Two-dimensional flow past a cylinder close to a free surface at a Reynolds number of 180 is numerically investigated. The wake behaviour for Froude numbers between 0.0 and 0.7 and for gap ratios between 0.1 and 5.0 is examined. For low Froude numbers, where the surface deformation is minimal, the simulations reveal that this problem shares many features in common with flow past a cylinder close to a no-slip wall. This suggests that the flow is largely governed by geometrical constraints in the low-Froude-number limit.

At Froude numbers in excess of 0.3–0.4, surface deformation becomes substantial. This can be traced to increases in the local Froude number to unity or higher in the gap between the cylinder and the surface. In turn, this is associated with supercritical to subcritical transitions in the near wake resulting in localized free-surface sharpening and wave breaking. Since surface vorticity is directly related to surface curvature, such high surface deformation results in significant surface vorticity, which can diffuse and then convect into the main flow, altering the development of Strouhal vortices from the top shear layer, affecting wake skewness and suppressing the absolute instability. The variations of parameters such as Strouhal number and formation length are provided for Froude numbers spanning the critical range.

At larger Froude numbers, good agreement is obtained with recently published experimental investigations. The previously seen metastable wake states are observed to occur for similar system parameters to the experiments despite the difference in Reynolds numbers by a factor of about 40. The wake state switching appears to be controlled by a feedback loop. Important elements of the feedback loop include the cyclic generation and suppression of the absolute instability of the wake, and the role of surface vorticity and vortices formed from the bottom shear layer in controlling vortex formation from the top shear layer. The proposed mechanism is presented. Shedding ceases at very small gap ratios (${\sim}\, 0.1$–0.2). This behaviour can be explained in terms of the fluid flux through the gap, vorticity diffusion into the surface and opposite-signed surface vorticity from the strong surface deformation.