Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T21:16:59.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quality and standards in health care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Donald Irvine  and
Liam Donaldson
Donald Irvine
Affiliation:
Lintonville Medical Group, Ashington, Northumberland
Liam Donaldson
Affiliation:
Northern Regional Health Authority, Newcastle upon Tyne
Get access

Synopsis

The chapter describes the professional and regulatory landmarks which have influenced the development of the quality movement in health care in the UK and the USA. They reflect the similarities and differences in the approach to quality which have evolved within the National Health Service in Britain when compared with a free market system of health care such as that in North America.

A conceptual framework is used to approach the definition and assessment of quality of health care, noting in particular Donabedian's seminal triad of structure, process and outcome as well as the outcomes movement and other theoretical approaches to defining quality.

The characteristics of criteria, standards, guidelines and protocols are described and the terminological problems in this field are discussed. The use of standards for improving quality includes their application in clinical audit, for accreditation and re-accreditation, in contracting for health services and in regulation and inspection.

There is a new and unfolding relationship between clinical standard setting and management. Concepts such as continuous quality improvement and total quality management are challenging traditional assumptions about the need for a separation between professional, consumer and managerial approaches to improving quality. The National Health Service, following implementation of an internal market for public health care provision in Britain, is well placed to absorb and synthesise the many differing philosophies in the health care quality movement to the benefit of both patients and the health professions alike.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 101: Quality Assurance in Medical Care , 1993 , pp. 1 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Medical Association Advisory Committee on PSRO. 1974. Task force on guidelines of care; PSROs and norms of care. Journal of the American Medical Association 229, 161–71.Google Scholar
Audit Commission for Local Authorities and the National Health Service in England and Wales. 1990. A short cut to better services: day surgery in England and Wales. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Audit Commission for Local Authorities and the National Health Service in England and Wales. 1991. The pathology services: a management review. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Audit Commission for Local Authorities and the National Health Service in England and Wales. 1992a. Lying in wait – the use of medical beds in acute hospitals. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Audit Commission for Local Authorities and the National Health Service in England and Wales. 1992b. Minding the quality: a consultation document on the role of the Audit Commission in quality assurance and health care. London: Audit Commission.Google Scholar
Berwick, D. 1989. Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care. New England Journal of Medicine 320, 53–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berwick, D. M., Enthoven, A. & Bunker, J. P. 1992a. Quality management in the NHS: the doctor's role – I. British Medical Journal 304, 235–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berwick, D. M., Enthoven, A. & Bunker, J. B. 1992b. Quality Management in the NHS: the doctor's role – II. British Medical Journal 304, 304–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Black, N. 1990. Quality assurance of medical care. Journal of Public Health Medicine 12, 97–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
British Thoracic Society. 1990a. Guidelines for management of asthma in adults: I – chronic persistent asthma. British Medical Journal 301, 651–3.Google Scholar
British Thoracic Society. 1990b. Guidelines for management of asthma in adults: II – acute severe asthma. British Medical Journal 301, 797–800.Google Scholar
Brook, R. H. 1989. Practice guidelines and practising medicine: are they compatible? Journal of the American Medical Association 262, 3027–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brook, R. H., Avery, A. D., Greenfield, S. 1977. Assessing the quality of medical care using outcome measures: an overview of methods. Medical Care 15 (suppl.), 1–165.Google Scholar
Brooks, T. & Pitt, C. 1990. The quality question: report on the first year of the organisational audit project. London: King's Fund Centre.Google Scholar
Buck, N., Devlin, H. B. & Lunn, J. N. 1988. The report of a confidential enquiry into perioperative deaths. London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust.Google Scholar
Codman, E. A. 1914. The product of a hospital. Surgery, Gynaecology and Obstetrics 18, 491–6.Google Scholar
Charlton, J. R. H. 1985. The avoidable death outcome indicators. In Working towards health. London: DHSS.Google Scholar
Charlton, J. R. H., Hartley, R. M., Silver, R. & Holland, W. W. 1983. Geographical variation in mortality from conditions amenable to medical intervention in England and Wales. Lancet i, 691–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, M. 1983. Perinatal audit: a tried and trusted epidemiological method. Community Medicine 4, 104–7.Google Scholar
Claus, L. M. 1991. Total quality management: a health care application. Total Quality Management 2, 131–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleary, P. D. & McNeil, B. J. 1988. Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality of care. Inquiry 25, 25–36.Google Scholar
Clinical Resource and Auditing Group. 1993. Clinical Guidelines: report of the working group. Edinburgh: Scottish Office Home and Health Department (in press).Google Scholar
Cochrane, A. L. 1972. Effectiveness and efficiency: randon reflections on health services. London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust.Google Scholar
Cook, E. 1913. The life of Florence Nightingale in two volumes. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Deming, W. E. 1986. Out of the crisis. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study.Google Scholar
Deniston, O. L., Rosenstock, I. M. & Getting, B. A. 1968. Evaluation of programme effectiveness. Public Health Reports 83, 323–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Health. 1990. Medical audit in the family practitioner services. Health Circular (FP) (90) 8. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Department of Health. 1991. Medical audit in the hospital and community services. Health Circular 91 (2). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security. 1987. Performance indicators in the NHS: guidance for users. London: DHSS.Google Scholar
Desharnais, S. I., McMahon, L. F., Wroblewski, R. T. & Hogan, A. J. 1990. Measuring hospital performance: the development and validation of risk-adjusted indexes of mortality, readmission and complications. Medical Care 28, 1127–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devlin, H. B. 1990. Audit and the quality of clinical care. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons 72, 3–14.Google ScholarPubMed
Donabedian, A. 1966. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 4, 166–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donabedian, A. 1980. The definition of quality: a conceptual exploration. In Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring. Volume I: The definition of quality and its approaches to its assessment. Ann Arbor: Health Administration Press.Google Scholar
Donabedian, A. 1982. Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring. Volume II: The criteria and standards of quality. Ann Arbor: Health Administration Press.Google Scholar
Donabedian, A. 1989. Institutional and professional responsibilities in quality assurance. Quality Assurance in Health Care 1, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donaldson, L. J. 1992. Health and health care of elderly people: current issues. In: The health of elderly people. An epidemiological overview – companion papers. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Donaldson, L. J. & Jagger, C. Survival and functional capacity: three-year follow-up of an elderly population in hospitals and homes. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 37, 176–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eddy, D. M. 1990a. Clinical decision making: from theory to practice – the challenge. Journal of the American Medical Association 263, 287–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eddy, D. M. 1990b. Clinical decision making: from theory to practice – anatomy of a decision. Journal of the American Medical Association 263, 441–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eddy, D. M. 1990c. Clinical decision making: from theory to practice: practice policies – what are they? Journal of the American Medical Association 263, 877–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellwood, P. M. 1988. Outcomes management: a technology of patient experience. New England Journal of Medicine 318, 1549–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epstein, A. M. 1990. The outcomes movement: will it get us where we want to go? New England Journal of Medicine 323, 266–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fielding, J. E. 1983. Lessons from health care regulation. Annual Review of Public Health 4, 91–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flexner, A. 1910. Medical education in the United States and Canada: report to Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. New York: Merrymount Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowkes, F. G. R. 1985. Strategies for changing the use of diagnostic radiology. London: King's Fund.Google Scholar
Gleichner, N. 1984. Cesarean section rates: the short-term failure of the national consensus development conferences in 1980. Journal of the American Medical Association 252, 3273–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottlieb, L. K., Margolis, C. Z. & Schoenbaum, S. C. 1990. Clinical practice guidelines at an HMO: development and implementation in a quality improvement model. Quarterly Review Bulletin 16, 80–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, G. P., Gregory, D. A. & Van Zwanenberg, T. D. 1985. The development of a limited formulary for general practice. Lancet i, 1030–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, B. G. 1968. Evaluation of social programmes. Review of the International Statistical Institute 36, 260–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grol, R., Mokkink, H. & Schellevis, F. 1988. The effects of peer review in general practice. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 38, 10–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Hampton, J. R. 1983. The end of clinical freedom. British Medical Journal 287, 1237–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, C. M., Jarman, B., Woodman, E., White, P. & Fry, J. S. 1984. Prescribing – a suitable case for treatment. Occasional Paper 24. London: RCGP.Google ScholarPubMed
Haynes, R. B., Davis, D. A., McKibbon, A. & Tugwell, P. 1984. A critical appraisal of the efficacy of continuing medical education. Journal of the American Medical Association 251, 61–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Health Advisory Service. 1984. H C (84) 116. London: DHSS.Google Scholar
Heasman, M. A. 1970. Scottish consultant review of in-practice statistics (SCRIPS). Scottish Medical Journal 15, 386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horder, J., Mourin, K., Pendleton, D. & Russell, I. T. 1986. Terminology of performance. In Pendleton, D., Schofield, T. & Marinker, M. (Eds) In pursuit of quality. London: RCGP.Google Scholar
Hulka, B. S., Romm, F. J., Parkerson, G. R., Russell, I. T., Clapp, N. E. & Johnson, F. S. 1979. Peer review in ambulatory care: use of implicit criteria and explicit judgements. Medical Care 17 (Suppl.) 1–73.Google Scholar
Irvine, D. H. 1990. Managing for quality in general practice. London: King's Fund Centre.Google ScholarPubMed
Irvine, D. H. & Irvine, S. (Eds) 1990. Making sense of audit. Oxford: Radcliffe Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, D. H., Russell, I. T., Hutchinson, A., Barton, A., Foy, C. & Haines, E. 1986. Educational development and evaluation in the northern region. In Pendleton, D., Schofield, T. & Marinker, M. (Eds) In pursuit of quality, pp. 146–67. London: RCGP.Google Scholar
Irvine, S. 1992. The manager in practice – balancing dreams and discipline. London: RCGP.Google Scholar
Jacoby, I. 1985. The consensus development programmes of the national institutes of health: current practices and historical perspectives. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2, 420–32.Google Scholar
Jacoby, I. 1988. Evidence and consensus. Journal of the American Medical Association 259, 3039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joint Commission of Accreditation of Health Care Organisations (JCAHO). 1989a. Accreditations manual for hospitals. Chicago: JCAHO.Google Scholar
Joint Commission of Accreditation of Health Care Organisations (JCAHO). 1989b. Quality assurance in managed health care organisations. Chicago: JCAHO.Google Scholar
Joint Commission of Accreditation of Health Care Organisations (JCAHO). 1989c. Ambulatory health care standards manual. Chicago: JCAHO.Google Scholar
Juran, J. M. 1964. Managerial breakthrough. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Kanouse, D. E., Winkler, J. D. & Kosecoff, J. 1989. Changing medical practice through technology assessment: an account of the NHS Consensus Programme. Ann Arbor: Health Administration Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, S. H. & Ware, J. E. 1989. The patient's role in health care and quality assessment. In Goldfield, N. & Nash, D. B. (Eds) Providing quality care: the challenge to clinicians. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians.Google Scholar
Laffel, G. & Blumenthal, G. 1989. The case for using quality management science in health care organisations. Quality Management Science 262, 2869–73.Google Scholar
Lancet Editorial. 1990. NCEPOD and perioperative deaths of children. Lancet 335, 1498–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. A. H., Morrison, S. L. & Morris, J. N. 1960. Case fatality in teaching and non-teaching hospitals. Lancet i, 170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohr, K. N. 1988. Outcome measurement: concepts and questions. Inquiry 25, 37–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Lohr, K. N. & Marquis, M. S. 1984. Medicare and Medicaid: past, present and future. Note N-2008-HHS/RC. Santa Monica: The Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
Lohr, K. N. & Schroeder, S. A. 1990. A strategy for quality assurance in Medicare. New England Journal of Medicine 322, 707–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lomas, J. 1986. The consensus process and evidence dissemination. Canadian Medical Association Journal 134, 1340–1.Google ScholarPubMed
Lomas, J. & Haynes, R. B. 1988. A taxonomy and clinical review of tested strategies for the application of clinical practice recommendation: from ‘official’ to ‘individual’ clinical policy. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 4, 77–94.Google ScholarPubMed
Lomas, J., Anderson, G. M. & Dominick-Pierre, K. 1989. Do practice guidelines guide practice? New England Journal of Medicine 321, 1306–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAuliffe, W. A. 1978. Studies of process–outcome correlations in medical care evaluations: a critique. Medical Care 16, 907–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, R. 1984. Quality assessment in health. British Medical Journal 288, 1470–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, M. W. & Fowkes, F. G. R. 1985. Audit reviewed: does feedback on performance change clinical behaviour? Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London 19, 251–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Mugford, M., Banfield, P. & O'Hanlon, M. 1991. Effects of feedback of information on clinical practice: a review. British Medical Journal 303, 398–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Neuhauser, D. 1990. Ernest Amory Codman, MD, and the end results of medical care. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 6, 307–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New York Times. March 12, 1986.Google Scholar
North of England Study of Standards and Performance in General Practice. 1990. Final Report: I – Setting clinical standards within small groups. Newcastle upon Tyne: Health Care Research Unit.Google Scholar
North of England Study of Standards and Performance in General Practice. 1992a. Medical audit in practice: effects on doctors' clinical behaviour for common childhood conditions. British Medical Journal 304, 1480–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North of England Study of Standards and Performance in General Practice. 1992b. Medical audit in practice: effects on the health of patients with common childhood conditions. British Medical Journal 304, 1484–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Leary, D. S. 1991. Accreditation in the quality improvement mould: a vision for tomorrow. Quarterly Review Bulletin 17, 71–7.Google Scholar
Palmer, R. H., Louis, T. A., Hsu, L. N. et al. 1985. A randomised controlled trial of quality assurance in sixteen ambulatory care practices. Medical Care 23, 751–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, S. 1987. The NIH consensus development programme: a decade later. New England Journal of Medicine 317, 485–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reports on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in England and Wales, 1952/1954, 1955/57, 1958/60, 1961/63, 1964/66, 1967/69. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Robbins, J. A. & Donaldson, L. J. 1985. Analysing stages of care in hospital stay for fractured neck of femur. Lancet 1, 1028–9.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. S., Radany, M. H. & Nash, D. B. 1988. Privilege delineation in a demanding new environment. Annals of Internal Medicine 108, 880–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosser, R. M. & Kind, P. A. 1978. A scale of valuations of states of illness: is there a social consensus? International Journal of Epidemiology 7, 347–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosser, R. M. & Watts, V. C. 1972. The measurement of hospital output. International Journal of Epidemiology 1, 361–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal College of General Practitioners. 1985. Quality in general practice. Policy Statement 2. London: RCGP.Google Scholar
Royal College of General Practitioners. 1990. Fellowship by assessment. Occasional Paper 50. London: RCGP.Google Scholar
Royal College of Nursing. 1990. Quality patient care: the dynamic standard setting system. London: RCN.Google Scholar
Royal College of Physicians. 1991. Guidelines for the management of urinary tract infection in childhood. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London 25, 36–41.Google Scholar
Royal College of Radiologists. 1989. Making the best use of a department of radiology: guidelines for doctors. London: RCR.Google Scholar
Rutstein, D. D., Berenberg, W., Chalmers, T. C., Child, C. G., Fishman, A. P. & Perrin, E. B. 1976. Measuring the quality of health care; a clinical method. New England Journal of Medicine 294, 582–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saltman, R. B. 1990. Competition and reform in the Swedish health system. Milbank Quarterly 68, 597–618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanazaro, P. J. & Worth, R. M. 1978. Concurrent quality assurance in hospital care: report of a study by private initiative in PSRO. New England Journal of Medicine 298, 1171–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schoenbaum, S. C. & Gottlieb, L. K. 1990. Algorithm based improvement of clinical quality. British Medical Journal 301, 1374–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schut, F. T., Greenberg, W. & Van de Ven, W. P. M. M. 1991. Antitrust policy in the Dutch health care system and the relevance of EEC competition policy and US antitrust practice. Health Policy 17, 257–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, J. S. & Lurie, N. 1990. Assessment of medical outcomes. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 6, 333–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Secretaries of State for Health, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. 1989. Working for patients (Cmnd 555). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Secretary of State for Health. 1991. The patient's charter: raising the standard. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Secretary of State for Health. 1992. Clinical standards advisory group. Hansard 1992; 201, col. 627.Google Scholar
Secretary of State for Health and Welsh Office. 1989. General Practice in the National Health Service: the 1990 contract. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Sketris, I. 1988. Health service accreditation: an international review. London: King's Fund.Google Scholar
Spilker, B., Molirek, F. R., Johnston, K. A., Simpson, R. L. & Tolson, H. 1990. Quality of life: bibliography and indexes. Medical Care (Suppl.) 28, 1–77.Google ScholarPubMed
Stocking, B., Jennett, B. & Spilby, J. 1991. Criteria for change: the history and impact of consensus development conferences in the UK. London: King's Fund Centre.Google Scholar
Thomson, H. C. & Osbourne, C. E. 1974. Development of criteria for quality assurance of ambulatory child health care. Medical Care 12, 807–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tresrowski, B. R. 1988. The current interest in quality is nothing new. Inquiry 25, 3–5.Google Scholar
UCLA Experimental Medical Review Organisation. 1976. The atlas: UCLA EMRCO criteria mapping system. University of California at Los Angeles: Center for Health Services Research.Google Scholar
Vladeck, B. C. 1988. Quality assurance through external controls. Inquiry 25, 100–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Vuori, H. V. 1972. Quality assurance of health services: concepts and methodology. WHO Regional Office for Europe. Copenhagen: WHO.Google Scholar
Vuori, H. V. 1989. Research needs in quality assurance. Assurance in Health Care 1, 147–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wennberg, J. E., Blowers, L., Parker, R. & Gittelshohn, A. M. 1977. Changes in tonsillectomy rates associated with feedback and review. Paediatrics 59, 821–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, A. 1974. Measuring the effectiveness of health care systems. British Journal of Preventative and Social Medicine 28, 196–202.Google ScholarPubMed
Williams, A. 1985. Economics of coronary artery by-pass grafting. British Medical Journal 291, 326–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirtschafter, D. D., Summers, J., Jackson, J. R., Brooks, C. M. & Turner, M. 1986. Continuing medical education using clinical algorithms: a controlled-trial assessment of effect on neonatal care. American Journal of Diseases of Childhood 140, 791–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHO Working Group. 1989. The principles of quality assurance. Quality Assurance in Health Care 1, 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar