Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:27:21.838Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Longevity Risk and Annuity Pricing with the Lee-Carter Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2011

S. J. Richards
Affiliation:
4 Caledonian Place, Edinburgh EH11 2AS, U.K. Tel: +44(0)131 315 4470; E-mail: stephen@longevitas.co.uk; Web: www.longevitas.co.uk

Abstract

Several important classes of liability are sensitive to the direction of future mortality trends, and this paper presents some recent developments in fitting smooth models to historical mortality-experience data. We demonstrate the impact these models have on mortality projections, and the resulting impact which these projections have on financial products. We base our work round the Lee-Carter family of models. We find that each model fit, while using the same data and staying within the Lee-Carter family, can change the direction of the mortality projections. The main focus of the paper is to demonstrate the impact of these projections on various financial calculations, and we provide a number of ways of quantifying, both graphically and numerically, the model risk in such calculations. We conclude that the impact of our modelling assumptions is financially material. In short, there is a need for awareness of model risk when assessing longevity-related liabilities, especially for annuities and pensions.

Type
Sessional meetings: papers and abstracts of discussions
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brouhns, N., Denuit, M., & Vermunt, J.K.,(2002). A Poisson log-bilinear approach to the construction of projected lifetables. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 31(3), 373393.Google Scholar
Cairns, A.J.G. (2004). A family of term-structure models for long-term risk management and derivative pricing. Mathematical Finance, 14(3), 415444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, A.J.G., Blake, D., Dowd, K., Coughlan, G.D., Epstein, D., Ong, A., & Balevich, I., (2007). A quantitative comparison of stochastic mortality models using data from England and Wales and the United States. Working paper, Heriot-Watt University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CEIOPS (Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors) (2007). QIS4 technical specifications, December 2007.Google Scholar
CMI (Mortality Sub-Committee) (2002). An interim basis for adjusting the 92 Series mortality projections for cohort effects. Working paper No. 1.Google Scholar
CMI (Mortality Committee) (2005). Projecting future mortality: towards a proposal for a stochastic methodology. Working paper No. 15.Google Scholar
CMI (Life-Office Mortality Committee) (2007). Stochastic projection methodologies: Lee- Carter model features, example results and implications. Working paper No. 25.Google Scholar
Currie, I.D., Durban, M., & Eilers, P.H.C. (2004). Smoothing and forecasting mortality rates. Statistical Modelling, 4, 279298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Boor, C., (2001). A practical guide to splines. Revised edition. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 27. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
Delwarde, A., Denuit, M., & Eilers, P.H.C. (2007). Smoothing the Lee-Carter and Poisson log-bilinear models for mortality forecasting: a penalised likelihood approach. Statistical Modelling, 7, 2948.Google Scholar
Eilers, P.H.C. & Marx, B.D.,(1996). Flexible smoothing with B-splines and penalties. Statistical Science, 11, 89121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FSA (2008). Prudential sourcebook for Insurers (INSPRU). Financial Services Authority, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Government Actuary's Department (2005). Occupational pension schemes: the thirteenth survey by the Government Actuary. GAD.Google Scholar
Kingdom, J., (2008). Mortality improvement. Reinsurance News. Society of Actuaries, August 2008, 1417.Google Scholar
Lee, R.D., & Carter, L., (1992). Modelling and forecasting the time series of U.S. mortality. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 659671.Google Scholar
Longevitas Development Team (2008). Longevitas v2.3. Longevitas Ltd, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. URL http://www.longevitas.co.ukGoogle Scholar
Pensions Regulator (2008a). Good practice when choosing assumptions for defined benefit pension schemes with a special focus on mortality. Consultation document, February 2008.Google Scholar
Pensions Regulator (2008b). Good practice when choosing assumptions for defined benefit pension schemes with a special focus on mortality. Response to consultation document, September 2008.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2004). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.r-project.orgGoogle Scholar
Renshaw, A.E., & Haberman, S., (2006). A cohort-based extension to the Lee-Carter model for mortality reduction factors. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 38(3), 556570.Google Scholar
Richards, S.J., & Jones, G.L., (2004). Financial aspects of longevity risk. Paper presented to the Staple Inn Actuarial Society.Google Scholar
Richards, S.J., Kirkby, J.G., & Currie, I.D., (2006). The importance of year of birth in two-dimensional mortality data. British Actuarial Journal, 12, 561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, S.J., Ellam, J.R., Hubbard, J., Lu, J.L.C., Makin, S.J., & Miller, K.A., (2007). Two-dimensional mortality data: patterns and projections. British Actuarial Journal, 13, 479536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, S.J.,(2008a). Detecting year-of-birth mortality patterns with limited data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (2008), 171(1), 279298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, S.J.,(2008b). Applying survival models to pensioner mortality data. British Actuarial Journal, 14, 257303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willets, R.C.,(2007). Recent developments in mortality. Paternoster presentation.Google Scholar