Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:24:25.774Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Biological effects of locomotor play: getting into shape, or something more specific?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2009

Marc Bekoff
Affiliation:
University of Colorado, Boulder
John A. Byers
Affiliation:
University of Idaho
Get access

Summary

Moving the skeleton is an engineer's nightmare.

(Thach 1996, p. 415)

Arnold Schwarzenegger shows us one side of the profound plasticity of the vertebrate muscular–skeletal system. Muscles become larger and bones appropriately remodeled when they experience increased work loads. Parenthetically, although Mr. Schwarzenegger has not been called upon to go topless in his recent films, his continuing apparent bulk under a sports jacket shows that use-specific hypertrophy is not confined to a narrow age range. I shall return to this point later. The anti-Arnold effect, or disuse-specific atrophy, also is well known. It is strikingly illustrated by the rapid loss of muscle and bone mass that occurs in zero gravity. Mammals, including humans, that spend a few days in earth orbit return with substantial reduction in muscle and bone mass (Bodine-Fowler et al. 1992; Cann & Adachi 1983; Morey & Baylink 1978). NASA acknowledges that muscular–skeletal atrophy is the most serious medical problem associated with space flight. Another well-known plastic response in vertebrates is the use-induced gain and disuse-induced loss of aerobic capacity. Here, changes in many organ and enzyme systems are involved (Close 1972; Laughlin et al. 1989; Nieman 1990; Bigard et al. 1991), and the effects are equally as dramatic as Mr. Schwarzenegger's pectoralis muscles. I and most other humans cannot run a single 5 minute mile, but some humans who have trained for marathons can run 26 of these in succession.

Phenotypic plasticity in systems that support strength and endurance is adaptive. The muscular–skeletal system has a way of detecting demands placed upon it, and responds appropriately, building as much, but no more, capability as is called for.

Type
Chapter
Information
Animal Play
Evolutionary, Comparative and Ecological Perspectives
, pp. 205 - 220
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×