Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T14:11:42.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Orthoconic nautiloid cephalopod genera

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

C. H. Holland
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

Abstract

Use of the nautiloid cephalopod generic names Orthoceras and Michelinoceras is briefly reviewed. Two new genera, Imbricatoceras (upper Ordovician-Silurian) and Radnoroceras (Wenlock-Ludlow), are proposed for common taxa with distinctive ornamentation.

Type
Rapid Communication
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bassett, M. G., Cocks, L. R. M., Holland, C. H., Rickards, R. B. & Warren, P. T. 1975. The Type Wenlock Series. Report of the Institute of Geological Sciences No. 75/13, 19 pp.Google Scholar
Blake, J. F. 1882. A Monograph of the British Fossil Cephalopoda. Part 1. Introduction and Silurian Species. London, 248 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruguière, J. G. 1789. Histoire Naturelle des Vers, Vol. I, part 1. Encyclop. méthod. 6, Paris and Liège.Google Scholar
Flower, R. H. 1962. Notes on the Michelinoceratida. Memoirs of the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology 10, Part 2, 1942.Google Scholar
Foerste, A. F. 1932. Black River and Other Cephalopods from Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Ontario (Part 1). Journal of the Scientific Laboratories of Denison University 27, 47136.Google Scholar
Hewitt, R. A. & Watkins, R. 1980. Cephalopod ecology across a late Silurian shelf tract. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Abhandlungen 160, 96117.Google Scholar
Holland, C. H. 1967. Mollusca: Cephalopoda (Nautiloidea). In The Fossil Record (eds Harland, W. B. et al. ), pp. 431–43. London: Geological Society.Google Scholar
Holland, C. H. 1984. Form and function in Silurian Cephalopoda. In Autecology of Silurian organisms (eds Bassett, M. G. and Lawson, J. D.), pp. 151–64. Special Papers in Palaeontology no. 32.Google Scholar
Holland, C. H., Lawson, J. D. & Walmsley, V. G. 1963. The Silurian rocks of the Ludlow District, Shropshire. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology 8, 93171.Google Scholar
M'Coy, F. 1844. A synopsis of the characters of the Carboniferous limestone fossils of Ireland, 274 pp. pl. 1–29. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M'Coy, F. 1846. A Synopsis of the Silurian Fossils of Ireland. Dublin, 72 pp.Google Scholar
Melville, R. V. 1959. Proposed use of the plenary powers to suppress the generic names Orthoceras Brünnich, 1771, and Orthocera Modeer, 1789, so as to stabilise the generic name Orthoceras Bruguère, 1789 (Class Cephalopoda, Order Nautiloidea). Z.N. (S.). 44. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 17, 924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melville, R. V. 1970. The generic name Orthoceras Bruguière, 1789 (Class Cephalopoda). Z.N. (S.) 44. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 27, 180–93.Google Scholar
Miller, A. K., Dunbar, C. O. & Condra, G. E. 1933. The Nautiloid Cephalopods of the Pennsylvanian System in the Mid-Continent Region. Bulletin of the Nebraska Geological Survey, no. 9, 240 pp.Google Scholar
Murchison, R. I. 1839. The Silurian System. London, 768 pp.Google Scholar
Portlock, J. E. 1843. Report on the Geology of the County of Londonderry and of parts of Tyrone and Fermanagh. Dublin, 784 pp.Google Scholar
Schlotheim, E. F. Von. 1820. Die Petrefactenkunde. Gotha.Google Scholar
Sweet, W. C. 1964. Nautiloidea–Orthocerida. In Treatise on Invertebrate Paleonotology. Part K: Mollusca 3 (ed. Moore, R. J.), pp. K216–K261. Geological Society of American and Kansas University Press.Google Scholar
Teichert, C. & Miller, A. K. 1936. What is Orthoceras? American Journal of Science 31, 352–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar