Adsorption Forces between Hydrophobic Monolayers

V. V. Yaminsky,* B. W. Ninham, H. K. Christenson, and R. M. Pashley§
Department of Applied Mathematics, Research School of Physical Sciences and Engineering, Institute of Advanced Studies, and Department of Chemistry, The Australian National University, Canberra, A.C.T. 0200, Australia
Langmuir, 1996, 12 (8), pp 1936–1943
DOI: 10.1021/la950740z
Publication Date (Web): April 17, 1996
Copyright © 1996 American Chemical Society
*

 Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed. Telephone:  (06) 249 4693. FAX:  (06) 249 0732. E-mail:  vvy110@ rsphysse.anu.edu.au.

 On leave from the Institute of Physical Chemistry, The Russian (USSR) Academy of Sciences, Moscow.

 Department of Applied Mathematics, Research School of Physical Sciences and Engineering, Institute of Advanced Studies, The Australian National University.

§

 Department of Chemistry, The Australian National University.

Abstract

Thermodynamic analysis of energy vs distance plots for the interaction of silica and mica surfaces in solutions of CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) and similar surfactants at different concentrations shows that the long range attraction observed around the point of zero charge (pzc) is a charge regulation effect enchanced by the cooperativity of the cationic surfactant adsorption at anionic hydrophilic surfaces. The application of the Gibbs adsorption equation to experimental data shows that in the low concentration regime the adsorption increases with decreasing separation. This is due to an electrostatic contribution to the free energy of adsorption which increases as surfaces approach. An additional adsorption energy gain arises from association of hydrophobic tails when a sufficiently large adsorption density is reached and two-dimensional micellization is enhanced in the gap. A small increase of the electrochemical potential with decreasing separation gives rise to a large increase of adsorption. The double-layer repulsion at long distances corresponds to the ordinary DLVO result as long as changes in adsorption with separation remain small. At smaller separations the potential falls below its initial value because of the cooperative adsorption of the potential-determining ion, which results in the shift of the pzc to lower concentrations at close separations. The interaction is more attractive than would be expected from the constant potential approximation. The interaction pattern determined by equilibrium surfactant adsorption is different from that for nonpolar surfaces in pure water. An enhancement of adsorption in confined geometries is typical of condensation phenomena. A similar mechanism occurs for deposited monolayers of insoluble surfactants.

Article Tools

SciFinder subscribers:  Click to sign in | Not a SciFinder subscriber? Learn more at www.cas.org

History

  • Published In Issue April 17, 1996
  • Received September 8, 1995
    Revised December 15, 1995

Recommend & Share

About Our New Website

Related Content

Other ACS articles by these authors: