Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T19:00:41.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FACTORS INFLUENCING THE AGRONOMIC PERFORMANCE OF THE ADAPTED YAM MINISETT TECHNIQUE IN NIGERIA – PLANTING DATE AND GENDER OF THE FARMER

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2016

STEPHEN MORSE  and
NORA McNAMARA
STEPHEN MORSE*
Affiliation:
Centre for Environment and Sustainability (CES), University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK
NORA McNAMARA
Affiliation:
Missionary Sisters of the Holy Rosary, West Park Artane, Dublin 5, Ireland
*
§Corresponding author. Email: s.morse@surrey.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This paper describes the results of 3 year's data from farmers using the Adaptive Yam Minisett Technique (AYMT) to produce seed yams in Nigeria. A total of 30 sites were established each year between 2013 and 2015 in the Idah area (Kogi State) of Nigeria and 58 plots in the Amoke area (Benue State) in 2015. Each site had yam setts (80 to 100 g) untreated and treated with a pesticide ‘dip’ prior to planting and farmers (male and female) were free to select the variety and manage the sites as they wished. In line with previous research, the results suggest that treatment does increase the weight of tubers produced by a sett but not necessarily the number of tubers. Varietal differences were also observed. For the first time, the results suggest that the time of planting does have a significant impact on seed tuber weight, with later planting leading to small tubers. Also, the gender of the farmer had an impact on some of the agronomic variables, with male owners of the site generally producing more and larger tubers per sett planted and sprouted than female owners. Various mechanisms for the latter are discussed in the paper.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , February 2018 , pp. 1 - 15
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alamu, E. O., Maziya-Dixon, B., Okonkwo, C. C. and Asiedu, R. (2014). Physiochemical and bioactive properties of selected white yam (Dioscorea rotundata) varieties adapted to riverine areas of Nigeria. African Journal of Food Science 8 (7):402–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, M. N. and Hahn, S. K. (1984). Seed yam production. In Tropical root crops: Production and uses in Africa. Proceedings of the Second Triennial Symposium of the International Society for tropical Root Crops - Africa Branch. IDRC-221e, Ottawa, Canada, 129–132 (Eds Terry, E. R., Doku, E. V., Arene, O. B. and Mahungu, N. M.).Google Scholar
Asante, B. O., Otoo, E., Wiredu, A. N., Acheampong, P., Osei-Adu, J. and Nsiah-Frimpong, B. (2011). Willingness to adopt the vine multiplication technique in seed yam production in the forest savanna transition agro-ecological zone, Ghana. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics 3 (16):710–719.Google Scholar
Asiedu, R. and Sartie, A. (2010). Crops that feed the world 1. Yams. Yams for income and food security. Food Security 2:305–315.Google Scholar
Baco, M. N., Biaou, G., Pham, J. L. and Lescure, J. P. (2008). Geographical and social factors of cultivated yam diversity in northern Benin. Cahiers Agricultures 17 (2):172–177.Google Scholar
Dansi, A., Mignouna, H. D., Zoundjihekpon, J., Sangare, A., Asiedu, R. and Quin, F. M. (1998). Varietal identification key of the cultivated yams (Dioscorea cayenensis-Dioscorea rotundata complex) of Benin Republic. Plant Genetic Research Newsletter 116:18–25.Google Scholar
Hahn, S. K., Osiru, D. S. O., Akorada, M. O. and Otoo, J. A. (1987). Yam Production and its future prospects. Outlook on Agriculture 16:105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, N., Morse, S., Ugbe, U. P., Coyne, D. and Claudius-Cole, A. (2012). Facilitating healthy seed yam entrepreneurship in the Niger River system in Nigeria: The value of ‘Research Into Use’. Outlook on Agriculture 41 (4):257–263.Google Scholar
Mignouna, D. B., Akinola, A. A., Suleman, I., Nweke, F. and Abdoulaye, T. (2014). Yam: A cash crop in West Africa. YIIFSWA Working Paper Series No. 3, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture. Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Morse, S. and McNamara, N. (2015). The Adapted Yam Minisett Technique for producing clean seed yams (Dioscorea rotundata): Agronomic performance and varietal differences under farmer-managed conditions in Nigeria. Experimental Agriculture 51 (3):467–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, S. and McNamara, N. (2016). Impact of the Adapted Yam Minisett Technique on ware yam (Dioscorea rotundata) production under farmer-managed conditions in Nigeria. Experimental Agriculture. Epublished ahead of print. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0014479716000120.Google Scholar
Morse, S., McNamara, N. and Acholo, M. (2009). Potential for clean seed yam minisett production by resource-poor farmers in the middle-belt of Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Science 147 (5):589–600.Google Scholar
Muzac-Tucker, I., Asemota, H. and Ahmad, H. M. (1993). Biochemical composition and storage of Jamaican yams (Dioscorea spp). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 62:219–224.Google Scholar
Ogbonna, M. C., Anyaegbunam, H. N. and Asumugha, G. N. (2011a). Price response analysis of yam tubers in South Eastern Nigeria: Evidence from Two Major Markets in Abia State. Journal of Farm Management of Nigeria 12 (2):34–40.Google Scholar
Ogbonna, M. C., Korieocha, D. S., Onyenobi, V. O. and Njoku, S. C. (2011b). Profitability of minituber seed yam production technique in south east agro-ecological zone: Evidence from Abia state, Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Social Research 11 (2):113–119.Google Scholar
Okeke, E. C., Eneobong, H. N., Uzuegbunam, A. O., Ozioko, A. O. and Kuhnlein, H. (2008). Igbo traditional food system: Documentation, uses and research needs. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 7 (2):365–376.Google Scholar
Okeke, D. C., Okeke, C. C. and Udeora, S. N. (2013). Socio-economic determinants of seed yam production in oyi local government area of anambra state. Asian Economic and Social Society 3 (3):148–153.Google Scholar
Okelola, O. E., Ariyo, O. C., Ume, S. I., Anozie, R. O. and Olowoyo, B. F. (2014). Economics analysis of yam production in Ikwo local government area of Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Taraba Journal of Agricultural Research 2 (1):10–13.Google Scholar
Omojola, J. T. (2014). A comparative analysis of upland and wetland yam production in Southwest, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural and Crop Research 2 (7):126–133.Google Scholar
Otoo, J. A., Osiru, D. S. O., Ng, S. Y. and Hahn, S. K. (1987). Improved technology for seed yam production. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Scarcelli, N., Tostain, S., Mariac, C., Agbangle, C., Da, O, Berthaud, J. and Pham, J. L. (2006). Genetic nature of yams (Dioscorea sp.) domesticated by farmers in Benin (West Africa). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 53 (1):121–130.Google Scholar
Shehu, J. F., Iyortyer, J. T., Mshelia, S. I. and Jongur, A. A. U. (2010). Determinants of yam production and technical efficiency among yam farmers in benue state, Nigeria. Journal of Social Science 24 (2):143–148.Google Scholar
Vernier, P., Orkwor, G. C. and Dossou, A. R. (2003). Studies on yam domestication and farmers’ practices in Benin and Nigeria. Outlook on Agriculture 32 (1):35–41.Google Scholar
Verter, N. and Becvarova, V. (2014). Yam production as pillar of food security in logo local government area of benue state, Nigeria. European Scientific Journal 10 (31):27–42.Google Scholar
Zannou, A., Ahanchede, A., Struik, P. C., Richards, P., Zoundjihekpon, J., Tossou, R. and Vodouhe, S. (2004). Yam and cowpea diversity management by farmers in the Guinea-Sudan transition zone of Benin. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 52 (3–4):393–420.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Image

Morse and McNamara supplementary material S1

Supplementary Figure

Download Morse and McNamara supplementary material S1(Image)
Image 78.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Morse and McNamara supplementary material S2

Supplementary Table

Download Morse and McNamara supplementary material S2(File)
File 14.6 KB