Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T00:12:32.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Perspectives on African American English: The Role of Black-to-Black Contact

Variation in African American English linked to contact with Geechee

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2015

Simanique Moody
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the most widely researched language varieties in the field of sociolinguistics is African American English (AAE), a term used to describe a range of English dialects, from standard to vernacular, spoken by many (but not all) African Americans as well as by certain members of other ethnic groups who have had extensive contact with AAE speakers. Most linguists agree that AAE developed from contact between enslaved Africans and predominantly English-speaking Europeans (who spoke a range of English vernaculars) during the early to middle period of colonization of what is now known as the United States of America. Consequently, research on the development of AAE is traditionally framed in terms of the degree of contact with white English vernaculars, both during and after AAE genesis, with white vernaculars playing a primary, if not exclusive, role (McDavid & McDavid, 1951; Mufwene, 1996; Poplack, 2000; Poplack & Tagliamonte, 2001). Though some analyses of AAE allow for substrate influence from creole and/or African languages in its development (cf. Winford, 1997, 1998; Rickford, 1998, 2006; Wolfram & Thomas, 2002; Holm, 2004), many studies place a particular focus on Earlier African American varieties or Diaspora varieties, such as the Ex-Slave Recordings, Samaná English, and Liberian Settler English rather than contemporary AAE varieties spoken within U.S. borders (cf. Rickford, 1977, 1997, 2006; DeBose, 1988; Schneider 1989; Bailey, Maynor, & Cukor-Avila, 1991; Hannah, 1997; Singler, 1998, 2007a, 2007b; Kautzsch 2002). This research has helped further linguists’ understanding of AAE yet does not reflect its full history in the United States.

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , December 2015 , pp. 53 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, G., Maynor, N. & Cukor-Avila, P. (eds.) 1991. The Emergence of Black English: Texts and Commentary. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, R. & Shousterman, C. 2010. ‘Second Generation West Indian Americans and English in New York City.’ English Today, 26(3), 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassidy, F. 1980. ‘The place of Gullah.’ American Speech, 55(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassidy, F. 1986a. ‘Some Similarities Between Gullah and Caribbean Creoles.’ In Montgomery, M. & Bailey, G. (eds.), Language Variety in the South: Perspectives in Black and White. Montgomery: University of Alabama Press, pp. 30–37.Google Scholar
Cassidy, F. 1986b ‘Barbadian Creole—Possibility and probability.’ American Speech, 61(3), 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassidy, F. 1994. ‘Gullah and the Caribbean Connection.’ In Montgomery, M. (ed.), The crucible of Carolina: Essays in the development of Gullah language and culture. Athens: University of Georgia Press, pp. 16–22.Google Scholar
Childs, R. 2005. ‘Investigating the Local Construction of Identity: Sociophonetic Variation in Smoky Mountain African American Women's Speech.’ PhD dissertation, Athens: University of Georgia.Google Scholar
Childs, R. & Mallinson, C. 2004. ‘African American English in Appalachia: Dialect Accommodation and Substrate Influence.’ English World-Wide, 25(1), 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, I. 1970. ‘A Syntactic Analysis of Sea Island Creole (‘Gullah’).’ PhD dissertation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Cunningham, I. 1992. ‘A Syntactic Analysis of Sea Island Creole.’ Publication of the American Dialect Society 75. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
DeBose, C. 1988. ‘Be in Samaná English.’ Society for Caribbean Linguistics, Occasional Paper 21. West Indies: School of Education, University of the West Indies.Google Scholar
Green, L. 1998. ‘Remote past and states in African American English.’ American Speech, 73(2), 115–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, L. 2002. African American English: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, I. 1980. ‘Gullah and Barbadian—Origins and Relationships.’ American Speech, 55(1), 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, I. 1986. ‘On the Classification of Afro-Seminole Creole.’ In Montgomery, M. and Bailey, G. (eds.), Language Variety in the South: Perspectives in Black and White. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, pp. 85–101.Google Scholar
Hannah, D. 1997. ‘Copula absence in Samaná English: Implications for research on the linguistic history of African American Vernacular English.’ American Speech, 72(4), 339–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, J. 2004. Languages in Contact: The Partial Restructuring of Vernaculars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kautzsch, A. 2002. The Historical Evolution of Earlier African American English: An Empirical Comparison of Early Sources. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kautzsch, A. & Schneider, E. 2000. ‘Differential Creolization: Some evidence from Earlier African American Vernacular English in South Carolina.’ In Neumann-Holzschuh, I. & Schneider, E. (eds.), Degrees of restructuring in creole languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 247–274.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1972. Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1998. ‘Co-existent systems in African-American Vernacular English.’ In Mufwene, S., Rickford, J., Bailey, G. & Baugh, J. (eds.), African-American English: Structure, History, and Use. New York: Routledge, pp. 110–153.Google Scholar
Labov, W., Cohen, P., Robins, C., & Lewis, J. 1968. ‘A study of the Non-Standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in New York City.’ Final report, Cooperative Research Project 3288, vols. I and II, Philadelphia, PA: U.S. Regional Survey, Linguistics Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Maurer, P. & the APiCS Consortium. 2013. ‘Tense-aspect systems.’ In Michaelis, S., Maurer, P., Haspelmath, M., & Huber, M. (eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Online at <http://apics-online.info/parameters/49> (Accessed July 27, 2015).Google Scholar
McDavid, R. & McDavid, V. 1951. ‘The Relationship of the Speech of American Negroes to the Speech of Whites.’ American Speech, 26(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moody, S. 2011. ‘Language Contact and Regional Variation in African American English: A Study of Southeast Georgia.’ PhD dissertation. New York: New York University.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S. 1986. ‘Number delimitation in Gullah.’ American Speech, 61(1), 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, S. 1993. ‘Gullah's development: Myths and sociohistorical facts.’ Revised version of a paper presented at the Language in society II conference. Auburn University. April, 1993.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S. 1996. ‘The Founder Principle in Creole Genesis.’ Diachronica, 13 (1), 83–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Park Service Publication, July 2005 ‘Low Country Gullah Culture: Special Resource Study and Final Environmental Impact Statement’, Online at <http://www.nps.gov/ethnography/research/docs/ggsrs_book.pdf> (Accessed July 27, 2015).+(Accessed+July+27,+2015).>Google Scholar
Paris, D. 2011. Language across Difference: Ethnicity, Communication, and Youth Identities in Changing Urban Schools. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poplack, S. (ed.) 2000. The English History of African American English. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Poplack, S., & Tagliamonte, S. 2001. African American English in the Diaspora. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rickford, J. 1973. ‘Been in black English.’ Mimeo. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Rickford, J. 1975. ‘Carrying the new wave into syntax: The case of Black English bin.’ In: Fasold, R. & Shuy, R. (eds.), Analyzing Variation in Language. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown U. Press, pp. 162–183.Google Scholar
Rickford, J. 1977. ‘The Question of Prior Creolization in Black English.’ In Valdman, A., (ed.), Pidgin and Creole Linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 126–46.Google Scholar
Rickford, J. 1986. ‘Some Principles for the Study of Black and White Speech in the South.’ In Montgomery, M. & Bailey, G. (eds.), Language Variety in the South. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, pp. 38–62.Google Scholar
Rickford, J. 1997. ‘Prior Creolization of AAVE? Sociohistorical and Textual Evidence from the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries.’ Journal of Sociolinguistics, 1(3), 315–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickford, J. 1998. ‘The Creole Origins of African American Vernacular English: Evidence from copula absence.’ In Mufwene, S., Rickford, J., Bailey, G., and Baugh, J. (eds.), African American English. London: Routledge, pp. 154–200.Google Scholar
Rickford, J. 2006. ‘Down for the count? The Creole Origins Hypothesis of AAVE at the hands of the Ottawa Circle, and their supporters.’ Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 21(1), 97–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, E. 1989. American Earlier Black English: Morphological and Syntactic Variables. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Singler, J. 1998. ‘What's not new in AAVE.’ American Speech, 73(3), 227–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singler, J. 2007a. ‘Samaná and Sinoe, Part I: Stalking the vernacular.’ Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 22(1), 123–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singler, J. 2007b. ‘Samaná and Sinoe, Part II: Provenance.’ Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 22(2), 309–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spears, A. 2008. ‘Pidgins/Creoles and African American English.’ In Kouwenberg, S. & Singler, J. (eds.), The Handbook of Pidgins and Creoles. Malden: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 512–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spears, A. 2010. ‘Getting African American English Right: Shallow Grammar and the Neocreolist Hypothesis.’ Paper presented at the Society for Pidgin and Creole Linguistics winter meeting, January 2010.Google Scholar
Stewart, W. 1968. ‘Continuity and change in American Negro dialects. Florida FL Reporter, 6(1), 3–4, 14–16, 18.Google Scholar
Turner, L. 1949. Africanisms in the Gullah dialect. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Weldon, T. 1998. ‘Exploring the AAVE-Gullah Connection: A comparative study of copula variability.’ PhD dissertation. Columbus: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Weldon, T. 2003a. ‘Revisiting the Creolist Hypothesis: Copula Variability in Gullah and Southern Rural AAVE.’ American Speech, 78 (2), 171–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, T. 2003b. ‘Copula variability in Gullah.’ Language Variation and Change, 15(1), 37–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winford, D. 1992. ‘Back to the past: The BEV/creole connection revisited.’ Language Variation and Change, 4(3), 311–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winford, D. 1993. Predication in Caribbean English Creoles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winford, D. 1997. ‘On the origins of African American Vernacular English—A creolist perspective. Part 1: Sociohistorical Background.’ Diachronica, 14(2), 305–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winford, D. 1998. ‘On the origins of African American Vernacular English—A creolist perspective. Part 2: Linguistic features.’ Diachronica, 15(1), 99–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, W. 1969. A Sociolinguistic Description of Detroit Negro Speech, Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wolfram, W. & Thomas, E. 2002. The Development of African American English. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, P. 1975. Black Majority: Negroes in Colonial South Carolina from 1670 Through the Stono Rebellion. New York: Norton.Google Scholar