Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-31T18:53:12.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A THEORY OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WITH ENDOGENOUS FERTILITY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2011

Ceyhun Elgin*
Affiliation:
Bogazici University
*
Address correspondence to: Ceyhun Elgin, Department of Economics, Bogazici University, Natuk Birkan Binasi, Bebek, Istanbul 34342, Turkey; e-mail: ceyhun.elgin@boun.edu.tr.

Abstract

In this paper I build a unified model of economic growth to account for the time-series evolution of output, fertility, and population in the industrialization of an economy. Specifically, I merge the unified growth models of Galor and Weil [American Economic Review 90 (2000), 806–828] and Hansen and Prescott [American Economic Review 92 (2002), 1205–1217] to capture the importance of human capital formation, fertility decline, and the transition from agriculture to industry in transition from stagnation to growth. Moreover, I also incorporate young adult mortality into the model. Initially, the aggregate human capital and return to education are low and the mortality rate is high; therefore parents invest in quantity of children. Once sufficient human capital is accumulated and mortality rates are reduced, thanks to increasing life expectancy, with the activation of the modern human capital–intensive sector, parents start to invest in the quality of their children. The simulation of the model economy improves upon the quantitative performance of the existing literature and successfully captures the evolution of fertility, population, and GDP in the British economy between 1750 and 2000.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arora, S. (2001) Health, human productivity, and long-term economic growth. Journal of Economic History 61, 699749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar, M. and Leukhina, O. (2010) Review of Economic Dynamics 13, 424451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadberry, S., Campbell, B., Klein, A., Overton, M. and Leeuwen, B. van (2010) British Economic Growth, 1270–1870: Some Preliminary Estimates. Working paper, University of Warwick.Google Scholar
Clark, G. (2005) Human capital, fertility and the industrial revolution. Journal of European Economic Association 3, 505515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doepke, M. (2004) Accounting for fertility decline during the transition to growth. Journal of Economic Growth 9, 347383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floud, D. and McCloskey, D. N. (1994)The Economic History of Britain since 1700, vols. 1, 2, and 3. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Galor, O. (2005) From stagnation to growth: Unified growth theory. In Aghion, Philippe and Durlauf, Steven (eds.) Handbook of Economic Growth, 1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 171293. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Galor, O. (2010) The 2008 Klein Lecture: Comparative economic development: Insights from unified growth theory. International Economic Review 51, 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galor, O. and Weil, D. N. (1999) From Malthusian stagnation to modern growth. American Economic Review 89, 150154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galor, O. and Weil, D. N. (2000) Population, technology and growth: From Malthusian stagnation to the demographic transition and beyond. American Economic Review 90, 806828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, G. and Prescott, E. N. (2002) Malthus to Solow. American Economic Review 92, 12051217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kremer, M. (1993) Population growth and technological change: One million B.C. to 1990. Quarterly Journal of Economics 10, 681716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagerlof, N. P. (2006) The Galor–Weil model revisited: A quantitative exercise. Review of Economic Dynamics 9, 116142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, R. E. (2002) The industrial revolution: Past and future. Lectures on Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Maddison, A. (2007) World population, GDP and per capita GDP, 1–2003 AD. Updated August 2007. Available at http://www.ggdc.net/maddison/.Google Scholar
Nerlove, M. and Raut, L. (2003) Growth models with endogeneous population: A general framework. In Rosenzweig, M. R. and Stark, O. (eds), Handbook of Population and Family Economics, pp. 11171174. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Robinson, W. C. (1987) The time cost of children and other household production. Population Studies 41, 313323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, P. (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 94, 10021037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokey, N. (2001) A quantitative model of the British industrial revolution: 1780–1850. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 55, 55109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strulik, H. and Weisdorf, J. (2008) Population, food, and knowledge: A simple unified growth theory. Journal of Economic Growth 13, 195216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamura, R. (1996) From decay to growth: A demographic transition to economic growth. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 20, 12371261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamura, R. (2002) Human capital and the switch from agriculture to industry. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 27, 207242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, P. and Xie, D. (2004). Activation of a modern industry. Journal of Development Economics 74 (2), 393410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisdorf, J. L. (2004) From stagnation to growth: Revisiting three historical regimes. Journal of Population Economics 17 (3), 455472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrigley, E. A., Davies, R. S., Oeppen, J. E. and Schofield, R. S. (1997) English Population History from Family Reconstitution, 15801837. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrigley, E. A. and Schofield, R. S. (1989) The Population History of England, 1541–1871: A Reconstruction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar