 24: 91–99.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Blatter BM, Star M van der, Roeleveld N. Review of neural tube defects; risk factors in parental occupation and the environment. Environ Health Perspect 1994; 102: 140–145.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Elwood M, Little J, Elwood JH. Maternal illness and drug use during pregnancy. In: Elwood JM, Little J, Elwood JH (eds) Epidemiology and Control of Neural Tube Defects. Monographs in Epidemiology and Biostatistics, vol 20. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992: 415–455.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Selevan SG, Lemasters GK. The dose-response fallacy in human reproductive studies of toxic exposures. J Occup Med 1987; 29: 451–454.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kristensen P, Irgens LM, Andersen A, Offspring of Norwegian Farmers, 1967–1991. Epidemiology 1997; 8: 537–544.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blatter, B., Roeleveld, N., Bermejo, E. et al. Spina bifida and parental occupation: Results from three malformation monitoring programs in Europe. Eur J Epidemiol 16, 343–351 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007679525757

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007679525757

Navigation