Cambridge Journals Online

Cambridge Journals Online
Skip to content
International Psychogeriatrics (2005), 17: 631-652 Cambridge University Press
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2005
doi:10.1017/S1041610205002188
Published online by Cambridge University Press 25 Oct 2005


Neuroleptic and benzodiazepine use in long-term care in urban and rural Alberta: characteristics and results of an education intervention to ensure appropriate use


Brad F. Hagen a1, Chris Armstrong-Esther a1, Paddy Quail a2, Robert J. Williams a1, Peter Norton a2, Carole-Lynn Le Navenec a3, Roland Ikuta a4, Maureen Osis a3, Val Congdon a5 and Roxane Zieb a6
a1 School of Health Sciences, The University of Lethbridge, Canada
a2 Department of Family Medicine, The University of Calgary, Canada
a3 Faculty of Nursing, The University of Calgary, Canada
a4 Senior's Health, Chinook Health Region, Canada
a5 Rural Health, Calgary Health Region, Canada
a6 Calgary Health Region, Canada

Article author query
hagen bf   [PubMed] [Google Scholar
armstrong-esther c   [PubMed] [Google Scholar
quail p   [PubMed] [Google Scholar
williams rj   [PubMed] [Google Scholar
norton p   [PubMed] [Google Scholar
navenec cl   [PubMed] [Google Scholar
ikuta r   [PubMed] [Google Scholar
osis m   [PubMed] [Google Scholar
congdon v   [PubMed] [Google Scholar
zieb r   [PubMed] [Google Scholar

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the use of psychotropic drugs in 24 rural and urban long-term care (LTC) facilities, and compare the effect of an education intervention for LTC staff and family members on the use of psychotropic drugs in intervention versus control facilities.

Methods: Interrupted time series with a non-equivalent no-treatment control group time series. Data on drug use were collected in 24 Western Canadian LTC facilities (10 urban, 14 rural) for three 2-month time periods before and after the intervention. Pharmacy records were used to collect data on drug, class of drug, dose, administration, and start/stop dates. Chart reviews provided demographics, pro re nata (prn) use, and indications for drug use. Subjects comprised 2443 residents living in the 24 LTC facilities during the 1-year study. An average of 796.33 residents (32.7%) received a psychotropic drug. An education intervention on psychotropic drug use in LTC was offered to intervention physicians, nursing staff, pharmacists and family members.

Results: Approximately one-third of residents received a psychotropic drug during the study, often for considerable lengths of time. A minority of psychotropic drug prescriptions had a documented reason for their use, and 69.5% of the reasons would be inappropriate under Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) legislation. Few psychotropic drug prescriptions were discontinued or reduced during the study. More urban LTC residents received neuroleptics and benzodiazepines than their rural counterparts (26.1% vs. 15.7%, and 18.0% vs. 7.6%, respectively). The education intervention did not result in any significant decline in the use of these drugs in intervention facilities.

Conclusion: The results suggest substantial use of psychotropic drugs in LTC, although rural LTC residents received approximately half the number of psychotropic drugs compared with urban residents. A resource-intensive intervention did not significantly decrease the use of psychotropics. There is a need for better monitoring of psychotropic drugs in LTC, particularly given that voluntary educational efforts alone may be ineffective agents of change.

(Received November 18 2004)
(returned for revision February 7 2005)
(revised version received February 21 2005)
(Accepted February 23 2005)


Key Words: benzodiazepines; antipsychotic agents; nursing homes; continuing medical education; aged.

Correspondence:
c1 Correspondence should be addressed to: Brad Hagen, 4401 University Drive, The University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta T1K 0N1, Canada. Fax: +1 403 329 2668. Email: brad.hagen@uleth.ca.


Cambridge University Press