Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T00:07:28.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The nutritive value of fodder cellulose from wheat straw. I. Its digestibility and feeding value when fed to ruminants and pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. E. Woodman
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge
R. E. Evans
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge

Extract

In this paper are presented the results of an investigation into the composition and digestibility of fodder cellulose. This product was manufactured from wheat straw by the method employed in the making of paper. Wheat straw was boiled with 5·9% caustic soda solution for 7 hr. under a pressure of 70 lb./sq.in. The alkaline liquor was then run off, and the residual cellulose, after being washed with water until free from alkali, was pressed, dried in electric ovens at 100° C. and finally obtained in the form of a coarse meal. It contained, on the basis of dry matter, 79·82% of crude fibre, 16·22% of N-free extractives (mainly xylan), 0·36% of crude protein, 0·49% of other extract and 3·11% of ash. Its content of total cellulose (‘true’ cellulose plus associated cellulosan, as defined by Norman & Jenkins, 1933) amounted to 97·4% on the moisture and ash-free basis.

Digestion trials were carried out with both sheep and pigs. The daily ration of the sheep consisted of 800 g. of chaffed meadow hay, 600 g. of fodder cellulose, 100 g. of linseed cake, 60 g. of molasses and 18 g. of a mixture of equal parts of common salt and precipitated tricalcic phosphate. Although the fodder cellulose formed as much as 38% of the total daily food, no difficulty was experienced in securing clean and ready consumption.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Armsby, H. P. (1917). The Nutrition of Farm Animals, p. 616. New York: The Macmillan Co.Google Scholar
Fingerling, G. (1919). Landw. VersSta. 92, 1.Google Scholar
Kellner, O. (1926). The Scientific Feeding of Animals (trans, by Goodwin, W.), p. 314. London: Duckworth & Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
Kellner, O. & Köhler, A. (1900). Landw.VersSta. 53, 1.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. H. (1923). J. Biol. Chem. 58, 873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, H. H. (1943). J. Anim. Sci. 2, 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, A. G. (1933). J. Agric. Sci. 23, 216.Google Scholar
Norman, A. G. & Jenkins, S. H. (1933). Biochem. J. 27, 818.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E., Duckham, A. N. & French, M. H. (1929 a). J. Agric. Sci. 19, 669.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E., Duckham, A. N. & French, M. H. (1929 b). J. Agric. Sci. 19, 656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, H. E. & Evans, R. E. (1939). J. Agric. Sci. 29, 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar