Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-94d59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T00:23:18.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Innovation as the principal source of growth in the global economy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2009

Daniele Archibugi
Affiliation:
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Rome
Jeremy Howells
Affiliation:
PREST, University of Manchester
Jonathan Michie
Affiliation:
Birkbeck College, University of London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

I will divide my discussion into three sections. First, I will explain why innovation matters to the growth and competitiveness of firms and wider economies, and to the trade balances of national economies. I argue that with globalisation, innovation is exercising a steadily increasing influence upon economic performance. I advance this argument in the context of two very different perspectives on profits and economic growth, each of which can be found in the extensive historical literature on these issues.

Second, I deal with a possible counter-argument, which says that in a global world the rewards from innovation cannot be kept by the originators within national boundaries, and therefore it becomes less important as a source of profits and growth. This is known in the literature as the ‘appropriability’ argument – the view that it is difficult for innovating firms or countries to appropriate a full return on their investments in innovation. I show instead how, in the light of a newly emerging consensus among economists about the nature of technological change (a consensus especially, although not exclusively, among non-neoclassical economists), the appropriability argument has been overplayed, and need not be of undue concern.

Third, I contend that national systems of innovation and states continue to have an important role to play in a global economy. Far from collapsing with globalisation (as some writers have imagined), national systems of innovation have been consolidated, and I explain why. There is also a role for policy support for innovation by national states, despite the fact that the justification for that policy cannot rest entirely on the appropriability argument, as it has done traditionally in the economics literature since about 1960.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×