Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:21:41.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rothschilds’ “Delicate and Difficult Task”: Reputation, Political Instability, and the Brazilian Rescue Loans of the 1890s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2015

LEONARDO WELLER
LEONARDO WELLER*
Affiliation:
Leonardo Weller is an assistant professor at the São Paulo School of Economics—FGV in Brazil. He received his PhD from the London School of Economics. Contact information: Rua Itapeva, 474, andar 10, São Paulo, SP 01332-000, Brasil. E-mail: leonardo.weller@fgv.br.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The London House of Rothschild depended on Brazil to maintain its reputation. This became a problem in the 1890s, when the Brazilian government almost defaulted on its sovereign debt after a change of regime had made politics unstable and economic policy unorthodox. This article shows how the relationship between the bank and the state developed to the point that Rothschilds was forced to rescue its client. Exposure enabled Brazil to implement policies designed to defend the regime at the expense of payment capacity without defaulting. The debt crisis ended only after the political situation stabilized toward the close of the century, when the bank pressured the government to tighten economic policy.

Type
Articles
Information
Enterprise & Society , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , June 2015 , pp. 381 - 412
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2015. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Books

Bouças, Valentin F. Finanças do Brasil: dívida externa, 1824–1945. Rio de Janeiro: Ministério da Fazenda, 1955.Google Scholar
Carvalho, José M. A construção da ordem: a elite política imperial. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 1980.Google Scholar
Carvalho, José M. Teatro de sombras: a política imperial. Rio de Janeiro: IUPERG, 1988.Google Scholar
Carvalho, José M. Forças armadas e política no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 2005.Google Scholar
Chapman, Stanley D. The Rise of Merchant Banking. London: Allen & Unwin, 1984.Google Scholar
Costa, Emília V. Da monarquia à república: momentos decisivos. São Paulo: Unesp, 1998.Google Scholar
Dawson, Frank G. The First Latin American Debt Crisis: the City of London and the 1822–25 Loan Bubble. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Niall. The House of Rothschild: the World’s Banker. London: Penguin, 1998.Google Scholar
Flandreau, Marc, and Zumer, Frédéric. The Making of Global Finance 1880–1913. Paris: OECD, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritsch, Winston. External Constraints on Economic Policy in Brazil, 1889–1930. London: Macmillan, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Richard. Britain and the Onset of Modernization in Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Hanley, Anne G. Native Capital: Financial Institutions and Economic Development in São Paulo, Brazil, 1850–1920. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Hirst, Francis W. The Stock Exchange: A Short Study of Investment and Speculation. London: Williams and Norgate, 1911.Google Scholar
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Estatísticas histórica do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 1990.Google Scholar
London House of Rothschild. A Century of Finance: 1804–1904. London: Neely, 1905.Google Scholar
Marichal, C. A Century of Debt Crises in Latin America: From Independence to the Great Depression, 1820–1930. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Needell, Jeffrey D. The Party of Order: The Conservatives, the Senate, and Slavery in the Brazilian Monarchy, 1831–1871. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Peláez, Carlos M., and Suzigan, Wilson. História monetária do Brasil: análise da política, comportamento e instituições monetárias. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA/INPES, 1976.Google Scholar
Queiroz, Suley R. R. Os radicais da república: jacobinismo, ideologia e ação, 1893–1897. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 1986.Google Scholar
Reverbel, Carlos. Maragatos e pica-paus: guerra civil e degola no Rio Grande. Porto Alegre: L&PM, 1985.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Lêda B., Rodrigues, José H., and Seitenfus, Ricardo A.. Uma história diplomática do Brasil, 1531–1945. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 1995.Google Scholar
Schulz, John. O exército na política: origens da intervenção militar, 1850–1894. São Paulo: Edusp, 1994.Google Scholar
Schulz, John. A crise financeira da abolição. São Paulo: USP, 1996.Google Scholar
Tomz, Michael. Reputation and International Cooperation: Sovereign Debt Across Three Centuries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Topik, Steven. C. The Political Economy of the Brazilian State, 1889–1930. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Topik, Steven. C. Comércio e canhoneiras: Brasil e Estados Unidos na era dos impérios (1889–97). São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2009.Google Scholar
Triner, Gail D. Banking and Economic Development: Brazil, 1889–1930. New York: Palgrave, 2000.Google Scholar

Articles and Book Chapters

Abreu, Marcelo P. “Brazil as a Debtor, 1824–1931.” Economic History Review 59, no. 4 (2006): 765–787.Google Scholar
Abreu, Marcelo P. “Os Funding Loans brasileiros.” Pesquisa e Planejamento Econômico 32, no. 3 (2002): 515–540.Google Scholar
Basile, Marcelo O. “O Império Brasileiro: panorama político.” In História geral do Brasil, edited by Linhares, Maria Y., 188–299. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2000.Google Scholar
Bethell, Leslie. “Independence.” In Brazil: Empire and Republic, 1822–1930, edited by Bethell, Leslie, 30–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boot, Arnoud W. A. “Relationship Banking: What Do We Know?” Journal of Financial Intermediation 9, no. 7 (2000): 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, José M. “Brazil 1870–1914—the Force of Tradition.” Journal of Latin American Studies 24, supplement 1 (1992): 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catão, Luís A. V. “A New Wholesale Price Index for Brazil During the Period 1870–1913.” Revista Brasileira de Economia 46, no. 4 (1992): 519–533.Google Scholar
della Paolera, Gerardo, and Taylor, Alan M.. “Sovereign Debt in Latin America, 1820–1913.” Revista de Historia Económica 31, no. 2 (2013): 173–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esteves, Rui P. “Quis custodiet quem? Sovereign Debt and Bondholders’ Protection Before 1914.” University of Oxford Economics Series Working Paper 323, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fausto, Boris. “O sistema oligárquico nos primeiros anos da República.” In História geral da civilização brasileira: estrutura de poder e economia, 1889–1930, edited by Fausto, Boris, 17–57. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil, 2007.Google Scholar
Fishlow, Albert. “Latin American Nineteenth Century Public Debt: Theory and Practice.” In La deuda pública en América Latina en perspectiva histórica, edited by Liehr, Reinhard, 22–44. Madrid: Iberoamericana, 1995.Google Scholar
Flandreau, Marc. “Collective Action Clauses Before They Had Airplanes: Bondholder Committees and London Stock Exchange in the 19th Century (1827–1868).” Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies Working Paper 1, 2013.Google Scholar
Flandreau, Marc, and Flores, Juan H.. “Bonds and Brands: Foundations of Sovereign Debt Markets, 1820–1830,” Journal of Economic History 69, no. 3 (2009): 646–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flandreau, Marc, and Flores, Juan H.. “Hamlet Without the Prince of Denmark: Relationship Banking and Conditionality Lending in the London Market for Foreign Government Debt, 1815–1913.” Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies Working Paper 8, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flandreau, Marc, and Flores, Juan H.. “Bondholders vs. Bondsellers? Investment Banks and Conditionality Lending in the London Market for Foreign Government Debt, 1815–1913.” European Review of Economic History 16, no. 2 (2012): 356–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flandreau, Marc, and Flores, Juan H.. “The Peaceful Conspiracy: Bond Markets and International Relations During the Pax Britannica.” International Organization 66 (2012): 211–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franco, Gustavo H. “A primeira década republicana.” In A ordem do progresso: cem anos de política econômica republicana, edited by Abreu, Marcelo P., 11–30. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 1990.Google Scholar
Levy, Maria B. “O Encilhamento.” In Economia brasileira: uma visão histórica, edited by Neuhaus, Paulo, 192–226. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 1980.Google Scholar
Levy, Maria B. “The Brazilian Public Debt—Domestic and Foreign, 1824–1913.” In La deuda pública en América Latina en perspectiva histórica, edited by Liehr, Reinhard, 201–228. Madrid: Iberoamericana, 1995.Google Scholar
Love, Joseph L. “Autonomia e interdependência: São Paulo e a Federação Brasileira, 1889–1937.” In História geral da civilização brasileira: estrutura de poder e economia, 1889–1930, edited by Fausto, Boris, 58–83. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil, 1997.Google Scholar
Meade, Teresa. “‘Living Worse and Costing More’: Resistance and Riot in Rio de Janeiro, 1890–1917.” Journal of Latin American Studies 21, no. 2 (May 1989): 241–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchener, Kris J., and Weidenmier, Marc D.. “The Baring Crisis and the Great Latin American Meltdown of the 1890s.” Journal of Economic History 68, no. 2 (2008): 462–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteiro, Hamilton M. “Da independência à vitória da ordem.” In História geral do Brasil, edited by Linhares, Maria Y., 129–143. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2000.Google Scholar
Özler, Sule, and Tabellini, Guido E.. “External Debt and Political Instability.” NBER Working Paper 3772, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Caroline S. “Rothschilds and Brazil: An Introduction to Sources in the Rothschilds Archive.” Latin American Research Review 40, no. 1 (2005): 165–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summerhill, Willian R. “Credible Commitment and Sovereign Default Risk: Two Bond Markets and Imperial Brazil.” In Political Institutions and Financial Development, edited by Haber, Stephen, North, Douglas C., and Weingast, Barry R., 226–258. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Topik, Steven C. “Coffee.” In The Second Conquest of Latin America: Coffee, Henequen, and Oil During the Export Boom, 1850–1930, edited by Topik, Steven C. and Wells, Allen, 37–84. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Magazines, Newspapers, Reports

Annual Report of the Council of the Corporation of Foreign Bondholders, Council of the Corporation of Foreign Bondholders, various volumes.Google Scholar
Economist , issues 2711, 2852, 2860.Google Scholar
Investor’s Monthly Manual , vols. 19–36.Google Scholar
Investor’s Review , vol. 18.Google Scholar
Herapath’s Railway , vol. 59.Google Scholar
Times , issue 35544.Google Scholar

Online Sources

The series on the return on the British sovereign debt from the Investor’s Monthly Manual is available at https://www.globalfinancialdata.com.Google Scholar

Archival Sources

AHP Archive Historique Paribas, Paris.Google Scholar
AHP 11/DFOM, Brésil; Emprunt d’état.Google Scholar
BHMF Biblioteca Histórica da Fazenda do Brasil, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
BHMF 333/181, Balanço da Receita e Despesa da República.Google Scholar
BHMF 332/532, Funding Loan, Acordo do Brasil Realizado pelo Governo Dr. Prudente de Moraes em 15 de Junho de 1898.Google Scholar
BHMF 332/225, Contractos de Empréstimos em Libras Esterlinas do Governo Federal.Google Scholar
IHGB Instituto Histórico e Geográfico Brasileiro, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
IHGB ACP66, Correspondências do Presidente Prudente de Morais.Google Scholar
RA Rothschild Archive, London.Google Scholar
RA XI, Brazilian Collection.Google Scholar
RA I, Ledger Balance.Google Scholar