Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T20:44:52.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crystal structure of citalopram hydrobromide, C20H22FN2OBr

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2016

James A. Kaduk ,
Kai Zhong ,
Amy M. Gindhart  and
Thomas N. Blanton
James A. Kaduk*
Affiliation:
Illinois Institute of Technology, 3101 S. Dearborn St., Chicago, Illinois 60616
Kai Zhong
Affiliation:
ICDD, 12 Campus Blvd., Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073-3273
Amy M. Gindhart
Affiliation:
ICDD, 12 Campus Blvd., Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073-3273
Thomas N. Blanton
Affiliation:
ICDD, 12 Campus Blvd., Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073-3273
*
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: kaduk@polycrystallography.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The crystal structure of citalopram hydrobromide has been solved and refined using synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction data, and optimized using density functional theory techniques. Citalopram hydrobromide crystallizes in space group P21/c (#14) with a = 10.766 45(6), b = 33.070 86(16), c = 10.892 85(5) Å, β = 90.8518(3)°, V = 3878.03(4) Å3, and Z = 8. N–H⋯Br hydrogen bonds are important to the structure, but the crystal energy is dominated by van der Waals attraction. The powder pattern was submitted to International Centre for Diffraction Data for inclusion in the Powder Diffraction File™.

Keywords

citalopram hydrobromideCelexaCipramilpowder diffractionRietveld refinementdensity functional theory
Type
Technical Articles
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 176 - 184
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, F. H. (2002). “The Cambridge Structural Database: a quarter of a million crystal structures and rising,” Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B: Struct. Sci. 58, 380–388.Google Scholar
Altomare, A., Cuocci, C., Giacovazzo, C., Moliterni, A., Rizzi, R., Corriero, N., and Falcicchio, A. (2013). “EXPO2013: a kit of tools for phasing crystal structures from powder data”, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 46, 1231–1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L., and Chang, N. L. (1995). “Patterns in hydrogen bonding: functionality and graph set analysis in crystals,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34(15), 1555–1573.Google Scholar
Bogeso, K. P. and Lundbeck, H. (1987). “Novel Intermediate and Method for Its Preparation,” US Patent 4,650,884.Google Scholar
Bravais, A. (1866). Etudes Cristallographiques (Gauthier Villars, Paris).Google Scholar
Bruno, I. J., Cole, J. C., Kessler, M., Luo, J., Motherwell, W. D. S., Purkis, L. H., Smith, B. R., Taylor, R., Cooper, R. I., Harris, S. E., and Orpen, A. G. (2004). “Retrieval of crystallographically-derived molecular geometry information,” J. Chem. Inf. Sci. 44, 2133–2144.Google Scholar
Dassault Systèmes (2014). Materials Studio 8.0 (BIOVIA, San Diego, CA).Google Scholar
David, W. I. F., Shankland, K., van de Streek, J., Pidcock, E., Motherwell, W. D. S., and Cole, J. C. (2006). “DASH: a program for crystal structure determination from powder diffraction data,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 39, 910–915.Google Scholar
de Diego, H. L., Bond, A. D., and Dancer, R. J. (2011). “Formation of solid solutions between racemic and enantiomeric citalopram oxalate,” Chirality 23(5), 408–416.Google Scholar
Donnay, J. D. H. and Harker, D. (1937). “A new law of crystal morphology extending the law of Bravais,” Amer. Mineral. 22, 446–467.Google Scholar
Dovesi, R., Orlando, R., Civalleri, B., Roetti, C., Saunders, V. R., and Zicovich-Wilson, C. M. (2005). “CRYSTAL: a computational tool for the ab initio study of the electronic properties of crystals,” Z. Kristallogr. 220, 571–573.Google Scholar
Etter, M. C. (1990). “Encoding and decoding hydrogen-bond patterns of organic compounds,” Acc. Chem. Res. 23(4), 120–126.Google Scholar
Finger, L. W., Cox, D. E., and Jephcoat, A. P. (1994). “A correction for powder diffraction peak asymmetry due to axial divergence,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 27(6), 892–900.Google Scholar
Friedel, G. (1907). “Etudes sur la loi de Bravais,” Bull. Soc. Fr. Mineral. 30, 326–455.Google Scholar
Gatti, C., Saunders, V. R., and Roetti, C. (1994). “Crystal-field effects on the topological properties of the electron-density in molecular crystals – the case of urea,” J. Chem. Phys. 101, 10686–10696.Google Scholar
Harrison, W. T., Yathirajan, H. S., Bindya, S., and Anilkumar, H. G. (2007). “Escitalopram oxalate: co-existence of oxalate dianions and oxalic acid molecules in the same crystal,” Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C: Crystal Struct. Commun. 63(2), o129–o131.Google Scholar
Hirshfeld, F. L. (1977). “Bonded-atom fragments for describing molecular charge densities,” Theor. Chem. Acta 44, 129–138.Google Scholar
ICDD (2015), PDF-4+ 2014 (Database), edited by Dr. Soorya Kabekkodu, International Centre for Diffraction Data, Newtown Square, PA, USA.Google Scholar
Ikemoto, T., Arai, N., and Igi, M. (2001). “Citalopram hydrobromide crystal and method for crystallization thereof,” European Patent Application EP 1,152,000.Google Scholar
Larson, A. C. and Von Dreele, R. B. (2004). General Structure Analysis System, (GSAS), (Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LAUR 86-784).Google Scholar
Lee, P. L., Shu, D., Ramanathan, M., Preissner, C., Wang, J., Beno, M. A., Von Dreele, R. B., Ribaud, L., Kurtz, C., Antao, S. M., Jiao, X., and Toby, B. H. (2008). “A twelve-analyzer detector system for high-resolution powder diffraction,” J. Synchroton Radiat. 15(5), 427–432.Google Scholar
Macrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J., and Wood, P. A. (2008). “Mercury CSD 2.0 – new features for the visualization and investigation of crystal structures,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 41, 466–470.Google Scholar
McKinnon, J. J., Spackman, M. A., and Mitchell, A. S. (2004). “Novel tools for visualizing and exploring intermolecular interactions in molecular crystals,” Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B: Struct. Sci. 60, 627–668.Google Scholar
Nada, R., Catlow, C. R. A., Pisani, C., and Orlando, R. (1993). “Ab initio Hartree-Fock perturbed-cluster study of neutral defects in LiF,” Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1, 165–187.Google Scholar
O'Boyle, N., Banck, M., James, C. A., Morley, C., Vandermeersch, , and Hutchison, G. R. (2011). “Open babel: an open chemical toolbox,” J. Chem. Inf., 3, 33. doi: 10.1186/1758-2946-3-33.Google Scholar
Peintinger, M. F., Vilela Oliveira, D., and Bredow, T. (2012). “Consistent gaussian basis sets of triple-zeta valence with polarization quality for solid-state calculations,” J. Comput. Chem. 34(6), 451–459. doi: 10.1002/jcc.23153 Google Scholar
Shields, G. P., Raithby, P. R., Allen, F. H., and Motherwell, W. S. (2000). “The assignment and validation of metal oxidation states in the Cambridge Structural Database,” Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B: Struct. Sci. 56(3), 455–465.Google Scholar
Spackman, M. A. and Jayatilaka, D. (2009). “Hirshfeld surface analysis,” CrystEngComm 11, 19–32.Google Scholar
Stephens, P. W. (1999). “Phenomenological model of anisotropic peak broadening in powder diffraction,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 32, 281–289.Google Scholar
Sykes, R. A., McCabe, P., Allen, F. H., Battle, G. M., Bruno, I. J., and Wood, P. A. (2011). “New software for statistical analysis of Cambridge Structural Database data,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 882–886.Google Scholar
Thompson, P., Cox, D. E., and Hastings, J. B. (1987). “Rietveld refinement of Debye–Scherrer synchrotron X-ray data from Al2O3 ,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 20(2), 79–83.Google Scholar
Toby, B. H. (2001). “EXPGUI, a graphical user interface for GSAS,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 34, 210–213.Google Scholar
van de Streek, J. and Neumann, M. A. (2014). “Validation of molecular crystal structures from powder diffraction data with dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT-D),” Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B: Struct. Sci. 70(6), 1020–1032.Google Scholar
Wang, J., Toby, B. H., Lee, P. L., Ribaud, L., Antao, S. M., Kurtz, C., Ramanathan, M., Von Dreele, R. B., and Beno, M. A. (2008). “A dedicated powder diffraction beamline at the Advanced Photon Source: commissioning and early operational results,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 79, 085105.Google Scholar
Wavefunction, Inc. (2013). Spartan ‘14 Version 1.1.0, Wavefunction Inc., 18401 Von Karman Ave., Suite 370, Irvine CA 92612.Google Scholar
Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., McKinnon, M. J., Turner, M. J., Jayatilaka, D., and Spackman, M. A. (2012). CrystalExplorer Version 3.1 (University of Western Australia).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Kaduk supplementary material

Kaduk supplementary material 1

Download Kaduk supplementary material(File)
File 44.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Kaduk supplementary material

Kaduk supplementary material 2

Download Kaduk supplementary material(File)
File 661.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Kaduk supplementary material

Kaduk supplementary material 3

Download Kaduk supplementary material(File)
File 11.6 KB