Cambridge Journals Online

Cambridge Journals Online
Skip to content
Psychological Medicine
doi:10.1017/S003329170800322X
Published online by Cambridge University Press 26 Mar 2008
Cambridge Journals Online - CUP Full-Text Page
Psychological Medicine Cambridge University Press
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008
doi:10.1017/S003329170800322X

Original Articles

The prevalence of premenstrual dysphoric disorder in a randomly selected group of urban and rural women


S. Gehlerta1 c1, I. H. Songa2, C.-H. Changa3 and S. A. Hartlagea4

a1 Center for Interdisciplinary Health Disparities Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
a2 School of Social Work, Adelphi University, Garden City, New York, USA
a3 Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
a4 Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
Article author query
gehlert s PubMed  Google Scholar
song ih PubMed  Google Scholar
chang c- PubMed  Google Scholar
hartlage sa PubMed  Google Scholar

Abstract

Background Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) was included as a provisional diagnostic category in the appendices of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-III-R (then called late luteal phase dysphoric disorder) and remained as an appendix in DSM-IV. Our study aimed to determine the prevalence of PMDD using all four DSM-IV research diagnostic criteria in a representative sample of women of reproductive age in the United States.

Method Data were collected in the homes of women between the ages of 13 and 55 years in two urban and two rural sites using a random sampling procedure developed by the National Opinion Research Center. Women completed daily symptom questionnaires and provided urine specimens each day for two consecutive ovulatory menstrual cycles (ovulation was estimated for women taking oral contraceptives) and were screened for psychiatric disorders by trained interviewers. Symptoms were counted toward a diagnosis of PMDD if they worsened significantly during the late luteal week during two consecutive ovulatory menstrual cycles, occurred on days in which women reported marked interference with functioning, and were not due to another mental disorder.

Results In the final analysis, 1246 women who had had at least one menstrual cycle and were neither naturally nor surgically menopausal nor pregnant were selected. Of the women in the study, 1.3% met criteria for the diagnosis as defined in DSM-IV.

Conclusions The prevalence of PMDD is considerably lower than DSM-IV estimates and all but one of the estimates obtained from previous studies when all DSM-IV diagnostic criteria are considered. We suggest a new process for diagnosing PMDD based on our findings.

(Received June 12 2007)

(Revised February 18 2008)

(Accepted February 19 2008)

Key Words: Premenstrual dysphoric disorder; prevalence

Correspondence:

c1 Address for correspondence: S. Gehlert, Ph.D., School of Social Service Administration, The University of Chicago, 969 East Sixtieth Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. (Email: sgehlert@uchicago.edu)


back to top
Cambridge University Press