Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T23:40:14.698Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determinants of Foreign Aid: The Case of South Korea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2016

Eun Mee Kim  and
Jinhwan Oh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

South Korea, the newest member to join the OECD's Development Assistance Committee, has signaled that it will become a major donor of official development assistance (ODA). Having had its own history of being a large recipient of ODA, South Korea claimed that it will provide aid from the recipient's perspective. Using panel data covering twenty-three years (1987–2009) and 154 recipient countries, we examine whether South Korea's ODA reflects the recipient nation's humanitarian needs more than the donor's interests. We ask three questions: (1) What are the major determinants of South Korea's ODA allocation? (2) Has South Korea's ODA policies changed over different time horizons—that is, years, political regimes? (3) Does South Korea exhibit different standards of allocating ODA for different groups of recipient countries? We find that South Korea provides more aid to higher-income developing countries with higher growth rates, which shows the tendency to serve the donor's economic interests. When we examine the data by time periods, we do not find significant differences over decades or political regimes. However, when we reexamine the data based on recipients' income levels, we find that the relationship between per capita income of the recipient country and ODA allocation is negative only for the middle-income or lower-middle-income group recipients and positive for the rest. This finding suggests the possibility that South Korea's ODA policy may have a dual-track structure.

Keywords

ODA determinantsSouth Koreaemerging donorTobit model
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of East Asian Studies , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , May 2012 , pp. 251 - 274
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina, A., and Dollar, D.. 2000. “Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why?” Journal of Economic Growth 5: 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arvin, , Mak, B., and Drewes, Torben. 2001. “Are There Biases in German Bilateral Aid Allocations?” Applied Economic Letters 8, 3: 173–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthélemy, Jean-Claude, and Tichit, A.. 2004. “Bilateral Donors' Aid Allocation Decisions: A Three-Dimensional Panel Analysis.” International Review of Economics and Finance 13: 253–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, L. D. 1968. The Strategy of Foreign Aid. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Chun, Hong-Min, Lee, Heejin, and Munyi, Elijah N.. 2010. “South Korea as an Emerging Donor: Challenges and Changes on Its Entering OECD/DAC.” Journal of International Development 22, 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cigranelli, D. L. 1993. Ethics, American Foreign Policy and the Third World. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cigranelli, D. L., and Pasquarello, T.. 1985. “Human Rights Practices and the Distribution of Foreign Aid to Latin American Countries.” American Journal of Political Science 29: 539–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooray, N. S., Gottschalk, Ricardo, and Shahiduzzaman, M.. 2005. “Will Japan Increase Aid and Improve Its Allocation to Help the Poorer Countries Achieve the Millennium Development Goals?” IDS Working Paper 243. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
Dollar, D., and Levin, V.. 2004. “The Increasing Selectivity of Foreign Aid, 1984–2002.” Policy Research Working Paper 3299. Washington, DC: World Bank, Development Research Group.Google Scholar
Eberstadt, N. 1988. Foreign Aid and American Purpose. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Export-Import Bank of Korea. 2009. Republic of Korea's ODA Statistics and Reports (in Korean). Seoul: Export-Import Bank of Korea.Google Scholar
Gilpin, R. 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeong, Yu-Ah. 2010. Korea Development Policy Focus (in Korean). Korea International Cooperation Agency.Google Scholar
Kegley, C. W. 1993. “The Neoidealist Moment in International Studies? Realist Myths and the New International Realists.” International Studies Quarterly 37: 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Eun Mee, and Lee, Jae-Eun. 2009. “South-South Development Cooperation: Humanitarian and Global or Merely National?” International Development and Cooperation Review 1, 1: 67–108.Google Scholar
Kim, Gyu Won. 2009. “An Analysis on Korea's ODA Determiants” (in Korean). Master's thesis, Yonsei University.Google Scholar
KOICA (Korea International Cooperation Agency). 2008, 2009, 2010. Aid Statistics (in Korean). Seoul: KOICA Google Scholar
KOICA (Korea International Cooperation Agency). 2011. History of KOICA's Priority Recipient Countries (in Korean). Seoul: KOICA.Google Scholar
Koo, Jeong Woo, and Kim, Daewook. 2011. “World Society and Foreign Aid: Explaining Determinants of Korean ODA, 1989–2007.” Korean Journal of Sociology (in Korean) 45, 1: 153–190.Google Scholar
Lancaster, Carol. 2007. “The Chinese Aid System.” Center for Global Development Essay. Available at www.cgdev.org.Google Scholar
Lee, Kye-woo, and Park, Gi-hoon. 2007. “An Evaluation of Korea's 20-Year ODA.” Korean Development Review 29, 2. (Reprinted in Korea Focus, 2008).Google Scholar
Lum, T., Fischer, H., Gomez-Granger, J., and Leland, A.. 2009. “China's Foreign Aid Activities in Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia.” CRS Report for Congress. Congressional Research Service. Available at www.crs.gov.Google Scholar
Lumsdaine, D. H. 1993. Moral Vision in International Politics: The Foreign Aid Regime, 1949–89. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maizels, A., and Nissanke, M.. 1984. “Motivations for Aid to Developing Countries.” World Development 12, 9: 879–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGillivray, M. 2003. “Modeling Aid Allocation: Issues, Approaches, and Results.” Journal of Economic Development 28, 1: 171–188.Google Scholar
McGillivray, M., and Oczkowski, E.. 1991. “Modelling the Allocation of Australian Bilateral Aid: A Two-Part Sample Selection Approach.” The Economic Record 67: 147–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinlay, R. D., and Little, R.. 1977. “A Foreign Policy Model of U.S. Bilateral Aid Allocation.” World Politics 30, 1: 58–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinlay, R. D., and Little, R.. 1978a. “A Foreign Policy Model of the Distribution of British Bilateral Aid.” British Journal of Political Science 8, 3: 313–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinlay, R. D., and Little, R.. 1978b. “The French Aid Relationship: A Foreign Policy Model of the Distribution of French Bilateral Aid.” Development and Change 9: 459–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinlay, R. D., and Little, R.. 1979. “The U.S. Aid Relationship: A Test of the Recipient Need and Donor Interest Models.” Political Studies 27, 2: 236–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MOFAT (Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade). 2009. Diplomatic White Paper. Seoul: MOFAT.Google Scholar
MOPAN (Multilateral Organization Performance Assessment Network). 2009. 2008 Annual MOPAN Survey Report. Zurich: MOPAN.Google Scholar
Office of the President. 2009. Global Korea: The National Security Strategy of the Republic of Korea , Seoul: Office of the President.Google Scholar
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 2001. DAC Recommendations on Untying ODA to Least Developed Countries. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 2007. 2006 Survey on Monitoring the Paris Declaration, Making Aid More Effective by 2010. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 2008. Special Review on Development Cooperation of the Republic of Korea. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Ortiz, I. 2007. “New Developments in South-South Cooperation: China ODA, Alternative Regionalisms, Banco Del Sur.” New Delhi: International Development Economics Associates (IDEAS).Google Scholar
Potter, D., and Van Belle, D.. 2009. “News Coverage and Japanese Foreign Disaster Aid: A Comparative Example of Bureaucratic Responsiveness to the News Media.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 9, 2: 295–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shishido, S., and Minato, N.. 1994. “A Comparative Study of Official Development Assistance by Major Industrial Countries: An Econometrics Analysis.” Developing Economies 32, 1: 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuman, J. P., and Ayoub, A. S.. 2004. “The Determinants of Japanese Official Development Assistance in Africa: A Pooled Time Series Analysis.” International Interactions 30, 1: 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuman, J. P., and Strand, J. R.. 2006. “The Role of Mercantilism, Humanitarianism, and Gaiatsu in Japan's ODA Programme in Asia.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 6, 1: 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuman, J. P., Strand, J. R., and Emmert, C.. 2009. “The Disbursement Pattern of Japanese Foreign Aid: A Reappraisal.” Journal of East Asian Studies 9, 2: 219–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2011. The Millenium Development Goals Report 2011. New York: UNDP.Google Scholar
You, Woong-Jo. 2009. “An Empirical Study on Korean ODA Policy.” World Regional Studies Review (in Korean) 29, 1: 34–58.Google Scholar