Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures, tables, and boxes
- List of contributors
- Preface
- List of abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Agriculture and the trade negotiations: a synopsis
- Part I Experience and lessons from the implementation of WTO agreements
- Part II Interests, options, and objectives in a new trade round
- Part III New trade rules and quantitative assessments of future liberalization options
- Part IV New trade issues and developing country agriculture
- 15 Sanitary and phytosanitary barriers to agricultural trade: progress, prospects, and implications for developing countries
- 16 How developing countries view the impact of sanitary and phytosanitary measures on agricultural exports
- 17 State trading in agricultural trade: options and prospects for new rules
- 18 Environmental considerations in agricultural negotiations in the new WTO round
- 19 Intellectual property rights and agriculture
- 20 Genetically modified foods, trade, and developing countries
- 21 Multifunctionality and optimal environmental policies for agriculture in an open economy
- Author index
- Subject index
- References
15 - Sanitary and phytosanitary barriers to agricultural trade: progress, prospects, and implications for developing countries
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2010
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures, tables, and boxes
- List of contributors
- Preface
- List of abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Agriculture and the trade negotiations: a synopsis
- Part I Experience and lessons from the implementation of WTO agreements
- Part II Interests, options, and objectives in a new trade round
- Part III New trade rules and quantitative assessments of future liberalization options
- Part IV New trade issues and developing country agriculture
- 15 Sanitary and phytosanitary barriers to agricultural trade: progress, prospects, and implications for developing countries
- 16 How developing countries view the impact of sanitary and phytosanitary measures on agricultural exports
- 17 State trading in agricultural trade: options and prospects for new rules
- 18 Environmental considerations in agricultural negotiations in the new WTO round
- 19 Intellectual property rights and agriculture
- 20 Genetically modified foods, trade, and developing countries
- 21 Multifunctionality and optimal environmental policies for agriculture in an open economy
- Author index
- Subject index
- References
Summary
Introduction
Access for agricultural products into protected domestic markets remains one of the vexing problems of global economic integration. With the conclusion of the 1986–94 Uruguay Round negotiations, a cohesive multilateral framework emerged to discipline the policies that World Trade Organization (WTO) Member Countries use to protect and support their agricultural sectors. The new multilateral framework includes an Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (the SPS Agreement), which provides an international policy regime for trade when there potentially are risks to human, animal, and plant health or life. The hope is that this Agreement will bring SPS regulation affecting international agricultural market access under the governance of multilateral trade rules, with a consequent expansion of trade opportunities.
All nations maintain complex regulatory regimes governing the production, processing, and sales of agricultural commodities and foodstuffs. The SPS Agreement was intended as a bulwark against the widely perceived failure of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) to prevent the misuse of such measures for protectionist purposes. While reaffirming the right of every nation to protect health and life, the SPS Agreement sought to impose commitments that would minimize adverse trade effects. WTO members agreed to maintain transparent procedures regarding the adoption and application of SPS regulations, and to base their policies on assessment of the associated risks.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Agriculture and the New Trade AgendaCreating a Global Trading Environment for Development, pp. 329 - 358Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2004
References
Antle, J., 1995. Choice and Efficiency in Food Safety Policy, Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute Press
Biosecurity Authority, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, 2000. “Revised Quantitative Risk Assessment on Chicken Meat Products from the United States,” New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Auckland, April 7
Fischer, R., 1998. “Regulation as a Trade Issue from Chilean Perspective,” in “Regulatory Reform in the Global Economy: Asian and Latin American Perspectives,” Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Proceedings, Paris
Gascoine, D., 1999. “Harmonization, Mutual Recognition, and Equivalence – How and What is Attainable,” paper presented at the Conference on International Food Trade Beyond 2000: Science-Based Decisions, Harmonization, Equivalence and Mutual Recognition, Melbourne
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade), 1992. “International Trade, 1990–91,” Geneva
and , 1998. “On the Need for More Economic Assessment of Quarantine/Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Policies,” Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1, 525–44Google Scholar
Joint Food and Agriculture Organization (UN)/World Health Organization Food Standard Programme, Codex Committee on General Principles, 1999. “Improvement of Procedures for the Adoption of Codex Standards and Measures to Facilitate Consensus,” Food and Agriculture Organization (UN)/World Health Organization CX/GP/99/5, March, Rome
, 1998. “Agricultural Trade Policy: Completing the Reform,” Policy Analysis in International Economics, 53, 86–8Google Scholar
and , 1996. “Modeling the Costs of Food Safety Regulations,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78(5), 1285–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, G. C., T. Josling, D. Bullock, L. Unnevehr, M. Rosengrant, and L. Hill, 1999. “The Economics and Politics of Genetically Modified Organisms in Agriculture: Implications for World Trade Organization 2000,” University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Agricultural, Consumer, and Environmental Sciences, Bulletin 809, Urbana, Illinois, November
Orden, D. and D. Roberts, 1997. “Determinants of Technical Barriers to Trade: The Case of US Phytosanitary Restrictions on Mexican Avocados, 1972–1995,” in D. Orden and D. Roberts (eds.), Understanding Technical Barriers to Trade, Washington, DC: International Trade Research Consortium
Orden, D., R. Paarlberg, and T. Roe, 1999. Policy Reform in American Agriculture: Analysis and Prognosis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Orden, D. and E. Romano, 1996. “The Avocado Dispute and Other Technical Barriers to Agricultural Trade Under North American Free Trade Agreement,” paper presented at North American Free Trade Agreement and Agriculture: Is the Experiment Working?, San Antonio, Texas, November
Otsuki, T., J. Wilson, and M. Sewadeh, 2000. “Saving Two in a Billion: A Case Study to Quantify the Trade Effects of European Food Safety Standards on African Exports,” paper presented at a Conference on the Economics of Quarantine, Australian Quarantine and Inspection Service, Melbourne, October 24–25
Permanent Mission of India, 1999. “Communication from India: Proposals Regarding the Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures in Terms of Paragraph 9(a)(I) of the Geneva Ministerial Declaration,” WT/GC/W/202, Geneva
Powell, M., 1997. “Science in Sanitary and Phytosanitary Dispute Resolution,” Discussion Paper 97–50 for Resources for the Future, Washington, DC
, 1998. “Preliminary Assessment of the Effects of the World Trade Organization Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Trade Regulations,” Journal of International Economics Law, 1(3), 377–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, D., 2000. “Sanitary and Phytosanitary Risk Management in the Post-Uruguay Round Era: An Economic Perspective,” in Incorporating Science, Economics, and Sociology in Developing Sanitary and Phytosanitary Standards in International Trade, Washington, DC: National Academy Press
Sykes, A. O., 1995. Product Standards for Internationally Integrated Goods Markets, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press
United States Department of Agriculture/Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), 1996. “Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Accomplishments Report,” Washington, DC
United States Department of Agriculture/Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), 1997. “Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Accomplishments Report,” Washington, DC
United States Department of Agriculture/Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), 1998. “Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Accomplishments Report,” Washington, DC
Victor, D., 1999. “Risk Management and the World Trading System: Regulating International Trade Distortions Caused by National Sanitary and Phytosanitary Policies,” paper presented at the National Research Council Conference on Incorporating Science, Economics, Sociology, and Politics in Sanitary and Phytosanitary Standards in International Trade, Irvine, California, January; published National Academy Press, 2000
World Trade Organization (World Trade Organization), 1998a. Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, “Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures – Summary of the Meeting Held on September 15–16, 1998 – Note by the Secretariat,” G/Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures/R/12, Geneva
World Trade Organization (World Trade Organization), 1998b. Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, “Summary of the Meeting Held on September 15–16, 1998,” G/Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures/R/12, Geneva
World Trade Organization (World Trade Organization), 1998c. Report of the Arbitrator, “European Communities Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones) – Arbitration under Article 21.3 (c) of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Dispute – Award of the Arbitrator,” WT/DS26/15 and WT/DS48/13, May, Geneva
World Trade Organization (World Trade Organization), 1999a. Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, “Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures – Specific Trade Concerns – Note by the Secretariat,” G/Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures/GEN/204, Geneva
World Trade Organization (World Trade Organization), 1999b. Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, “Procedure to Monitor the Process of International Harmonization,” G/Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures/13, July, Geneva
World Trade Organization (World Trade Organization), 1999c. Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, “Review of the Operation and Implementation of the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures,” G/Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures/12, Geneva
World Trade Organization (World Trade Organization) 1999d. Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, “Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement and Developing Countries: Statement by Egypt at the Meeting of July 7–8, 1999,” G/Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures/GEN/128, July, Geneva
World Trade Organization (World Trade Organization), 1999e. Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, “Submission by European Communities at the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Council Meeting of July 7–8, 1999, ‘Implementation of the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement-Trade Concerns’,” G/Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures/132, Geneva
World Trade Organization (World Trade Organization), 2000a. Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, “Equivalence: Submission from the United States,” G/Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures/GEN/212, November, Geneva
World Trade Organization (World Trade Organization), 2000b. Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, “Specific Trade Concerns,” G/Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures/GEN/204, September 27
- 2
- Cited by