Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:52:06.385Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A multilevel branching model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

D. A. Dawson  and
K. J. Hochberg
D. A. Dawson*
Affiliation:
Carleton University
K. J. Hochberg*
Affiliation:
Bar-Ilan University
*
∗Postal address: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada K1S 5B6.
∗∗Postal address: Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Bar-Ilan University, 52900 Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We consider a dynamic multilevel population or information system. At each level individuals or information units undergo a Galton–Watson-type branching process in which they can be replicated or removed. In addition, a collection of individuals or information units at a given level constitutes an information unit at the next higher level. Each collection of units also undergoes a Galton–Watson branching process, either dying or replicating. In this paper, we represent this multilevel branching model as a measure-valued stochastic process, study its moment structure, identify the limiting continuous-state approximation and analyse the long-time behavior in both non-critical and critical cases. For example, we obtain an asymptotic expression for the extinction probability for the total population mass process and an analogue of Yaglom's conditioned limit theorem in the critical case.

Keywords

MEASURE-VALUED PROCESSMOMENT MEASURESEXTINCTION PROBABILITYCONDITIONAL LIMIT LAW
Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in Applied Probability , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , December 1991 , pp. 701 - 715
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1991 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Research partially supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada grant.

Research partially supported by US National Security Agency grant MDA 904-88-H-2044 and US National Science Foundation grant DMS-8800289.

References

Athreya, K. B. and Ney, P. E. (1977) Branching Processes. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Bunimovich, L. (1975) A model of human population with hierarchical structure. Soviet Genetics 11, 134–143.Google Scholar
Carmelli, D. and Cavalli-Sforza, L. (1976) Some models of population structure and evolution. Theoret. Popn Biol. 9, 329–359.Google Scholar
Dawson, D. A. and Hochberg, K. J. (1979) The carrying dimension of a stochastic measure diffusion. Ann. Prob. 7, 693–703.Google Scholar
Durrett, R. (1978) The genealogy of critical branching processes. Stoch. Proc. Appl. 8, 101–116.Google Scholar
Dynkin, E. B. (1989) Superprocesses and their linear additive functionals. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 314, 255–282.Google Scholar
Dynkin, E. B. (1989) Regular transition functions and regular superprocesses. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 316, 623–634.Google Scholar
Ethier, S. N. and Kurtz, T. G. (1986) Markov Processes: Characterization and Convergence . Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Fitzsimmons, P. J. (1988) Construction and regularity of measure-valued Markov branching processes. Israel J. Math. 64, 337–361.Google Scholar
Sawyer, S. and Felsenstein, J. (1983) Isolation by distance in a hierarchically clustered population. J. Appl. Prob. 20, 1–10.Google Scholar
Shiryayev, N. (1984) Probability. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Wu, Y. (1990) Dynamic Particle Systems and Multilevel Measure Branching Processes. Thesis, Carleton University.Google Scholar