Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T05:22:36.854Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multistrata Agroforestry with Beans, Bananas and Grevillea robusta in the Highlands of Burundi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 1999

E. AKYEAMPONG
Affiliation:
International Centre for Research in Agroforestry (ICRAF), PO Box 30677, Nairobi, Kenya
L. HITIMANA
Affiliation:
Institut des Sciences Agronomiques du Burundi (ISABU), BP 795, Bujumbura, Burundi
E. TORQUEBIAU
Affiliation:
International Centre for Development Oriented Research in Agriculture, Agropolis International, Avenue Agropolis, 34394 Montpellier CX5, France
P. C. MUNYEMANA
Affiliation:
Institut de Recherche Agronomique et Zootechnique (IRAZ), BP 91, Gitega, Burundi

Abstract

Some agronomic, economic and ecological aspects of an agroforestry system combining Grevillea robusta trees, bananas (Musa spp.) and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) were studied in the subhumid highlands of Burundi. Three densities of G. robusta, 208, 313 and 625  trees  ha−1 were interplanted in plots of bananas, beans and a banana–bean mixture. When G. robusta was interplanted with bananas, the tree had a positive effect on banana yield with maximum yield occurring at 300  trees  ha−1. In the presence of beans, banana yield was not influenced by the densities of the tree. Under low fertility regimes, the yields of beans interplanted with G. robusta were equal to or greater than those of the no-tree plots. Maximum bean yields were observed at between 283 and 295  trees  ha−1, representing a 25–135% yield increase above the no-tree control. When soil fertility was raised by the application of fertilizers, bean yields declined with an increasing density of G. robusta. Three years after planting, the growth of G. robusta was not affected by tree density. Mean height and mean basal diameter were 7.1   m and 13.2   cm respectively. Below ground competition between beans on the one hand, and bananas or bananas and G. robusta on the other, was more important than competition for light. Compared with the crops alone treatments, cumulative net present values of tree plots improved from being negative in the first year to being positive in the third year. Net present value was highest in two of three instances when the density of G. robusta was 625  trees  ha−1. A multistrata arrangement of bananas and beans with G. robusta is viable for the low input agriculture system of the highlands of Burundi.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)