Cambridge Journals Online

Cambridge Journals Online
Skip to content
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (2006), 12: 649-656 Cambridge University Press
Copyright © 2006 The International Neuropsychological Society
doi:10.1017/S1355617706060760
Published online by Cambridge University Press 08 Sep 2006


The attenuation of auditory neglect by implicit cues


A. RAND  COLEMAN  a1 and J. MICHAEL  WILLIAMS  a1 c1
a1 Department of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Article author query
coleman ar   [PubMed] [Google Scholar
williams jm   [PubMed] [Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examined implicit semantic and rhyming cues on perception of auditory stimuli among nonaphasic participants who suffered a lesion of the right cerebral hemisphere and auditory neglect of sound perceived by the left ear. Because language represents an elaborate processing of auditory stimuli and the language centers were intact among these patients, it was hypothesized that interactive verbal stimuli presented in a dichotic manner would attenuate neglect. The selected participants were administered an experimental dichotic listening test composed of six types of word pairs: unrelated words, synonyms, antonyms, categorically related words, compound words, and rhyming words. Presentation of word pairs that were semantically related resulted in a dramatic reduction of auditory neglect. Dichotic presentations of rhyming words exacerbated auditory neglect. These findings suggest that the perception of auditory information is strongly affected by the specific content conveyed by the auditory system. Language centers will process a degraded stimulus that contains salient language content. A degraded auditory stimulus is neglected if it is devoid of content that activates the language centers or other cognitive systems. In general, these findings suggest that auditory neglect involves a complex interaction of intact and impaired cerebral processing centers with content that is selectively processed by these centers (JINS, 2006, 12, 649–656.)

(Received February 18 2006)
(Revised April 23 2006)
(Accepted April 25 2006)


Key Words: Auditory perception; Auditory cortex disorder; Central auditory disease; Auditory processing disorder; Auditory inattention.

Correspondence:
c1 Correspondence and reprint requests to: J. Michael Williams, Ph.D., Drexel University, Mail Stop 626, Psychology – Bellet Building, 15th & Race Street, Philadelphia, PA 19102. E-mail: mike.williams@drexel.edu


Cambridge University Press