We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 October 2008
The ‘land question’ occupies a central role in the history of Highland Scotland. The system of estate ownership and tenure introduced in the aftermath of the battle of Culloden (1746) commodified the land as private possession. In its wake came mass evictions of tenants in large-scale ‘Clearances’ designed to convert crofting-lands to other agrarian or sporting uses. During the main period of Clearances (1780–1855), protest by the crofters remained spontaneous and sporadic. It was not until the last part of the nineteenth century, especially during the so-called Crofters' War (1881–96), that a resurgent crofting community engaged in sustained protest. The threat of civil unrest prompted some ameliorative measures, most notably the Crofters' Holdings (Scotland) Act of 1886. This stabilised the situation and gave protection from further mass evictions but did not restore lands to the landless population from which their ancestors had been displaced. The demand for restitution, therefore, remained a powerful rallying cry.
1. Dworkin, G., ‘Paternalism’, in Wasserstrom, R.A., ed. Morality and the Law (Belmont, 1971), p. 108.Google Scholar
2. For fuller discussion, see John, R. and Gold, Margaret M., Imagining Scotland: Tradition, Representation and Promotion in Scottish Tourism since 1750 (Aldershot, 1995), chap. iii.Google Scholar
3. Hunter, James, The Making of the Crofting Community (Edinburgh, 1976), pp. 26–33.Google Scholar For other recent sources on the origins and development of the crofting system, see John, R. and Gold, Margaret M., Scottish Crofting: A New Selected Bibliography Discussion paper 26, Geography Unit, Oxford Brookes University (Oxford, 1991)Google Scholar. In passing, it is worth noting that the agrarian system pre-1750 also possessed elements of occupational pluralism. What made the modern system different was the extent to which its organisation was dictated by commercial factors.
4. A labour-intensive industry involving collection and burning of seaweed to produce such chemicals as iodine and carbonate of soda.
5. Richards, Eric, A History of the Highland Clearances: vol. 2 ‘Emigration, Protest, Reasons’, (London, 1985), p. 301.Google Scholar
6. MacLean, Sorley, ‘Vale of tears: a view of Highland history to 1886’, in MacLean, Malcolm and Carrell, Christopher, eds. As an Fhearann: From the land (Edinburgh, 1986), p. 14.Google Scholar
7. See Withers, C.W.J., Gaelic Scotland: The Transformation of a Culture Region (London, 1988), pp. 373–6.Google Scholar
8. An excellent guide to the tactics of popular protest can be found in Grigor, Iain Fraser, Mightier than a Lord: The Highland Crofters’ Struggle for Land (Stornoway, 1979).Google Scholar
9. Valuable information on the founding of The Highlander and the work of John Murdoch can be found in Hunter, James, ed. For the People's Cause: From the Writings of John Murdoch, Highland and Irish Land Reformer (Edinburgh, 1986).Google Scholar
10. Its political wing, the Crofters’ Party, captured four seats in the General Election of January 1886.
11. See, for example, Kellas, J.G., ‘The Crofters' War, 1882–88’, History Today, 12, pp. 281–8Google Scholar; Gibson, R., Crofter Power in Easter Ross: The Land League at Work (Inverness, 1986).Google Scholar
12. Orr, Willie, Deer Forests, Landlords and Crofters: The Western Highlands in Victorian and Edwardian Times (Edinburgh, 1982), p. 120.Google Scholar
13. In 1894, for example, a Royal Commission reported that there were approximately 1000 cottars and squatters in Lewis besides 3074 crofters.
14. James Hunter, in particular, praised the Board's work in agrarian improvement as laying ‘the basis of much of the comparative prosperity of modern crofting life’. See Hunter, , The Making of the Crofting Community, pp. 184–5.Google Scholar
15. Mather, A.S., State-Aided Land Settlement in Scotland (Aberdeen, 1978).Google Scholar
16. Port Sunlight is located across the River Mersey from Liverpool and centred on the soapworks that provided its employment focus. For sources, both historical and contemporary, on Port Sunlight itself, see Meakin, J.E. Budgett, Model Factories and Villages: The Ideal Conditions of Labour and Housing (London, 1905)Google Scholar; Reynolds, J., ‘The Model Village of Port Sunlight’, Architects’ Journal, 107 (1947), 493–6Google Scholar; Creese, W., The Search for Environment: the Garden City, Before and After (New Haven, CN, 1966), pp. 108–43Google Scholar; and Hubbard, E. and Shippobottom, M., A Guide to Port Sunlight Village (Liverpool, 1988).Google Scholar
17. Characterised in one text as the ‘intellectual journey from Owen to Lever’, see Colin, and Bell, Rose, City Fathers: The Early History of Town Planning in Britain (Harmondsworth, 1972), p. 262.Google Scholar In passing, it may be noted that Port Sunlight was not the only expression of Leverhulme's interest in environmental improvement. Earlier projects included the building and elaborate landscaping of Roynton Cottage near Bolton and the village of Thornton Hough in Cheshire.
18. Ward, Stephen V., Planning and Urban Change (London, 1994), p. 21.Google Scholar See also Pollard, Sidney, ‘The factory village of the Industrial Revolution’, English Historical Review 79 (1964), 513–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Milburn, G.E., Piety, Profit and Paternalism: Methodists in Business in the North-East of England, c. 1760–1920, Wesley Historical Society Lectures 49 (Bunbury, Cheshire, 1983)Google Scholar; and Roberts, D., Paternalism in Early Victorian England (London, 1979), especially chap. vii.Google Scholar
19. Randall, A. and Newman, E., ‘Protest, proletarians and paternalists: social conflict in rural Wiltshire’, Rural History, 6 (1995), 206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Dworkin, , ‘Paternalism’, p. 108.Google Scholar For more discussion on the relationship between the ‘self and the ‘social’, see Joyce, Patrick, Democratic Subjects: The Self and the Social in Nineteenth-century Britain (Cambridge, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Kleinig, J., Paternalism (Manchester, 1983), p. 5.Google Scholar
22. See Leverhulme, Viscount, The Six Hour Day and Other Industrial Questions, ed. Unwin, S. (London, 1918)Google Scholar.
23. Milburn, , Piety, Profit and Paternalism, pp. 24–5.Google Scholar
24. Nicolson, Nigel, The Lord of the Isles (London, 1960), p. 21.Google Scholar
25. Wilson, C.L., The History of Unilever: A Study in Economic Growth and Social Change (London, 1954), vol. 1.Google Scholar
26. Jolly, W., Lord Leverhulme: A Biography (London, 1976), pp. 95–131.Google Scholar
27. Glasgow Herald, 13 July 1918.
28. This is reflected by the fact that Leverhulme paid only £143,000 for the estates. Even together with extra payments for moveable property and rent arrears, his total outlay only amounted to £167,000.
29. Stornoway Gazette (henceforth SG), 14 March 1919.
30. SG, 25 July 1919.
31. SG, 12 October 1922.
32. Daily Chronicle, 15 January 1919.
33. SG, 25 July 1919.
34. SG, 3 December 1920.
35. Nicolson, The Lord of the Isles, p. 118.
36. SG, 24 January 1919.
37. Although it is worth remembering that subsidised light railways and tramways were built in East Anglia and other parts of Great Britain at the turn of the century to encourage rural development.
38. SG, 23 June 1919.
39. SG, 23 August 1919.
40. This was not simply part of a desire for grandeur. The original town hall and library had burnt down in March 1918 and needed replacing.
41. The Scotsman, 1 July 1919.
42. SG, 23 June 1919.
43. By mid-1919, for example, Leverhulme's wages bill on the island totalled £3000 per week, with 400 men employed on the Tolsta-Skegirsta Road alone. Leverhulme was by far the island's biggest employer.
44. Hunter, The Making of the Crofting Community, p. 196.
45. The Scotsman, 27 June 1919.
46. Hunter, The Making of the Crofting Community, p. 197.
47. SG, 14 November 1919.
48. SG, 8 October 1920.
49. SG, 6 September 1923.
50. Burgess, Jacquelin, ‘The cultural politics of nature conservation and economic development’, in Anderson, K. and Gale, F., eds. Inventing Places (Melbourne, 1992), p. 236.Google Scholar
51. MacDonald, Colin, Highland Journey (Edinburgh, 1943), p. 198.Google Scholar For more on the content of meetings and arguments presented, see MacLeod, M., ‘Did the people of Lewis refuse Lord Leverhulme's schemes?’, Transactions of the Gaelic Society of Inverness 42 (1958), 257–70.Google Scholar
52. MacDonald, , Highland Journey, 145–6.Google Scholar
