J. Am. Chem. Soc., 121 (46), 10788 -10793, 1999. 10.1021/ja991429x S0002-7863(99)01429-8
Web Release Date: November 5, 1999

Copyright © 1999 American Chemical Society

Conformations of [10]Annulene: More Bad News for Density Functional Theory and Second-Order Perturbation Theory

Rollin A. King, T. Daniel Crawford, John F. Stanton, and Henry F. Schaefer, III*

Contribution from the Center for Computational Quantum Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602-2525, and Institute for Theoretical Chemistry, Departments of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712-1167

Received May 3, 1999

Revised Manuscript Received August 30, 1999

Abstract:

The molecular structures and relative energies of several of the lowest-energy conformations of [10]annulene (C10H10) have been investigated using the Hartree-Fock (HF) method, density functional theory (DFT), second-order Mller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2), and (for the first time) coupled cluster singles and doubles with a perturbative inclusion of connected triple excitations [CCSD(T)]. For some years the HF method has been known to incorrectly favor bond-length-alternating structures for [10]annulene, and standard forms of DFT are now seen to incorrectly favor aromatic structures. For the naphthalene-like conformation, the B3LYP method is shown to require a large basis set before the geometry becomes properly bond-localized, i.e., similar to the predictions of CCSD(T) using even a modest basis set. With a basis set of 170 functions, B3LYP and BP86 predict that the aromatic heart-shaped conformation is 9.11 and 12.11 kcal mol-1, respectively, lower than the bond-alternating twist form, while with the same basis set CCSD(T) places the heart-shaped conformation 6.29 kcal mol-1 above the twist. Further large-scale CCSD(T) computations involving 340 basis functions predict that the twist conformation is lowest in energy, and the naphthalene-like and heart-shaped conformations lie higher than the twist by 1.40 and 4.24 kcal mol-1, respectively. Implications of the computed structures and energetics for the interpretation of previous experiments are discussed.


Download the full text: PDF | HTML