Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T01:27:10.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Whose risk counts?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2014

Raj Thamotheram
Affiliation:
Network for Sustainable Financial Markets
Aidan Ward
Affiliation:
Organizational Systems Consultant
James P. Hawley
Affiliation:
St Mary's College, California
Andreas G. F. Hoepner
Affiliation:
ICMA Centre, Henley Business School, University of Reading
Keith L. Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Joakim Sandberg
Affiliation:
University of Gothenburg
Edward J. Waitzer
Affiliation:
York University, Toronto
Get access

Summary

In the expectations market the goal is to make a trade in which you have the upper hand, no matter what the impact is on the other party.

Roger Martin (2011: 32)

Of all imaginary organisms – dragons, gods, sea monsters … – economic man is the dullest.

Gregory Bateson (1987: 175)

This makes investors focus on returns without paying sufficient regard to the risks that are being taken to achieve these returns. Rarely do funds make their principal focus risk-adjusted return.

(Towers Watson 2012: 13)

Introduction

The title of this chapter points to a deep unease the authors have about the workings of the investment industry. In an industry where the size of one’s “risk appetite” is a marker of one’s virility, where the biggest brains are drawn to interpreting the subtleties of the movements of markets, the dominant belief is that it is right that outsized financial rewards should go to those who deliver alpha (and clients). Our hypothesis is that, in this context, some simple and common sense truths about risk are ignored.

Here are some generalizations about the investment industry. In an industry where herd behavior is prevalent, the exceptions validate these norms.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andonov, A., Bauer, R. and Cremers, M.. 2012. “Pension Fund Asset Allocation and Liability Discount Rates: Camouflage and Reckless Risk Taking by US Public Plans?” .
Bateson, G. and Bateson, M. C.. 1987. Angels Fear. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Brock, W. 2008. “Five Delectable Examples of ‘Stein’s Law’,” InvestorsInsight.com.
Brock, W. 2012. American Gridlock: Why the Right and Left Are Both Wrong. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Carville, J. 1993. “February 25.” Wall Street Journal, February 23: A1.Google Scholar
Chambers, A. 2012. “Is Audit Failing the Global Capital Markets?International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 10: 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedland, C. 2012. Plutocrats: The Rise of the Super-Rich and the Fall of Everyone Else. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
FSA. 2012. “Interest Rate Hedging Products,” FSA Update.
Grantham, J. 2012. “On the Road to Zero Growth,” GMO Quarterly Letter, November.Google Scholar
Haldane, A. and May, R.. 2011. “Systemic Risk in Banking Eco-systems,” Nature 469: 351–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawley, J., Johnson, K. and Waitzer, E.. 2011. “Reclaiming Fiduciary Duty,” Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, Fall.Google Scholar
Hu, J. 2006. “Cap-Weighted Portfolios Are Sub-optimal Portfolios,” Journal of Investment Management 4 (3): 1–10.Google Scholar
Jolly, D. 2013. “No Decision on Bee-Harming Pesticides in Europe,” New York Times, March 15.Google Scholar
Kay, J. 2012. “Finance Needs Stewards, Not Toll Collectors,” Financial Times, July 22.Google Scholar
Lietaer, B., Ulanowicz, R., Goerner, S. and McLaren, N.. 2010. “Is Our Monetary Structure a Systemic Cause? Evidence and Remedies from Nature,” Journal of Futures Studies, April.Google Scholar
Lo, A. 2012. “Reading about the Financial Crisis: A Twenty-One-Book Review,” Journal of Economic Literature 50 (1): 151–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R. 2011. Fixing the Game. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
Maxim, L. and van der Sluijs, J.. 2013. “Seed-dressing Insecticides and Honey Bees,” Late Lessons from Early Warnings: Science, Precaution, Innovation, European Environment Agency, January.
Meadows, D. 1999. Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System. Hartland, VT: The Sustainability Institute.Google Scholar
Neville, S. 2012. “Hero or Pariah? A Whistle-blower’s Dilemma,” Guardian, November 22.Google Scholar
Niesen, M. 2012. “Clay Christensen: Our Obsession With Efficiency Is Killing Innovation,” Business Insider, December 12.Google Scholar
Palter, R. N., Rehm, W. and Shih, J.. 2008. “Communicating with the Right Investors,McKinsey & Co. 27.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. 2012. What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Shefrin, H. and Cervellati, E.. 2011. “BP’s Failure to Debias: Underscoring the Importance of Behavioral Corporate Finance”, SCU Leavey School of Business Research Paper No. 11–05, March. \l “%23.
Shiller, R. J. 2012. Finance and the Good Society. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Soros, G. 2009. “Soros: General Theory of Reflexivity,” Financial Times, October 26.Google Scholar
Stout, L. 2012. The Shareholder Value Myth. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
Tapestry Network. 2007. “Four Lessons for Audit Committees from High-profile Accounting Scandals,” Tapestry Network, April 6.Google Scholar
Thamotheram, R. and Le Floc’h, M.. 2011. “The BP Crisis as a ‘Preventable Surprise’: Lessons for Institutional Investors,” Rotman International Journal of Pension Management 5 (1): 68–76.Google Scholar
Treanor, J. 2013a. “Standard Chartered Refuses To Claw Back Bonuses After American Fines,” Guardian, March 28.Google Scholar
Treanor, J. 2013b. “Standard Life Pays Executives £12 Million,” Guardian, April 2.Google Scholar
Towers Watson. 2012. “Risk Management Revisited: The Wrong Type of Snow.” .
Tverberg, G. 2013. “Our Investment Sinkhole Problem,” Our Finite World. .

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×