Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-27T17:04:19.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transmutation theory and rank for quantum braided groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Shahn Majid
Shahn Majid
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 9EW
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Let f: H1 → H2be any pair of quasitriangular Hopf algebras over k with a Hopf algebra map f between them. We construct in this situation a quasitriangular Hopf algebra B(H1, f, H2) in the braided monoidal category of H1-modules. It consists in the same algebra as H2 with a modified comultiplication and has a quasitriangular structure given by the ratio of those of H1 and H2. This transmutation procedure trades a non-cocommutative Hopf algebra in the category of k-modules for a more cocommutative object in a more non-commutative category. As an application, every Hopf algebra containing the group algebra of ℤ2 becomes transmuted to a super-Hopf algebra.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 113 , Issue 1 , January 1993 , pp. 45 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Deligne, P. and Milne, J. S.. Tannakian Categories. Lecture Notes in Math. vol. 900 (Springer-Verlag, 1982).Google Scholar
[2]Drinfeld, V. G.. Quantum groups. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Berkeley 1986 (American Mathematical Society, 1987), pp. 798–820.Google Scholar
[3]Freyd, P. and Yetter, D.. Braided compact closed categories with applications to low dimensional topology. Adv. in Math. 77 (1989), 156–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Gurevich, D. I. and Majid, S.. Braided groups of Hopf algebras obtained by twisting. Pacific J. Math., to appear.Google Scholar
[5]Jimbo, M.. A q-difference analog of U(g) and the Yang–Baxter equation. Lett. Math. Phys. 10 (1985), 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Joyal, A. and Street, R.. Braided monoidal categories. Mathematics Reports 86008, Macquarie University (1986).Google Scholar
[7]Joyal, A. and Street, R.. The geometry of tensor calculus, I. Adv. in Math. 8 (1991), 55–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Lyubashenko, V. V. and Majid, S.. Braided groups and quantum fourier transform. Preprint (1991).Google Scholar
[9]Macfarlane, A. and Majid, S.. Quantum group structure in a fermionic extension of the quantum harmonic oscillator. Phys. Lett. B 268 (1991), 71–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]MacLane, S.. Categories for the Working Mathematician. Graduate Texts in Math. vol. 5 (Springer-Verlag, 1974).Google Scholar
[11]Majid, S.. Quasi-triangular Hopf algebras and Yang–Baxter equations. Internal. J. Modern Phys. A 5 (1990), 1–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Majid, S.. Physics for algebraists: Non-commutative and non-cocommutative Hopf algebras by a bicrossproduct construction. J. Algebra 130 (1990), 17–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Majid, S.. Braided groups and algebraic quantum field theories. Lett. Math. Phys. 22 (1991), 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Majid, S.. Anyonic quantum groups. Preprint (1991).Google Scholar
[15]Majid, S.. Examples of braided groups and braided matrices. J. Math. Phys. 32 (1991). 3246–3253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Majid, S.. Cross products by braided groups and bosinization. J. Algebra, to appear.Google Scholar
[17]Majid, S.. Principle of representation-theoretic self-duality. Phys. Essays 4 (1991), 395–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Majid, S.. Reconstruction theorems and rational conformal field theories. Internal. J. Mod. Phys. 6 (1991), 4359–4374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Majid, S.. Braided groups. J. Pure Appl. Algebra, to appear.Google Scholar
[20]Majid, S.. Representations, duals and quantum doubles of monoidal categories. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo (2) Suppl. 26 (1991), 197–206.Google Scholar
[21]Majid, S.. Representation-theoretic rank and double Hopf algebras. Comm. Algebra 18 (11): 3705–3712 (1990), 3705–3712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Majid, S.. Doubles of quasitriangular Hopf algebras. Comm. Algebra 19 (1991), 3061–3073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Manin, Yu. I.. Quantum groups and non-commutative geometry. Technical report, Centre de Recherches Math, Montreal (1988).Google Scholar
[24]Pareigis, B.. A non-commutative non-cocommutative Hopf algebra in nature. J. Algebra 70 (1981), 356–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25]Radford, D.. On the quasitriangular structures of a semisimple Hopf algebra. J. Algebra 141 (1991), 354–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26]Reshetikhin, N. Yu. and Turaev, V. G.. Ribbon graphs and their invariants derived from quantum groups. Comm. Math. Phys. 127 (1990), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27]Rivano, N. Saavedra. Catégories Tannakiennes. Lecture Notes in Math. vol. 265 (Springer-Verlag, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[28]Sweedler, M. E.. Hopf Algebras (Benjamin, 1969).Google Scholar
[29]Ulbrich, K.-H.. On Hopf algebras and rigid monoidal categories. Israel J. Math. 72 (1990), 252–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar