Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T16:56:33.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2010

Richard Johnston
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Michael G. Hagen
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Kathleen Hall Jamieson
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achen, Christopher H. 1992. “Social Psychology, Demographic Variables, and Linear Regression: Breaking the Iron Triangle in Voting Research.” Political Behaviour 14: 195–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H. 1983. “A Downsian Spatial Model with Party Activism.” American Political Science Review 77: 974–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allsop, Dee, and Weisberg, Herbert. 1988. “Measuring Change in Party Identification in an Election Campaign.” American Journal of Political Science 32: 996–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Iyengar, Shanto, Simon, Adam, and Valentino, Nicholas. 1994. “Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate?American Political Science Review 88: 829–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Iyengar, Shanto. 1994. “Riding the Wave and Claiming Ownership over Issues: The Joint Effects of Advertising and News Coverage in Campaigns.” Public Opinion Quarterly 58: 335–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Shanto Iyengar. 1995. Going Negative: How Political Advertising Shrinks and Polarizes the Electorate. New York: Free Press
Ansolabehere, Stephen D., Iyengar, Shanto, and Simon, Adam. 1999. “Replicating Experiments Using Aggregate and Survey Data: The Case of Negative Advertising and Turnout.” American Political Science Review 93: 901–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1985. “Resource Allocation in a Presidential Campaign.” Journal of Politics 47: 928–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1996. “Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science, 40: 194–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1997. “How Campaigns Matter.” Princeton University: unpublished manuscript
Bartels, Larry M. 1998. “Electoral Continuity and Change, 1868–1996.” Electoral Studies 17: 301–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2000. “Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952–1996.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 35–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2002. “The Impact of Candidate Traits in American Presidential Elections,” in Anthony King, ed., Leaders' Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Bartels, Larry M., and Zaller, John. “Presidential Vote Models: A Recount.” 2001. PS: Political Science and Politics 34: 9–20Google Scholar
Bean, Clive, and Mughan, Anthony. 1989. “Leadership Effects in Parliamentary Elections in Australia and Britain.” American Political Science Review 83: 1165–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berelson Bernard R., Paul F. Lazarsfeld, and William N. McPhee. 1954. Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Biocca, Frank, ed. 1991. Television and Political Advertising, Volume 1: Psychological Processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Brady, Henry E., and Sniderman, Paul M.. 1985. “Attitude Attribution: A Group Basis for Political Reasoning.” American Political Science Review 79: 1061–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brams, Steven J., and Morton, D. Davis. 1974. “The 3/2's Rule in Presidential Campaigning.” American Political Science Review 68: 113–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, Richard A. 1991. Assessing the President: The Media, Elite Opinion, and Public Support. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
Brody, Richard A., and Page, Benjamin I.. 1972. “Comment: The Assessment of Policy Voting.” American Political Science Review 66: 450–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, Richard A., and Rothenberg, Lawrence S.. 1988. “The Instability of Partisanship: An Analysis of the 1980 Presidential Election.” British Journal of Political Science 18: 445–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley
Campbell, James E. 2000. The American Campaign: U.S. Presidential Campaigns and the National Vote. College Station: Texas A&M University Press
Campbell, James E.. 2001. “The Referendum that Didn't Happen: The Forecasts of the 2000 Presidential Election.” PS: Political Science and Politics 34: 33–4Google Scholar
Chaffee, Steven H. 1975. “Asking New Questions about Communication and Politics,” in Steven H. Chaffee, ed., Political Communication. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage (Sage Annual Reviews of Communication Research, Volume 4): 13–20
Colantoni, Claude S., Levesque, Terrence J., and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1975. “Campaign Resource Allocations Under the Electoral College.” American Political Science Review 69: 141–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, Pamela J. and Feldman, Stanley. 1989. “Candidate Perceptions in an Ambiguous World: Campaigns, Cues, and Inference Processes.” American Journal of Political Science 33: 917–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1962. “Information Flow and the Stability of Partisan Attitudes.” Public Opinion Quarterly 26: 587–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. David E. Apter. New York: Free Press
DiPalma, Giuseppe, and McClosky, Herbert. 1970. “Personality and Con-formity: The Learning of Political Attitudes.” American Political Science Review 64: 1054–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row
Erbring, Lutz, Goldenberg, Edie, and Miller, Arthur. 1980. “Front-Page News and Real-World Cues: A New Look at Agenda-Setting by the Media.” American Journal of Political Science 24: 16–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festinger, Leon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
Finkel, Steven E. 1993. “Reexamining the ‘Minimal Effects’ Model in Recent Presidential Elections.” Journal of Politics 55: 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, Steven E., and Geer, John G.. 1998. “A Spot Check: Casting Doubt on the Demobilizing Effect of Attack Advertising.” American Journal of Political Science 42: 573–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris, Abrams, Samuel, and Pope, Jeremy. 2003. “The 2000 U.S. Presidential Election: Can Retrospective Voting Be Saved?British Journal of Political Science 33: 163–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, Paul, and Goldstein, Ken. 1999. “Measuring Media Exposure and the Effects of Negative Campaign Ads.” American Journal of Political Science 43: 1189–1208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, Funkhouser. 1973. “The Issues of the Sixties: An Exploratory Study of the Dynamics of Public Opinion.” Public Opinion Quarterly 37: 62–75Google Scholar
Gamson, William A. 1992. Talking Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Gelman, Andrew, and King, Gary. 1993. “Why are American Presidential Election Polls so Variable When Votes are so Predictable?British Journal of Political Science 23: 409–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, John. 1998. Party Ideologies in America, 1828–1996. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Graber, Doris A. 1988. Processing the News: How People Tame the Information Tide. New York: Longman. Second Edition
Green, Donald Philip, and Palmquist, Bradley. 1990. “Of Artifacts and Partisan Instability.” American Journal of Political Science 34: 872–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, Michael G., Richard Johnston, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 2001. “Partisan Stability in the 2000 Presidential Campaign: Evidence from the Annenberg Survey.” Presented at the Conference on Parties & Partisanship, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, October 25–27
Hagen, Michael G., Richard Johnston, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 2002. “Effects of the 2000 Presidential Campaign.” Prepared for presentation at the American Political Science Association 2002 Annual Meeting Boston, MA.
Hartz, Louis. 1955. The Liberal Tradition in America. New York: Harcourt, Brace
Hetherington, Marc J. 1996. “The Media's Role in Forming Voters' National Economic Evaluations in 1992.” American Journal of Political Science 40: 372–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbrook, Thomas M. 1996. Do Campaigns Matter? Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage
Holbrook, Thomas M.. 2001. “Forecasting with Mixed Economic Signals: A Cautionary Tale.” PS: Political Science and Politics 34: 39–44Google Scholar
Hovland, Carl I., and Irving L. Janis, eds. 1959. Personality and Persuasibility. New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press
Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Iyengar, Shanto, and Donald R. Kinder. News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 1992. Dirty Politics. New York: Oxford University Press
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 1996. Packaging the Presidency: A History and Criticism of Presidential Campaign Advertising. New York: Oxford University Press
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, and Paul Waldman, eds. 2001. Electing the President, 2000: The Insiders' View. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press
Johnson-Cartee, Karen S., and Gary A. Copeland. 1991. Negative Political Advertising: Coming of Age. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Johnston, Richard. 2002. “Prime Ministerial Contenders in Canada.” In Anthony King, ed., Leaders' Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Johnston, Richard, André Blais, Henry E. Brady, and Jean Crête. 1992. Letting the People Decide: Dynamics of a Canadian Election. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
Johnston, Richard, and Brady, Henry E.. 2001. “The Rolling Cross-Section Design.” Electoral Studies 21: 283–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Richard, Michael G. Hagen, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 2003. “Priming and Persuasion in the 2000 Presidential Campaign.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 3–5, 2003
Just, Marion R., Ann N. Crigler, Dean E. Alger, Timothy E. Cook, Montague Kern, and Darrell M. West. 1996. Crosstalk: Citizens, Candidates, and the Media in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Kahn, Kim Fridkin, and Kenney, Patrick J.. 1999. “Do Negative Campaigns Mobilize or Suppress Turnout? Clarifying the Relationship between Negativity and Participation.” American Political Science Review 93: 877–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Elihu, and Paul F. Lazarsfeld. 1955. Personal Influence. New York: Free Press
Keith, Bruce E., David B. Magleby, Candice J. Nelson, Elizabeth Orr, Mark C. Westlye, and Raymond E. Wolfinger. 1992. The Myth of the Independent Voter. Berkeley: University of California Press
Kern, Montague. 1989. 30-Second Politics: Political Advertising in the Eighties. New York: Praeger
Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1983. Macroeconomics and Micropolitics: The Electoral Effects of Economic Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Kinder, Donald R. 1986. “Presidential Character Revisited,” in Richard R. Lau and David O. Sears, eds. Political Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. (The 19th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition)
Kinder, Donald R., Robert P. Abelson, and Susan T. Fiske. 1979. Developmental Research on Candidate Instrumentation. Ann Arbor: National Election Study Pilot Study Report
King, Anthony, ed. 2002. Leaders' Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Kitschelt, Herbert 1996. The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Klapper, Joseph T. 1960. The Effects of Mass Communication. Glencoe, IL: Free Press
Kramer, Gerald H. 1971. “Short-term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior,” American Political Science Review 65: 131–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornhauser, William. 1959. The Politics of Mass Society. New York: Free Press
Laakso, Markku, and Taagepera, Rein. 1979. “‘Effective’ Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12: 3–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Lau Richard R., Sigelman, Lee, Heldman, Caroline, and Babbitt, Paul. 1999. “The Effects of Negative Political Advertisements: A Meta-Analytic Assessment.” American Political Science Review 93: 851–75Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Rice, Tom W.. 1983. “Localism in Presidential Elections: The Home State Advantage.” American Journal of Political Science 27: 548–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Tien, Charles. 2001. “Modeling the Future: Les-sons from the Gore Forecast.” PS: Political Science and Politics 34: 21–3Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M. and Stein Rokkan, 1967. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments. Introduction,” in S. M. Lipset and S. Rokkan, eds., Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press, pp. 1–64
Lockhart, Julia K. 2002. “Media References to the Gender Gap during September and October 2000.” Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia, unpublished memorandum
Lodge, Milton, McGraw, Kathleen M., and Stroh, Patrick. 1989. “An Impres-sion-Driven Model of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review 83: 399–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, Steenbergen, Marco R., and Brau, Shawn. 1995. “The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review 89: 309–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCombs, Maxwell, and Shaw, Donald. 1972. “The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media.” Public Opinion Quarterly 36: 176–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, William J. 1968. “Personality and Susceptibility to Social Influence.” In Edgar F. Borgatta and William W. Lambert, eds., The Handbook of Personality Theory and Research. Chicago: Rand McNally
McGuire, William J. 1969. “The Nature of Attitudes and Attitude Change.” In Gardner Lindzey and Elliot Aronson, eds. The Handbook of Social Psychology, 2nd edition, Vol. 3. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley
McLeod, Jack, Becker, Lee, and Byrnes, James. 1974. “Another Look at the Agenda-Setting Function of the Press.” Communication Research 1: 131–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren E., and J. Merrill Shanks. 1996. The New American Voter. Cagmbridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Mutz, Diana C. 1998. Impersonal Influence: How Perceptions of Mass Collectives Affect Political Attitudes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Mutz, Diana C., and Martin, Paul S.. 2001. “Facilitating Communication across Lines of Political Difference.” American Political Science Review 95: 97–114Google Scholar
Helmut, Norpoth,. 2001. “Primary Colors: A Mixed Blessing for Al Gore.” PS: Political Science and Politics 34: 45–8Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., Shapiro, Robert Y., and Dempsey, Glenn R.. 1987. “What Moves Public Opinion?American Political Science Review 81: 23–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palfrey, Thomas R. 1984. “Spatial Equilibrium with Entry.” Review of Economic Studies 51: 139–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Thomas, and Robert McClure. 1976. The Unseeing Eye. New York: Putnam
Peffley, Mark A., and Hurwitz, John. 1985. “A Hierarchical Model of Attitude Constraint.” American Journal of Political Science. 29: 871–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Vincent, and John Zaller. 1990. “Evaluation of Media Exposure Items in the 1989 NES Pilot Study.” Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, National Election Study Board of Overseers, technical report
Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster
Rabinowitz, George, and Macdonald, Stuart E.. 1989. “A Directional Theory of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 83: 93–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahn, Wendy M. 1993. “The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37: 472–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahn, Wendy M., John H. Aldrich, Eugene Borgida, and John L. Sullivan. 1990. “A Social-Cognitive Model of Candidate Appraisal.” In James Kuklinski and John Ferejohn, eds., Information and Democratic Processes. Urbana: University of Illinois Press
Romer, Daniel, Kathleen Hall Jamieson, and Joseph Cappella. 2000. “Does Attack Advertising Create a Backlash? Mobilize the Other Side? Depress or Increase Support by Those of the Same Party?” in Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Everything You Think You Know About Politics … And Why You're Wrong. New York: Basic Books
Romer, Daniel, Kate Kenski, Paul Waldman, Christopher Adasiewicz, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 2004. Capturing Campaign Dynamics: The National Annenberg Election Survey. New York: Oxford University Press
Rosenstone, Steven J. 1983. Forecasting Presidential Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Shafer, Byron E., and William J. M. Claggett. 1995. The Two Majorities: The Issue Context of Modern American Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press
Shaw, Daron R. 1999a. “A Study of Presidential Campaign Effects from 1952 to 1992.” Journal of Politics 61: 387–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Daron R. 1999b. “The Effect of TV Ads and Candidate Appearances on Statewide Presidential Votes, 1988–96.” American Political Science Review 93: 345–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Daron R. 1999c. “The Methods behind the Madness: Presidential Electoral College Strategies, 1988–1996.” Journal of Politics 61: 893–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Adam F. 2002. The Winning Message: Candidate Behavior, Campaign Discourse, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Sniderman, Paul M. 1975. Personality and Democratic Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
Sniderman, Paul M., Richard A. Brody, and Philip E. Tetlock. 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Tuffe, Edward R. 1980. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Waldman, Paul, and Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 2003. “Rhetorical Convergence and Issue Knowledge in the 2000 Presidential Election.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 33: 145–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wattenberg, Martin P., and Leonard Brians, Craig. 1999. “Negative Campaign Advertising: Demobilizer or Mobilizer?American Political Science Review 93: 891–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, David. 1981. Media Agenda-Setting in a Presidential Election. New York: Praeger
Weisberg, Herbert, ed. 1995. Democracy's Feast: Elections in America. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House
Weisberg, Herbert, and David C. Kimball. 1995. “Attitudinal Correlates of the 1992 Presidential Vote: Party Identification and Beyond.” In Weisberg (1995), pp. 72–111
West, Darrell M. 1997. Air Wars: Television Advertising in Election Campaigns 1952–1996. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc. Second Edition
Wlezien, Christopher. 2001. “On Forecasting the Presidential Vote.” PS: Political Science and Politics 34: 25–31Google Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher, and Erikson, Robert S.. 2002. “The Timeline of Presidential Election Campaigns.” Journal of Politics 64: 969–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John. 1990. “Bringing Converse Back In: Modeling Information Flow in Political Campaigns.” In Political Analysis. 1: 181–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John. 1991. “Information, Values, and Opinion.” American Political Science Review 85: 1215–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Zaller, John. 1998. “Monica Lewinsky's Contribution to Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 31: 182–9Google Scholar
Achen, Christopher H. 1992. “Social Psychology, Demographic Variables, and Linear Regression: Breaking the Iron Triangle in Voting Research.” Political Behaviour 14: 195–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H. 1983. “A Downsian Spatial Model with Party Activism.” American Political Science Review 77: 974–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allsop, Dee, and Weisberg, Herbert. 1988. “Measuring Change in Party Identification in an Election Campaign.” American Journal of Political Science 32: 996–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Iyengar, Shanto, Simon, Adam, and Valentino, Nicholas. 1994. “Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate?American Political Science Review 88: 829–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Iyengar, Shanto. 1994. “Riding the Wave and Claiming Ownership over Issues: The Joint Effects of Advertising and News Coverage in Campaigns.” Public Opinion Quarterly 58: 335–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Shanto Iyengar. 1995. Going Negative: How Political Advertising Shrinks and Polarizes the Electorate. New York: Free Press
Ansolabehere, Stephen D., Iyengar, Shanto, and Simon, Adam. 1999. “Replicating Experiments Using Aggregate and Survey Data: The Case of Negative Advertising and Turnout.” American Political Science Review 93: 901–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1985. “Resource Allocation in a Presidential Campaign.” Journal of Politics 47: 928–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1996. “Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science, 40: 194–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1997. “How Campaigns Matter.” Princeton University: unpublished manuscript
Bartels, Larry M. 1998. “Electoral Continuity and Change, 1868–1996.” Electoral Studies 17: 301–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2000. “Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952–1996.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 35–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2002. “The Impact of Candidate Traits in American Presidential Elections,” in Anthony King, ed., Leaders' Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Bartels, Larry M., and Zaller, John. “Presidential Vote Models: A Recount.” 2001. PS: Political Science and Politics 34: 9–20Google Scholar
Bean, Clive, and Mughan, Anthony. 1989. “Leadership Effects in Parliamentary Elections in Australia and Britain.” American Political Science Review 83: 1165–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berelson Bernard R., Paul F. Lazarsfeld, and William N. McPhee. 1954. Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Biocca, Frank, ed. 1991. Television and Political Advertising, Volume 1: Psychological Processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Brady, Henry E., and Sniderman, Paul M.. 1985. “Attitude Attribution: A Group Basis for Political Reasoning.” American Political Science Review 79: 1061–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brams, Steven J., and Morton, D. Davis. 1974. “The 3/2's Rule in Presidential Campaigning.” American Political Science Review 68: 113–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, Richard A. 1991. Assessing the President: The Media, Elite Opinion, and Public Support. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
Brody, Richard A., and Page, Benjamin I.. 1972. “Comment: The Assessment of Policy Voting.” American Political Science Review 66: 450–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, Richard A., and Rothenberg, Lawrence S.. 1988. “The Instability of Partisanship: An Analysis of the 1980 Presidential Election.” British Journal of Political Science 18: 445–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley
Campbell, James E. 2000. The American Campaign: U.S. Presidential Campaigns and the National Vote. College Station: Texas A&M University Press
Campbell, James E.. 2001. “The Referendum that Didn't Happen: The Forecasts of the 2000 Presidential Election.” PS: Political Science and Politics 34: 33–4Google Scholar
Chaffee, Steven H. 1975. “Asking New Questions about Communication and Politics,” in Steven H. Chaffee, ed., Political Communication. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage (Sage Annual Reviews of Communication Research, Volume 4): 13–20
Colantoni, Claude S., Levesque, Terrence J., and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1975. “Campaign Resource Allocations Under the Electoral College.” American Political Science Review 69: 141–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, Pamela J. and Feldman, Stanley. 1989. “Candidate Perceptions in an Ambiguous World: Campaigns, Cues, and Inference Processes.” American Journal of Political Science 33: 917–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1962. “Information Flow and the Stability of Partisan Attitudes.” Public Opinion Quarterly 26: 587–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. David E. Apter. New York: Free Press
DiPalma, Giuseppe, and McClosky, Herbert. 1970. “Personality and Con-formity: The Learning of Political Attitudes.” American Political Science Review 64: 1054–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row
Erbring, Lutz, Goldenberg, Edie, and Miller, Arthur. 1980. “Front-Page News and Real-World Cues: A New Look at Agenda-Setting by the Media.” American Journal of Political Science 24: 16–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festinger, Leon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
Finkel, Steven E. 1993. “Reexamining the ‘Minimal Effects’ Model in Recent Presidential Elections.” Journal of Politics 55: 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, Steven E., and Geer, John G.. 1998. “A Spot Check: Casting Doubt on the Demobilizing Effect of Attack Advertising.” American Journal of Political Science 42: 573–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris, Abrams, Samuel, and Pope, Jeremy. 2003. “The 2000 U.S. Presidential Election: Can Retrospective Voting Be Saved?British Journal of Political Science 33: 163–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, Paul, and Goldstein, Ken. 1999. “Measuring Media Exposure and the Effects of Negative Campaign Ads.” American Journal of Political Science 43: 1189–1208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, Funkhouser. 1973. “The Issues of the Sixties: An Exploratory Study of the Dynamics of Public Opinion.” Public Opinion Quarterly 37: 62–75Google Scholar
Gamson, William A. 1992. Talking Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Gelman, Andrew, and King, Gary. 1993. “Why are American Presidential Election Polls so Variable When Votes are so Predictable?British Journal of Political Science 23: 409–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, John. 1998. Party Ideologies in America, 1828–1996. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Graber, Doris A. 1988. Processing the News: How People Tame the Information Tide. New York: Longman. Second Edition
Green, Donald Philip, and Palmquist, Bradley. 1990. “Of Artifacts and Partisan Instability.” American Journal of Political Science 34: 872–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, Michael G., Richard Johnston, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 2001. “Partisan Stability in the 2000 Presidential Campaign: Evidence from the Annenberg Survey.” Presented at the Conference on Parties & Partisanship, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, October 25–27
Hagen, Michael G., Richard Johnston, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 2002. “Effects of the 2000 Presidential Campaign.” Prepared for presentation at the American Political Science Association 2002 Annual Meeting Boston, MA.
Hartz, Louis. 1955. The Liberal Tradition in America. New York: Harcourt, Brace
Hetherington, Marc J. 1996. “The Media's Role in Forming Voters' National Economic Evaluations in 1992.” American Journal of Political Science 40: 372–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbrook, Thomas M. 1996. Do Campaigns Matter? Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage
Holbrook, Thomas M.. 2001. “Forecasting with Mixed Economic Signals: A Cautionary Tale.” PS: Political Science and Politics 34: 39–44Google Scholar
Hovland, Carl I., and Irving L. Janis, eds. 1959. Personality and Persuasibility. New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press
Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Iyengar, Shanto, and Donald R. Kinder. News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 1992. Dirty Politics. New York: Oxford University Press
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 1996. Packaging the Presidency: A History and Criticism of Presidential Campaign Advertising. New York: Oxford University Press
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, and Paul Waldman, eds. 2001. Electing the President, 2000: The Insiders' View. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press
Johnson-Cartee, Karen S., and Gary A. Copeland. 1991. Negative Political Advertising: Coming of Age. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Johnston, Richard. 2002. “Prime Ministerial Contenders in Canada.” In Anthony King, ed., Leaders' Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Johnston, Richard, André Blais, Henry E. Brady, and Jean Crête. 1992. Letting the People Decide: Dynamics of a Canadian Election. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
Johnston, Richard, and Brady, Henry E.. 2001. “The Rolling Cross-Section Design.” Electoral Studies 21: 283–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Richard, Michael G. Hagen, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 2003. “Priming and Persuasion in the 2000 Presidential Campaign.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 3–5, 2003
Just, Marion R., Ann N. Crigler, Dean E. Alger, Timothy E. Cook, Montague Kern, and Darrell M. West. 1996. Crosstalk: Citizens, Candidates, and the Media in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Kahn, Kim Fridkin, and Kenney, Patrick J.. 1999. “Do Negative Campaigns Mobilize or Suppress Turnout? Clarifying the Relationship between Negativity and Participation.” American Political Science Review 93: 877–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Elihu, and Paul F. Lazarsfeld. 1955. Personal Influence. New York: Free Press
Keith, Bruce E., David B. Magleby, Candice J. Nelson, Elizabeth Orr, Mark C. Westlye, and Raymond E. Wolfinger. 1992. The Myth of the Independent Voter. Berkeley: University of California Press
Kern, Montague. 1989. 30-Second Politics: Political Advertising in the Eighties. New York: Praeger
Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1983. Macroeconomics and Micropolitics: The Electoral Effects of Economic Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Kinder, Donald R. 1986. “Presidential Character Revisited,” in Richard R. Lau and David O. Sears, eds. Political Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. (The 19th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition)
Kinder, Donald R., Robert P. Abelson, and Susan T. Fiske. 1979. Developmental Research on Candidate Instrumentation. Ann Arbor: National Election Study Pilot Study Report
King, Anthony, ed. 2002. Leaders' Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Kitschelt, Herbert 1996. The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Klapper, Joseph T. 1960. The Effects of Mass Communication. Glencoe, IL: Free Press
Kramer, Gerald H. 1971. “Short-term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior,” American Political Science Review 65: 131–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornhauser, William. 1959. The Politics of Mass Society. New York: Free Press
Laakso, Markku, and Taagepera, Rein. 1979. “‘Effective’ Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12: 3–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Lau Richard R., Sigelman, Lee, Heldman, Caroline, and Babbitt, Paul. 1999. “The Effects of Negative Political Advertisements: A Meta-Analytic Assessment.” American Political Science Review 93: 851–75Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Rice, Tom W.. 1983. “Localism in Presidential Elections: The Home State Advantage.” American Journal of Political Science 27: 548–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Tien, Charles. 2001. “Modeling the Future: Les-sons from the Gore Forecast.” PS: Political Science and Politics 34: 21–3Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M. and Stein Rokkan, 1967. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments. Introduction,” in S. M. Lipset and S. Rokkan, eds., Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press, pp. 1–64
Lockhart, Julia K. 2002. “Media References to the Gender Gap during September and October 2000.” Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia, unpublished memorandum
Lodge, Milton, McGraw, Kathleen M., and Stroh, Patrick. 1989. “An Impres-sion-Driven Model of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review 83: 399–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, Steenbergen, Marco R., and Brau, Shawn. 1995. “The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review 89: 309–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCombs, Maxwell, and Shaw, Donald. 1972. “The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media.” Public Opinion Quarterly 36: 176–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, William J. 1968. “Personality and Susceptibility to Social Influence.” In Edgar F. Borgatta and William W. Lambert, eds., The Handbook of Personality Theory and Research. Chicago: Rand McNally
McGuire, William J. 1969. “The Nature of Attitudes and Attitude Change.” In Gardner Lindzey and Elliot Aronson, eds. The Handbook of Social Psychology, 2nd edition, Vol. 3. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley
McLeod, Jack, Becker, Lee, and Byrnes, James. 1974. “Another Look at the Agenda-Setting Function of the Press.” Communication Research 1: 131–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren E., and J. Merrill Shanks. 1996. The New American Voter. Cagmbridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Mutz, Diana C. 1998. Impersonal Influence: How Perceptions of Mass Collectives Affect Political Attitudes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Mutz, Diana C., and Martin, Paul S.. 2001. “Facilitating Communication across Lines of Political Difference.” American Political Science Review 95: 97–114Google Scholar
Helmut, Norpoth,. 2001. “Primary Colors: A Mixed Blessing for Al Gore.” PS: Political Science and Politics 34: 45–8Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., Shapiro, Robert Y., and Dempsey, Glenn R.. 1987. “What Moves Public Opinion?American Political Science Review 81: 23–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palfrey, Thomas R. 1984. “Spatial Equilibrium with Entry.” Review of Economic Studies 51: 139–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Thomas, and Robert McClure. 1976. The Unseeing Eye. New York: Putnam
Peffley, Mark A., and Hurwitz, John. 1985. “A Hierarchical Model of Attitude Constraint.” American Journal of Political Science. 29: 871–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Vincent, and John Zaller. 1990. “Evaluation of Media Exposure Items in the 1989 NES Pilot Study.” Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, National Election Study Board of Overseers, technical report
Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster
Rabinowitz, George, and Macdonald, Stuart E.. 1989. “A Directional Theory of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 83: 93–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahn, Wendy M. 1993. “The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37: 472–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahn, Wendy M., John H. Aldrich, Eugene Borgida, and John L. Sullivan. 1990. “A Social-Cognitive Model of Candidate Appraisal.” In James Kuklinski and John Ferejohn, eds., Information and Democratic Processes. Urbana: University of Illinois Press
Romer, Daniel, Kathleen Hall Jamieson, and Joseph Cappella. 2000. “Does Attack Advertising Create a Backlash? Mobilize the Other Side? Depress or Increase Support by Those of the Same Party?” in Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Everything You Think You Know About Politics … And Why You're Wrong. New York: Basic Books
Romer, Daniel, Kate Kenski, Paul Waldman, Christopher Adasiewicz, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 2004. Capturing Campaign Dynamics: The National Annenberg Election Survey. New York: Oxford University Press
Rosenstone, Steven J. 1983. Forecasting Presidential Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Shafer, Byron E., and William J. M. Claggett. 1995. The Two Majorities: The Issue Context of Modern American Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press
Shaw, Daron R. 1999a. “A Study of Presidential Campaign Effects from 1952 to 1992.” Journal of Politics 61: 387–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Daron R. 1999b. “The Effect of TV Ads and Candidate Appearances on Statewide Presidential Votes, 1988–96.” American Political Science Review 93: 345–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Daron R. 1999c. “The Methods behind the Madness: Presidential Electoral College Strategies, 1988–1996.” Journal of Politics 61: 893–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Adam F. 2002. The Winning Message: Candidate Behavior, Campaign Discourse, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Sniderman, Paul M. 1975. Personality and Democratic Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
Sniderman, Paul M., Richard A. Brody, and Philip E. Tetlock. 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Tuffe, Edward R. 1980. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Waldman, Paul, and Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 2003. “Rhetorical Convergence and Issue Knowledge in the 2000 Presidential Election.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 33: 145–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wattenberg, Martin P., and Leonard Brians, Craig. 1999. “Negative Campaign Advertising: Demobilizer or Mobilizer?American Political Science Review 93: 891–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, David. 1981. Media Agenda-Setting in a Presidential Election. New York: Praeger
Weisberg, Herbert, ed. 1995. Democracy's Feast: Elections in America. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House
Weisberg, Herbert, and David C. Kimball. 1995. “Attitudinal Correlates of the 1992 Presidential Vote: Party Identification and Beyond.” In Weisberg (1995), pp. 72–111
West, Darrell M. 1997. Air Wars: Television Advertising in Election Campaigns 1952–1996. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc. Second Edition
Wlezien, Christopher. 2001. “On Forecasting the Presidential Vote.” PS: Political Science and Politics 34: 25–31Google Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher, and Erikson, Robert S.. 2002. “The Timeline of Presidential Election Campaigns.” Journal of Politics 64: 969–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John. 1990. “Bringing Converse Back In: Modeling Information Flow in Political Campaigns.” In Political Analysis. 1: 181–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John. 1991. “Information, Values, and Opinion.” American Political Science Review 85: 1215–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Zaller, John. 1998. “Monica Lewinsky's Contribution to Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 31: 182–9Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Richard Johnston, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Michael G. Hagen, Rutgers University, New Jersey, Kathleen Hall Jamieson, University of Pennsylvania
  • Book: The 2000 Presidential Election and the Foundations of Party Politics
  • Online publication: 28 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511756207.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Richard Johnston, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Michael G. Hagen, Rutgers University, New Jersey, Kathleen Hall Jamieson, University of Pennsylvania
  • Book: The 2000 Presidential Election and the Foundations of Party Politics
  • Online publication: 28 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511756207.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Richard Johnston, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Michael G. Hagen, Rutgers University, New Jersey, Kathleen Hall Jamieson, University of Pennsylvania
  • Book: The 2000 Presidential Election and the Foundations of Party Politics
  • Online publication: 28 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511756207.010
Available formats
×