Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-25T01:42:18.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mutua and Others v. Foreign and Commonwealth Office

United States of America.  21 July 2011 ; 05 October 2012 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

State succession — Colonies — Independence — Kenya — Kenya becoming independent in December 1963 — Creation of new independent State — Responsibility of United Kingdom Government — Rules of constitutional theory — Succession in respect of tortious liabilities of Colonial Government — Whether United Kingdom Government or independent Kenya succeeding to liability — Claims for torture of detainees during the colonial period

Relationship of international law and municipal law — Customary international law — Principles on State succession — State practice — Customary international law source of English common law — Doctrine of incorporation — International law rules incorporated automatically if not conflicting with United Kingdom statute — Kenya Independence Act 1963 — Liabilities of Colonial Government — Whether transferring to United Kingdom Government by common law upon Kenya’s independence — Domestic English law of limitation — Limitation Act 1980 — Section 33 considerations — European Convention on Human Rights obligations — Public international law principles — Relevance — Justice of case against accepted international legal norms

Human rights — Prohibition of torture — English law regarding torture with revulsion — Refusal to admit evidence obtained by torture — United Kingdom Government having means to prevent torture — Claimants alleging negligence in failing to prevent torture — Whether issue triable — Limitation Act 1980 — Considerations under Section 33 — Duty of State under Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 to investigate allegations of torture — Public international law with regard to torture — Relevance under Limitation Act 1980

Human rights — Fair trial — Whether possible after delay — Section 33 of Limitation Act 1980 — Discretionary exclusion of time limit for actions in respect of personal injuries or death — Whether claimants persuading Court to exercise its discretion — Considerations under Section 33 — Retrospective application of Convention obligations — Duty of State under Article 3 of European Convention to investigate allegations of torture — Public international law with regard to torture — Relevance — The law of England

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)