Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-04T11:34:17.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Household Enumeration in National Discourse

Three Moments in Modern Japanese History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Jennifer A. Winther
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Enumeration, even the contemporary census, cannot be characterized as neutral and objective data collection; official categories both shape and are shaped by national cultures. This article examines the forms, laws, and procedures of Japanese household registration (koseki) and national censuses in three cases from the modern period (1868 to post-World War II). Each case isolates a particular time period to show how broad political cultures, such as Westernization, the development of state welfare, and democratization, were codified or reflected discursively in enumerative programs. In each case, categories shifted the substantive and practical meanings of individuals in families and of household heads in relation to the state. In the early Meiji period (1868-1912), an aristocratic, head-centric social order was imposed on all classes through household registration. By the late Meiji and through the Taisho (1912-36) and early Showa periods (1936-89), census categories reflected a new household model based on economic and spatial relations. In the reconstruction period following World War II, the household register embodied the dramatic changes to the civil code that established equality of sexes and the nuclear family as the fundamental social unit. By the 1960s, however, census forms reflected a return of national cultural discourse to hierarchical, extended-stem family households.

Type
Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , Spring 2008 , pp. 19 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2008 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aihara, S., Samejima, T., Ishikawa, K., and Isumi, T. (1971) Toukei nihon keizei—keizai hattatuten wo toshitemita nihon toukeishi. Tokyo: Chikuma Shobo.Google Scholar
Alford, R. R., and Friedland, R. (1985) Powers of Theory: Capitalism, the State, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allinson, G. (1993) “Citizenship, fragmentation, and negotiated polity,” in Sone, Y. (ed.) Political Dynamics in Contemporary Japan. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press: 17–49.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. (1991) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. J., and Fienberg, S. E. (1999) Who Counts? The Politics of Census-Taking in Contemporary America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Asad, T. (1994) “Ethnographic representation, statistics, and modern power.” Social Research 61: 55–89.Google Scholar
Beasley, W. G. (1989) “Meiji political institutions,” in Jansen, M. B. (ed.) The Cambridge History of Japan: The Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 618–73.Google Scholar
Bengtsson, T., Campbell, C., and Lee, J. Z. (2004) Life under Pressure: Mortality and Living Standards in Europe and Asia, 1700-1900. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bengtsson, T., and Saito, O., eds. (2000) Population and Economy: From Hunger to Modern Economic Growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berger, P. L., and Luckmann, T. (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Boling, P. (1998) “Family policy in Japan.” Journal of Social Policy 27: 173–90.Google Scholar
Bowker, G., and Star, S. L. (1999) Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bryant, T. L. (1991) “For the sake of the country, for the sake of the family: The oppressive impact of family registration on women and minorities in Japan.” UCLA Law Review 39: 109–68.Google Scholar
Calder, K. E. (1988) Crisis and Compensation: Public Policy and Political Stability in Japan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Central Statistics Bureau (1972a) Sourifu toukeikyoku hyakunenshi shiryou shusei. Vol. 1 (Jo). Tokyo: Government of Japan.Google Scholar
Central Statistics Bureau (1972b) Sourifu toukeikyoku hyakunenshi shiryou shusei. Vol. 2 (Chuu). Tokyo: Government of Japan.Google Scholar
Central Statistics Bureau (1972c) Sourifu toukeikyoku hyakunenshi shiryou shusei. Vol. 3 (Ge). Tokyo: Government of Japan.Google Scholar
Chen, I.-t. (1968) “Japanese colonialism in Korea and Formosa: A comparison of its effects upon the development of nationalism.” PhD diss., University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Christy, A. S. (1993) “The making of imperial subjects in Okinawa.” positions: east asia cultures critique 1: 607–39.Google Scholar
Coleman, S. (1983) Family Planning in Japanese Society: Traditional Birth Control in a Modern Urban Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cornell, L. L., and Hayami, A. (1986) “The shumon aratame cho: Japan’s population registers.” Journal of Family History 11: 311–28.Google Scholar
Curtis, B. (2001) The Politics of Population: State Formation, Statistics, and the Census of Canada, 1840-1875. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
de Becker, J. E. (1979a) Elements of Japanese Law. Washington, DC: University Publications of America.Google Scholar
de Becker, J. E. (1979b) Principles and Practice of the Civil Code of Japan. Washington, DC: University Publications of America.Google Scholar
Desrosières, A. (1998) The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dower, J. W. (1993) “Peace and democracy in two systems: External policy and internal conflict,” in Gordon, A. (ed.) Postwar Japan as History. Berkeley: University of California Press: 3–33.Google Scholar
Emigh, R. J. (2002) “Numeracy or enumeration? The uses of numbers by states and societies.” Social Science History 26: 653–98.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1979) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1980) The History of Sexuality. Vol. 1, An Introduction. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Gieryn, T. (1983) “Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists.” American Sociological Review 48: 781–95.Google Scholar
Gieryn, T. (1999) Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gutmann, M. P., and Walle, E. v. d. (1978) “New sources for social and demographic history: The Belgian population registers.” Social Science History 2: 121–43.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1986) “Making up people,” in Deller, L. (ed.) Reconstructing Individualism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press: 222–36.Google Scholar
Hammel, E. A., and Laslett, P. (1974) “Comparing household structure over time and between cultures.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 16: 73–109.Google Scholar
Hanley, S. B. (1972) “Toward an analysis of demographic and economic change in Tokugawa Japan: A village study.” Journal of Asian Studies 31: 515–37.Google Scholar
Hareven, T. K. (1991) “The history of the family and the complexity of social change.” American Historical Review 96: 95–124.Google Scholar
Hareven, T. K. (1994) “Aging and generational relations: A historical and life course approach.” Annual Review of Sociology 20: 437–61.Google Scholar
Hayami, A. (1970) “Rekishi jinkogaku no atarashii hoho—family reconstruction—nit-suite.” Nihon jinko gakkai kaiho 4: 57–59.Google Scholar
Hayami, A. (1980) “Illegitimacy in Japan,” in Laslett, P. (ed.) Bastardy and Its Comparative History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press: 397–402.Google Scholar
Hayami, A. (1986) “Another fossa magna: Proportion marrying and age at marriage in late nineteenth-century Japan.” Journal of Family History 12: 57–72.Google Scholar
Hayami, A. (2001) The Historical Demography of Pre-modern Japan. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Hayami, A., and Uchida, N. (1972) “Size of household in a Japanese county throughout the Tokugawa era,” in Laslett, P. (ed.) Household and Family in Past Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 473–515.Google Scholar
Herlihy, D. (1985) Medieval Households. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, C. (1987) “The meaning and measurement of ethnicity in Malaysia: An analysis of census classifications.” Journal of Asian Studies. 46: 555–82.Google Scholar
Ishii, R. (1981) Ie to koseki no rekishi. Tokyo: Koubunsha.Google Scholar
Jannetta, A. B., and Preston, S. H. (1991) “Two centuries of mortality change in central Japan: The evidence from a temple death register.” Population Studies. 45: 417–36.Google Scholar
Kamagai, F. (1986) “Modernization and the family in Japan.” Journal of Family History 11: 371–84.Google Scholar
Kasza, G. J. (2002) “War and welfare policy in Japan.” Journal of Asian Studies 61: 417–35.Google Scholar
Kelman, S. (1987) “The political foundations of American statistical policy,” in Alonso, W. and Starr, P. (eds.) The Politics of Numbers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation: 275–302.Google Scholar
Kertzer, D. I. (1991) “Household history and sociological theory.” Annual Review of Sociology 17: 155–79.Google Scholar
Koseki jitsumu kenkyuukai (2000) Koseki roppou. Tokyo: Teihan Kabushiki Kaisha.Google Scholar
Koyama, S. (1999) Katei no seisei to josei no kokuminka. Tokyo: Keisou Shobo.Google Scholar
Kumagai, F. (1986) “Modernization and the family in Japan.” Journal of Family History 11: 371–84.Google Scholar
Laslett, P. (1987) “The character of familial history, its limitations, and the conditions for its proper pursuit.” Journal of Family History 12: 263–84.Google Scholar
Laslett, P., ed. (1972) Household and Family in Past Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B., and Woolgar, S. (1996) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Longino, H. E. (1990) Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Loveman, M. (2001) “Nation-state building, ‘race,’ and the production of official statistics: Brazil in comparative perspective.” PhD diss., University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Mann, M. (1986) The Sources of Social Power. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. (2001) Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mitsuru, H. (1986) “Ie, the world women make.” Journal of Family History 11: 353–70.Google Scholar
Mosk, C. (1981) “The evolution of the pre-modern demographic regime in Japan.” Population Studies 35: 28–52.Google Scholar
Muta, K. (1998) “Kazoku seido: Hendouron no kazoku shakai gaku ni okeru imi to igi.” Kazoku Shakai gaku kenkyuu 10: 111–38.Google Scholar
Nagaya, S., Kaneko, J., and Uefuji, I. (1999) Toukei to toukei riron no shakaiteki keisei. Sapporo, Japan: Hokkaidou Daigaku Tosho Kankokai.Google Scholar
Nakane, C. (1972) “An interpretation of the size and structure of the household in Japan over three centuries,” in Laslett, P. (ed.) Household and Family in Past Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 517–43.Google Scholar
kenkyusho, Nihon toukei (1960) Nihon toukei hattatushi. Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai.Google Scholar
Nobles, M. (2000) Shades of Citizenship: Race and the Census in Modern Politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ochiai, E. (1997) Nijuuisseiki no kazoku e. Tokyo: Yuhikaku.Google Scholar
Oda, H., and Stickings, S. (1997) Basic Japanese Law. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Office of Population Research (OPR) (1946) “The statistical system: Evolution to 1868. Supplement: Guide to the official demographic statistics of Japan proper, 1868-1945.” Population Indexes 12: 5–19.Google Scholar
Ohta, T. e. a. (1971) Konin no todokede: Todokedeshugi no genjou to naien mondai. Kyoto: Yuhikaku.Google Scholar
Ooms, H. (1996) Tokugawa Village Practice: Class, Status, Power, Law. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Osaka shi minsei i’in renmei (Minsei) (1988) Osakashi minsei i’in seido nanajyunenshi. Osaka, Japan: Nihon houki shuppan kabushikigaisha.Google Scholar
Patriarca, S. (1996) Numbers and Nationhood: Writing Statistics in Nineteenth-Century Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, T. M. (1986) The Rise of Statistical Thinking, 1820-1900. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, T. M. (1995) Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Political Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Prewitt, K. (1987) “Public statistics and democratic politics,” in Alonso, W. and Starr, P. (eds.) The Politics of Numbers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation: 261–74.Google Scholar
Ruggles, S. (1991) “Comparability of the public use files of the U.S. census of population, 1880-1980.” Social Science History 15: 123–58.Google Scholar
Ruggles, S. (1994) “The transformation of American family structure.” American Historical Review 99: 103–28.Google Scholar
Ruggles, S. (1999) “The limitations of English family reconstitution: English population history from family reconstitution, 1580-1837.” Continuity and Change 14: 105–30.Google Scholar
Ruggles, S. (2003) “Measurement of household and family composition in the United States, 1850-2000.” Population and Development Review 29: 73–101.Google Scholar
Saito, O. (1996) “Historical demography: Achievements and prospects.” Population Studies 50: 537–53.Google Scholar
Saito, O. (1998) “Two kinds of stem-family system? Traditional Japan and Europe compared.” Continuity and Change 13: 167–86.Google Scholar
Samejima, T. (1971) Meiji ishin to toukeigaku. Tokyo: Chikuma Shobo.Google Scholar
Sato, M. (2002) Kokusei chousa to nihon kindai. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Senda, Y. (1999) “Kazoku shakaigaku no mondai kousei.” Shakaigaku Hyouron 50: 91–104.Google Scholar
Shimizu, H. (2002) “Setai gainen to setai bunrui no henkou.” Toukei 000: 12–19.Google Scholar
Smith, D. S. (1992) “The meanings of family and household: Change and continuity in the mirror of the American census.” Population and Development Review 18: 421–56.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. (1972) “Small families, small households, and residential instability: Town and city in pre-modern Japan,” in Laslett, P. and Wall, R. (eds.) Household and Family in Past Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 429–71.Google Scholar
Soumucho toukei kyoku (SB) (1950) Showa nijuu-go nen kokusei chousa houkoku dai hachi hen: Saishuu houkokusho. Tokyo: Statistics Bureau, Management and Coordination Agency, Office of the Prime Minister, Japan.Google Scholar
Soumucho toukei kyoku (SB) (1960) Nihon no jinko: Showa yon-juu nen kokusei chousa no kaiseitsu. Tokyo: Statistics Bureau, Management and Coordination Agency, Office of the Prime Minister, Japan.Google Scholar
Soumucho toukei kyoku (SB) (1970) Nihon no jinko: Showa yon-juu-go nen kokusei chousa no kaiseitsu. Tokyo: Statistics Bureau, Management and Coordination Agency, Office of the Prime Minister, Japan.Google Scholar
Soumucho toukei kyoku (SB) (1975) Showa go-juu nen kokusei chousa: Zenkoku sokuhou shuukei kekka: 1% chuushutsu shuukei kekka. Tokyo: Statistics Bureau, Management and Coordination Agency, Office of the Prime Minister, Japan.Google Scholar
Soumucho toukei kyoku (SB) (1985) Showa roku-juu nen kokusei chousa houkoku: Dai san kan, dai niji kihonn shuukei kekka. Tokyo: Statistics Bureau, Management and Coordination Agency, Office of the Prime Minister, Japan.Google Scholar
Soumucho toukei kyoku (SB) (1990) Heisei ni nen kokuseichousa houkoku: Dai ni kan, daiichiji kihon shuukei kekka. Tokyo: Statistics Bureau, Management and Coordination Agency, Office of the Prime Minister, Japan.Google Scholar
Soumucho toukei kyoku (SB) (1995) Heisei nana nen kokusei chousa: Chuushutsu sokuhou shukei kekka. Tokyo: Statistics Bureau, Management and Coordination Agency, Office of the Prime Minister, Japan.Google Scholar
Soumucho toukei kyoku (SB) (2000) Heisei juuni nen kokusei chousa houkoku. Tokyo: Statistics Bureau, Management and Coordination Agency, Office of the Prime Minister, Japan.Google Scholar
Soumucho toukei kyoku (SB) (2001) Special Report on Households from the 2000 Census. Tokyo: Statistics Bureau, Management and Coordination Agency, Office of the Prime Minister, Japan.Google Scholar
Starr, P. (1987) “The sociology of official statistics,” in Alonso, W. and Starr, P. (eds.) The Politics of Numbers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation: 7–58.Google Scholar
Stoler, A. (1995) “‘Mixed-bloods’ and the cultural politics of European identity in South-east Asia,” in Pieterse, J. N. and Parekh, B. (eds.) The Decolonization of Imagination: Culture, Knowledge, and Power. London: Zed: 128–48.Google Scholar
Swidler, A., and Arditi, J. (1994) “Identity, boundaries, and differences in the new sociology of knowledge.” Annual Review of Sociology 20: 305–29.Google Scholar
Takahashi, M. (1997) The Emergence of Welfare Society in Japan. Aldershot, U.K.: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (1975) The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tooze, J. A. (2001) Statistics and the German State, 1900-1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tsuya, N., and Kurosu, S. (2000) “Mortality responses to short-term economic stress and household context in early modern Japan: Evidence from two north-eastern villages,” in Bengtsson, T. and Saito, O. (eds.) Population and Economy: From Hunger to Modern Economic Growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 421–55.Google Scholar
Ueno, C. (1994) “Women and the family in transition in postindustrial Japan,” in Gelb, J. and Palley, M. L. (eds.) Women of Japan and Korea. Philadelphia: Temple University Press: 23–42.Google Scholar
Ventresca, M. J. (1995) “When states count: Institutional and political dynamics in modern census establishment, 1800-1993.” PhD diss., Stanford University.Google Scholar
Vogel, E. F. (1967) “Kinship structure, migration to the city, and modernization,” in Dore, R. P. (ed.) Aspects of Social Change in Modern Japan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press: 91–111.Google Scholar
Weber, M., ed. (1978 [1951]) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Woolf, S. (1989) “Statistics and the modern state.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 31: 588–604.Google Scholar
Yabu’uchi, T. (1995) Nihon toukei hattatsushi kenkyuu. Tokyo: Houritsu Bunka Sha.Google Scholar
Yoshizumi, K. (1995) “Marriage and family: Past and present,” in Fujimura-Fanselow, K. and Kameda, A. (eds.) Japanese Women: New Feminist Perspectives on the Past, Present, and Future. New York: City University of New York Press: 183–98.Google Scholar
Young, L. (1999) Japan’s Total Empire: Manchuria and the Culture of Wartime Imperialism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Yusawa, Y. (1925) Showa go nen kokusei chousa houkoku dai ichi hen. Tokyo: Nihon Tokei Kenkyukai.Google Scholar
Yusawa, Y. (1930) Showa go nen kokusei chousa houkoku dai ichi hen. Tokyo: Nihon Tokei Kenkyukai.Google Scholar
Yusawa, Y. (1940) Kokusei chosa kijutsu hen. Tokyo: Nihon Tokei Kenkyukai.Google Scholar
Zureik, E. (2001) “Constructing Palestine through surveillance practices.” British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 28: 205–27.Google Scholar