Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-p566r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-17T10:05:40.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Doctor-Patient Communication: Principles and Practices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

Suzanne M. Kurtz*
Affiliation:
Faculties of Medicine and Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
*
S.M. Kurtz, Education Tower 1102, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4 Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

In a formal needs assessment, conducted prior to the Canadian Headache Society's recent national continuing education workshop, participants expressed particular enthusiasm for enhancing their own communication skills or their teaching of those skills.

Objectives:

Responding to both interests, this paper offers a practical conceptual framework for thinking systematically about how to improve physician-patient communication to a professional level of competence.

Methods:

The three-part, evidence-based framework first defines communication in medicine in terms of five underlying assumptions about communication and the learning of communication skills. It then discusses three categories of communication skills (content, process, and perceptual skills) and six goals that physicians and patients work to achieve through their communication with each other. The second part of the framework explores “first principles” of effective communication and includes a brief look at the historical context that has significantly influenced our thinking about, and practice of communication in health care. Part three of the framework describes one approach for delineating and organizing the specific skills that research supports for communicating effectively with patients - the Calgary Cambridge Guide.

Results:

It is clear from the literature that better physician communication skills improve patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes and that good communication skills can be taught and learned.

Conclusions:

It is important that physicians learn the principles of good physician-patient communication and apply them in clinical practice. Medical education programs at all levels should include teaching of physician-patient communication.

Résumé:

RÉSUMÉ:Introduction:

Lors d'une évaluation formelle des besoins, effectuée avant l'atelier d'éducation médicale continue de la Canadian Headache Society tenu récemment, les participants ont manifesté le désir d'augmenter leurs aptitudes à communiquer ou leur expertise dans l'enseignement de ces aptitudes.

Objectifs:

En réponse à ces deux besoins, cet article offre un encadrement conceptuel pratique pour concevoir systématiquement comment améliorer la communication médecin-patient jusqu'à un niveau de compétence professionnel.

Méthodes:

Le modèle en trois parties, basé sur des données probantes, définit la communication en médecine en termes de cinq prémices sous-jacentes à la communication et à l'apprentissage des compétences en communication. Suit une discussion sur trois catégories d'aptitudes (contenu, processus et aptitudes de perception) et six buts que les médecins et les patients visent à atteindre dans leur communication entre eux. La deuxième partie du modèle explore les principes de base de la communication efficace et inclut un aperçu du contexte historique qui a influencé significativement notre pensée et notre pratique de la communication dans les soins de santé. La troisième partie du modèle décrit une approche pour définir et organiser les compétences spécifiques appuyées par la recherche sur la communication efficace avec les patients – les Calgary Cambridge Guides.

Résultats:

D'après la littérature, il est clair que de meilleures aptitudes à communiquer chez le médecin améliore la satisfaction du patient et les résultats cliniques et que de bonnes aptitudes à communiquer peuvent être enseignées et apprises.

Conclusions:

Il est important que les médecins apprennent les principes d'une bonne communication médecin-patient et les appliquent en pratique clinique. Les programmes d'éducation médicale à tous les niveaux devraient inclure l'enseignement de la communication médecin-patient.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2002

References

1. Kurtz, S, Silverman, J, Draper, J. Teaching and Learning Communication Skills in Medicine. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press, 1998.Google Scholar
2. Silverman, J, Kurtz, S, Draper, J. Skills for Communicating with Patients. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press, 1998.Google Scholar
3. Aspergren, K. Teaching and learning communication skills in medicine: a review with quality grading of articles. Med Teach 1999;21(6).Google Scholar
4. Maguire, P, Fairbairn, S, Fletcher, C. Consultation skills of young doctor: II - Most young doctors are bad at giving information. BMJ 1986; 292:15768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Waitzkin, H. Information giving in medical care. J Health Soc Behav 1985; 26:81101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Stewart, MA. Comparison of Two methods of analysing doctor-patient communication. Paper presented at the North American Primary Care Research Group, Seattle. 1985.Google Scholar
7. Stewart, M, Brown, JB, Boon, H, et al. Evidence on patient-doctor communication. Cancer Prev Control 1999; 3(1): 2530.Google Scholar
8. Stewart, M, Belle Brown, J, Weston, WW, et al. Patient Centred Medicine: Transforming the Clinical Method. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, 1995.Google Scholar
9. The Headache Study Group of the University of Western Ontario. Predictors of outcome in headache patients presenting to family physicians - a one year prospective study. Headache J 1986;26: 285294.Google Scholar
10. Beckman, HB, Frankel, RM. The effect of physician behaviour on the collection of data. Ann Int Med 1984; 101:692696.rCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Marvel, MK, Epstein, RM, Flowers, K, Beckman, HB. Soliciting the patient’s agenda: have we improved? JAMA 1999;281(3), 283287.Google Scholar
12. Coambs, RB, Jensen, P, Hoa Her, M, et al. Review of the Scientific Literature on the Prevalence, Consequences, and Health Costs of Noncompliance & Inappropriate Use of Prescription Medication in Canada. Ottawa: Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association of Canada (University of Toronto Press), 1995.Google Scholar
13. Miller, GE. Commentary on clinical skills assessment: a specific review. Philadelphia: National Board of Medical Examiners 75th Anniversary 1990:4851.Google Scholar
14. Barbour, A. Making contact or making sense: functional and dysfunctional ways of relating. Paper presented for Humanities Institute Lecture 1999-2000 Series, University of Denver, 2000.Google Scholar
15. Baker, SJ. The theory of silences. J Gen Psychology 1955; 53:145.Google Scholar
16. Starfield, B, Wray, C, Hess, K, et al. The influence of patient-practitioner agreement on outcome of care. AJPH. 1981;71:127131.Google Scholar
17. Stewart, MA, McWhinney, I, Buck, CW. The doctor-patient relationship and its effect upon outcome. J R Coll Gen Pract 1979;29:7782.Google Scholar
18. Stewart, M, Belle Brown, J, Donner, A, et al. The impact of patient-centred care on patient outcomes in family practice (Research Report: Thames Valley Family Practice Research Unit, Ontario), 1997.Google Scholar
19. Dance, FEX, Larson, CE. Speech communication: concepts and behaviour. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winson, 1972.Google Scholar
20. Dance, FEX. Toward a theory of human communication. In: Dance, FEX, (Ed). Human Communication Theory: Original Essays. New York: Holt, Rhinehart, Winston, 1967.Google Scholar
21. Kurtz, SM, Silverman, JD. The Calgary-Cambridge Observation Guides: an aid to defining the curriculum and organising the teaching in communication training programmes. Med Ed 1996; 30:8389.Google Scholar
22. Riccardi, VM, Kurtz, SM. Communication and counseling in health care. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C Thomas, 1983.Google Scholar