Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T16:12:34.984Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Importance of regional diversity and environmental conditions on local species richness of aquatic macro-invertebrates in tropical forested streams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2014

Salman Abdo Al-Shami ,
Che Salmah Md Rawi ,
Abu Hassan Ahmad ,
Madziatul Rosemahanie Madrus  and
Khalid AL Mutairi
Salman Abdo Al-Shami*
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Penang, Malaysia Biology Department, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia
Che Salmah Md Rawi
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Penang, Malaysia
Abu Hassan Ahmad
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Penang, Malaysia
Madziatul Rosemahanie Madrus
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Penang, Malaysia
Khalid AL Mutairi
Affiliation:
Biology Department, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia
*
1Corresponding author. Email: alshami200@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

We used aquatic macro-invertebrates as a model to investigate the relationship between the regional species richness (RSR) and local species richness (LSR) in Peninsular Malaysia. A total of 38 streams (local scale) in seven catchments (regional scale), were sampled for aquatic macro-invertebrates. Eleven environmental variables (i.e. pH, DO, velocity, temperature, width, depth, TSS, BOD, COD, ammonia and canopy cover) were measured to assess their importance for local species richness. The average species richness was 34.9 species per region and the average abundance was 1380 individual per region. The highest number of species was 41, while the lowest species richness was 31. We applied local-regional richness regression models to explore the nature of the RSR–LSR relationship and then used variation partitioning to determine the relative importance of RSR and environmental conditions on LSR. We found a linear RSR–LSR relationship, which indicates unsaturated communities for macro-invertebrates in Malaysian streams and absence of local control with strong effects of regional processes. Variation in LSR explained by RSR was 43%, while the variation fraction in LSR explained by environmental conditions was low (2%) and not significant. We conclude that the variation in LSR is mainly controlled by the regional diversity pool (i.e. RSR) for aquatic macro-invertebrates in Peninsular Malaysia. However, weak effects of environmental conditions may reflect relatively low variability in the habitat among investigated streams. Further studies at larger scales, and involving different regions in this area, will be useful to draw comprehensive conclusions about determinants of local species diversity for stream invertebrates.

Keywords

diversityenvironmental conditionslocal species richnessMalaysiaregional species richness
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , July 2014 , pp. 335 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

AL-SHAMI, S. A., MD RAWI, C. S., AHMAD, A. H., ABDUL HAMID, S. & MOHD NOR, S. A. 2011. Influence of agricultural, industrial, and anthropogenic stresses on the distribution and diversity of macroinvertebrates in Juru River Basin, Penang, Malaysia. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 74:1195–1202.Google Scholar
AL-SHAMI, S. A., CHE SALMAH, M., ABU HASSAN, A. & MADRUS, M. R. 2013a. Biodiversity of stream insects in the Malaysian Peninsula: spatial patterns and environmental constraints. Ecological Entomology 38:238–249.Google Scholar
AL‐SHAMI, S. A., HEINO, J., CHE SALMAH, M., ABU HASSAN, A., SUHAILA, A. & MADRUS, M. R. 2013b. Drivers of beta diversity of macroinvertebrate communities in tropical forest streams. Freshwater Biology 58:1126–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ANGERMEIER, P. L. & WINSTON, M. R. 1998. Local vs. regional influences on local diversity in stream fish communities of Virginia. Ecology 79:911–927.Google Scholar
BALTZ, D. M., VONDRACEK, B., BROWN, L. R. & MOYLE, P. B. 1991. Seasonal changes in microhabitat selection by rainbow trout in a small stream. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 120:166–176.Google Scholar
BARBOUR, M. T., GERRITSEN, J., SNYDER, B. & STRIBLING, J. 1999. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish. (Second edition). EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
CALEY, M. J. & SCHLUTER, D. 1997. The relationship between local and regional diversity. Ecology 78:70–80.Google Scholar
CANNING-CLODE, J., BELLOU, N., KAUFMANN, M. J. & WAHL, M. 2009. Local–regional richness relationship in fouling assemblages – effects of succession. Basic and Applied Ecology 10:745–753.Google Scholar
CHE SALMAH, M., ABU HASSAN, A. & JONGKAR, G. 2004. Records on distribution of aquatic insects in Pantai Acheh forest reserve, Penang Island, Malaysia. Journal of Bioscience 15:123–134.Google Scholar
CHE SALMAH, M. R., AL-SHAMI, S. A., MADRUS, M. R. & AHMAD, A. H. 2013. Local effects of forest fragmentation on diversity of aquatic insects in tropical forest streams: implications for biological conservation. Aquatic Ecology 47:75–85.Google Scholar
CHE SALMAH, M. R., AL-SHAMI, S. A., MADRUS, M. R. & AHMAD, A. H. 2014a. Biological and ecological diversity of aquatic macroinvertebrates in response to hydrological and physicochemical parameters in tropical forest streams of Gunung Tebu, Malaysia: implications for ecohydrological assessment. Ecohydrology 7: 496–507.Google Scholar
CHE SALMAH, M. R., AL-SHAMI, S. A., AHMAD, A. H., MADRUS, M. R. & NURL HUDA, A. 2014b. Distribution of detritivores in tropical forest streams of Peninsular Malaysia: role of temperature, canopy cover and altitude variability. International Journal of Biometeorology (in press). doi: 10.1007/s00484-013-0648-9.Google Scholar
CORNELL, H. 1999. Unsaturation and regional influences on species richness in ecological communities: a review of the evidence. Ecoscience 6:303–315.Google Scholar
CORNELL, H. V. & KARLSON, R. H. 1997. Local and regional processes as controls of species richness. Pp. 250–268 in Tilman, D. & Kareiva, P. (eds.). Spatial ecology: the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
CORNELL, H. V. & LAWTON, J. H. 1992. Species interactions, local and regional processes, and limits to the richness of ecological communities: a theoretical perspective. Journal of Animal Ecology 61:1–12.Google Scholar
CORNELL, H., KARLSON, R. & HUGHES, T. 2008. Local–regional species richness relationships are linear at very small to large scales in west-central Pacific corals. Coral Reefs 27:145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DUDGEON, D. 2008. Tropical stream ecology. Elsevier, London. 370 pp.Google Scholar
FIELD, R., HAWKINS, B. A., CORNELL, H. V., CURRIE, D. J., DINIZ‐FILHO, J. A. F., GUÉGAN, J. F., KAUFMAN, D. M., KERR, J. T., MITTELBACH, G. G. & OBERDORFF, T. 2009. Spatial species‐richness gradients across scales: a meta‐analysis. Journal of Biogeography 36:132–147.Google Scholar
GRIFFITHS, D. 1997. Local and regional species richness in North American lacustrine fish. Journal of Animal Ecology 66:49–56.Google Scholar
GRIFFITHS, D. 1999. On investigating local–regional species richness relationships. Journal of Animal Ecology 68:1051–1055.Google Scholar
GRONROOS, M. & HEINO, J. 2012. Species richness at the guild level: effects of species pool and local environmental conditions on stream macroinvertebrate communities. Journal of Animal Ecology 81:679–691.Google Scholar
HARDING, J., BENFIELD, E., BOLSTAD, P., HELFMAN, G. & JONES, E. 1998. Stream biodiversity: the ghost of land use past. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 95:14843–14847.Google Scholar
HEINO, J. & SOININEN, J. 2007. Are higher taxa adequate surrogates for species-level assemblage patterns and species richness in stream organisms? Biological Conservation 137:78–89.Google Scholar
HEINO, J., MUOTKA, T. & PAAVOLA, R. 2003. Determinants of macroinvertebrate diversity in headwater streams: regional and local influences. Journal of Animal Ecology 72:425–434.Google Scholar
HILLEBRAND, H. 2005. Regressions of local on regional diversity do not reflect the importance of local interactions or saturation of local diversity. Oikos 110:195–198.Google Scholar
HUGUENY, B. & PAUGY, D. 1995. Unsaturated fish communities in African rivers. American Naturalist 146:162–169.Google Scholar
HUSTON, M. A. 1994. Biological diversity: the coexistence of species on changing landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 681 pp.Google Scholar
JACKSON, D. A. & HARVEY, H. H. 1989. Biogeographic associations in fish assemblages: local vs. regional processes. Ecology 70:1472–1484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KRASNOV, B. R., STANKO, M., KHOKHLOVA, I. S., MIKLISOVA, D., MORAND, S., SHENBROT, G. I. & POULIN, R. 2006. Relationships between local and regional species richness in flea communities of small mammalian hosts: saturation and spatial scale. Parasitology Research 98:403–413.Google Scholar
LEIBOLD, M., HOLYOAK, M., MOUQUET, N., AMARASEKARE, P., CHASE, J., HOOPES, M., HOLT, R., SHURIN, J., LAW, R. & TILMAN, D. 2004. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi‐scale community ecology. Ecology Letters 7:601–613.Google Scholar
MORSE, J. C., YANG, L. & TIAN, L. 1994. Aquatic insects of China useful for monitoring water quality. Hohai University Press, China.Google Scholar
OBERDORFF, T., HUGUENY, B., COMPIN, A. & BELKESSAM, D. 1998. Non-interactive fish communities in the coastal streams of North-western France. Journal of Animal Ecology 67:472–484.Google Scholar
PALMER, M. A., ALLAN, J. D. & BUTMAN, C. A. 1996. Dispersal as a regional process affecting the local dynamics of marine and stream benthic invertebrates. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11:322–326.Google Scholar
PERES-NETO, P. R. 2004. Patterns in the co-occurrence of fish species in streams: the role of site suitability, morphology and phylogeny versus species interactions. Oecologia 140:352–360.Google Scholar
PLATTS, W. S., MEGAHAN, W. F. & MINSHALL, G. W. 1983. Methods for evaluating stream, riparian, and biotic conditions. General technical report, INT-138. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden. 70 pp.Google Scholar
POFF, N. L. 1997. Landscape filters and species traits: towards mechanistic understanding and prediction in stream ecology. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16:391–409.Google Scholar
RICKLEFS, R. E. 2000. The relationship between local and regional species richness in birds of the Caribbean Basin. Journal of Animal Ecology 69:1111–1116.Google Scholar
ROSENZWEIG, M. L. 1995. Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 460 pp.Google Scholar
SHURIN, J. B. & ALLEN, E. G. 2001. Effects of competition, predation, and dispersal on species richness at local and regional scales. American Naturalist 158:624–637.Google Scholar
SHURIN, J. B., HAVEL, J. E., LEIBOLD, M. A. & PINEL-ALLOUL, B. 2000. Local and regional zooplankton species richness: a scale-independent test for saturation. Ecology 81:3062–3073.Google Scholar
SOININEN, J., HEINO, J., KOKOCINSKI, M. & MUOTKA, T. 2009. Local–regional diversity relationship varies with spatial scale in lotic diatoms. Journal of Biogeography 36:720–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SRIVASTAVA, D. S. 1999. Using local–regional richness plots to test for species saturation: pitfalls and potentials. Journal of Animal Ecology 68:1–16.Google Scholar
STENDERA, S. E. S. & JOHNSON, R. K. 2005. Additive partitioning of aquatic invertebrate species diversity across multiple spatial scales. Freshwater Biology 50:1360–1375.Google Scholar
STOUT, J. & VANDERMEER, J. 1975. Comparison of species richness for stream-inhabiting insects in tropical and mid-latitude streams. American Naturalist 109:263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TONN, W. M., MAGNUSON, J. J., RASK, M. & TOIVONEN, J. 1990. Intercontinental comparison of small-lake fish assemblages: the balance between local and regional processes. American Naturalist 136:345–375.Google Scholar
VENABLES, W. N. & RIPLEY, B. D. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S. Springer Verlag, New York. 113 pp.Google Scholar
VINSON, M. R. & HAWKINS, C. P. 1998. Biodiversity of stream insects: variation at local, basin, and regional scales. Annual Review of Entomology 43:271–293.Google Scholar
VINSON, M. R. & HAWKINS, C. P. 2003. Broad-scale geographical patterns in local stream insect genera richness. Ecography 26:751–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WHITE, E. P. & HURLBERT, A. H. 2010. The combined influence of the local environment and regional enrichment on bird species richness. American Naturalist 175:E35–E43.Google Scholar
WITMAN, J. D., ETTER, R. J. & SMITH, F. 2004. The relationship between regional and local species diversity in marine benthic communities: a global perspective. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 101:15664–15669.Google Scholar
YULE, C. & YONG, H. 2004. Freshwater invertebrates of the Malaysian Region. Akademi Sains Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur. 861 pp.Google Scholar