Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:33:24.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - Whether our levers are long enough and the fulcrum strong? Exploring the soft underbelly of adaptation decisions and actions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2009

W. Neil Adger
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Irene Lorenzoni
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Karen L. O'Brien
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo
Get access

Summary

Give me a lever long enough,

and a fulcrum on which to place it,

and I shall move the world.

Archimedes (287 BC – c. 212 BC)

Introduction

Much of the focus in social science adaptation research in the climate and global change arena to date has focused on the international policy framework, national-level to place-based strategies in general, technological options and specific adaptation actions that can be employed by actors at any level of decision-making. By far the strongest emphasis has been on what potentially could be done, whether the necessary capacity for adaptation is in place, and – if wanting – how to enhance it (Smit et al., 2001; Adger et al., 2007). A much smaller number of investigators has looked at historical examples of successful or failed adaptation (from the cultural to local levels). Only in the last few years has there been a growing interest in the degree to which adaptation to anthropogenic climate change is already occurring, and if not, why not (see Adger et al., 2007). This line of work in particular, together with critical analyses of the socio-economic and political power dynamics and inequity issues underlying vulnerability and adaptive capacity (for example Adger et al., 2001, 2006) has brought us to the serious investigation of barriers and limits to adaptation that is the focus of this book and the conference preceding it.

Type
Chapter
Information
Adapting to Climate Change
Thresholds, Values, Governance
, pp. 313 - 334
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adger, W. N., Benjaminson, T. A., Brown, K. and Svarstad, H. 2001. ‘Advancing a political ecology of global environmental discourses’, Development and Change 32: 681–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adger, W. N., Brown, K., Fairbrass, J., Jordan, A., Paavola, J., Rosendo, S. and Seyfang, G. 2003. ‘Governance for sustainability: towards a ‘thick’ analysis of environmental decision-making’, Environment and Planning A 35: 1095–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adger, W. N., Arnell, N. W. and Tompkins, E. L. 2005a. ‘Successful adaptation to climate change across scales’, Global Environmental Change 15: 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adger, W. N., Brown, K. and Tompkins, E. L. 2005b. ‘The political economy of cross-scale networks in resource co-management’, Ecology and Society 10: 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adger, W. N., Paavola, J., Huq, S. and Mace, M. J. (eds.) 2006. Fairness in Adaptation to Climate Change. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Adger, W. N., Agrawala, S., Mirza, M. M. Q., Conde, C., O'Brien, K., Pulhin, J., Pulwarty, R., Smit, B. and Takahashi, K. 2007. ‘Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity’, in Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., Linden, V. J. and Hanson, C. E. (eds.) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 717–743.Google Scholar
Adger, W. N., Dessai, S., Goulden, M., Hulme, M., Lorenzoni, I., Nelson, D., Naess, L.-O., Wolf, J. and Wreford, A. 2009. ‘Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change?’, Climatic Change 93: 335–354.CrossRef
Anderies, J. M., Janssen, M. A. and Ostrom, E. 2004. ‘A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective’, Ecology and Society 9: 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arvai, J., Bridge, G., Dolsak, N., Franzese, R., Koontz, T., Korfmacher, K. S., Sohngen, B., Tansey, J. and Thompson, A. 2006. ‘Adaptive management of the global climate problem: bridging the gap between climate research and climate policy’, Climatic Change 78: 217–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, A. and Peters, B. G. (eds.) 1993. The Politics of Expert Advice: Creating, Using and Manipulating Scientific Knowledge for Public Policy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Beierle, T. C. 1998. Public Participation in Environmental Decisions: An Evaluation Framework Using Social Goals, Discussion Paper No. 99–06. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Berkes, F. 2002. ‘Cross-scale institutional linkages for commons management: perspectives from the bottom up’, in Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., Stern, P., Stonich, S. and Weber, E. (eds.) The Drama of the Commons. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, pp. 293–321.Google Scholar
Bouwer, L. M. and Aerts, J. C. J. H. 2006. ‘Financing climate change adaptation’, Disasters 30: 49–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradshaw, G. A. and Borchers, J. G. 2000. ‘Uncertainty as information: narrowing the science–policy gap’, Conservation Ecology 4: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cash, D. W. and Moser, S. C. 2000. ‘Linking local and global scales: designing dynamic assessment and management processes’, Global Environmental Change 10: 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cash, D. W., Clark, W. C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N. M., Eckley, N., Guston, D. H., Jäger, J. and Mitchell, R. B. 2003. ‘Knowledge systems for sustainable development’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 100: 8086–8091.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cash, D. W., Adger, W. N., Berkes, F., Garden, P., Lebel, L., Olsson, P., Pritchard, L. and Young, O. 2006. ‘Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world’, Ecology and Society 11: 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. (eds.) 2001. Participation: The New Tyranny?London: Zed Books.
Cox, K. 1998. ‘Representation and power in the politics of scale’, Political Geography 17: 41–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, G. S., Cumming, D. H. M. and Redman, C. L. 2006. ‘Scale mismatches in social-ecological systems: causes, consequences, and solutions’, Ecology and Society 11: 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cvetkovich, G., Siegrist, M., Murray, R. and Tragesser, S. 2002. ‘New information and social trust: asymmetry and perseverance of attributions about hazard managers’, Risk Analysis 22: 359–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dessai, S. and Hulme, M. 2007. ‘Assessing the robustness of adaptation decisions to climate change uncertainties: a case study on water resources management in the East of England’, Global Environmental Change 17: 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, P. S., Watts, D. J. and Sabel, C. F. 2003. ‘Information exchange and the robustness of organizational networks’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 100: 12 516–12 521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Easterling, W. E., Hurd, B. H. and Smith, J. B. 2004. Coping with Climate Change: The Role of Adaptation in the United States. Arlington: Pew Center on Global Climate Change.Google Scholar
Edwards, V. M. and Steins, N. A. 1999. ‘A framework for analysing contextual factors in common pool resource research’, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 1: 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Few, R., Brown, K. and Tompkins, E. L. 2004. Scaling Adaptation: Climate Change Response and Coastal Management in the UK, Tyndall Centre Working Paper No. 60. Norwich: Tyndall Centre, University of East Anglia.Google Scholar
Few, R., Brown, K. and Tompkins, E. L. 2006. Public Participation and Climate Change Adaptation, Tyndall Centre Working Paper No. 95. Norwich: Tyndall Centre, University of East Anglia.Google Scholar
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P. and Norberg, J. 2005. ‘Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems’, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30: 441–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, S. and Geldermann, J. 2005. ‘The varied contexts of environmental decision problems and their implications for decision support’, Environmental Science and Policy 8: 378–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funtowicz, S. O. and Ravetz, J. R. 1993. ‘Science for the post-normal age’, Futures 25: 739–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunderson, L. H., Holling, C. S. and Light, S. S. (eds.) 1995. Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hickey, S., and Mohan, G. (eds.) 2005. Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation? Exploring New Approaches to Participation in Development. London: Zed Books.
Humphreys, M. 2005. ‘Natural resources, conflict, and conflict resolution: uncovering the mechanisms’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 49: 508–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huq, S., Rahman, A. M., Konate, M., Sokona, Y. and Reid, H. 2003. Mainstreaming Adaptation to Climate Change in Least Developed Countries (LDCs). New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Jacobs, K., Garfin, G. and Lenart, M. 2005. ‘More than just talk: connecting science and decisionmaking’, Environment 47: 6–21.Google Scholar
Janssen, M. A. and Anderies, J. M. 2007. ‘Robustness-tradeoffs for social-ecological systems’, International Journal of the Commons 1: 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jentoft, S. 2005. ‘Fisheries co-management as empowerment’, Marine Policy 29: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, S. A., Fischhoff, B. and Lach, D. 1999. ‘Evaluating the science–policy interface for climate change research’, Climatic Change 43: 581–599.Google Scholar
Kelly, P. M. and Adger, W. N. 2000. ‘Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation’, Climatic Change 47: 325–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, M., Brooks, C. and Gleick, P. H. 2006. ‘Do regional disparities in research on climate and water influence adaptive capacity?’, Climatic Change 77: 363–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, R. J. T., Eriksen, S. E. H., Næss, L. O., Hammill, A., Robledo, C., O'Brien, K. L. and Tanner, T. M. 2007. ‘Portfolio screening to support the mainstreaming of adaptation to climate change into development assistance’, Climatic Change 84: 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, R. J. T., Schipper, E. L. F. and Dessai, S. 2005. ‘Integrating mitigation and adaptation into climate and development policy: three research questions’, Environmental Science and Policy 8: 579–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, M., Mearns, R. and Scoones, I. 1999. ‘Environmental entitlements: dynamics and institutions in community-based natural resource management’, World Development 27: 227–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebel, L., Garden, P. and Imamura, M. 2005. ‘The politics of scale, position, and place in the governance of water resources in the Mekong Region’, Ecology and Society 10: 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, K. N. 1993. Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Lee, K. 1995. ‘Greed, scale mismatch, and learning’, Ecological Applications 3: 560–564.Google Scholar
Lempert, R. J., Popper, S. W. and Bankes, S. C. 2003. Shaping the Next One Hundred Years: New Methods for Quantitative, Long-Term Policy Analysis. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. 2005. ‘Scale, sovereignty, and strategy in environmental governance’, Antipode 37: 731–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNie, E. C. 2007. ‘Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature’, Environmental Science and Policy 10: 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morss, R. E., Wilhelmi, O. V., Downton, M. W. and Gruntfest, E. 2005. ‘Flood risk, uncertainty, and scientific information for decision making: lessons from an interdisciplinary project’, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 86: 1593–1601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, S. C. 2005. ‘Impact assessments and policy responses to sea-level rise in three US states: an exploration of human-dimension uncertainties,’ Global Environmental Change 15: 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, S. C. 2006. ‘Climate change and sea-level rise in Maine and Hawai'i: the changing tides of an issue domain’, in Mitchell, R. B., Clark, W. C., Cash, D. W. and Dickson, N. (eds.) Global Environmental Assessments: Information, Institutions, and Influence. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 201–239.Google Scholar
Moser, S. C. 2008. ‘A new charge: engaging at the science–practice interface’, IHDP Update 1: 18–21.Google Scholar
Moser, S. C. and Dilling, L. 2004. ‘Making climate hot: communicating the urgency and challenge of global climate change’, Environment 46: 32–46.Google Scholar
Moser, S. C. and Dilling, L. 2007a. ‘Toward the social tipping point: Conclusions’, in Moser, S. C. and Dilling, L. (eds.) Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 491–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, S. C. and Dilling, L. (eds.) 2007b. Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Moser, S. C. and Luers, A. L. 2008. ‘Managing climate risks in California: the need to engage resource managers for successful adaptation to change’, Climatic Change 87: 309–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, S. C. and Tribbia, J. 2006/2007. ‘Vulnerability to inundation and climate change impacts in California: coastal managers’ attitudes and perceptions', Marine Technology Society Journal 40: 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, S. C., Kasperson, R. E., Yohe, G. and Agyeman, J. 2008. ‘Adaptation to climate change in the Northeast United States: opportunities, processes, constraints’, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 13(5–6): 643–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, R. H. 2007. ‘Improving information for managing an uncertain future climate’, Global Environmental Change 17: 4–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mote, P. W., Parson, E. A., Hamlet, A. F., Keeton, W. S., Lettenmaier, D., Mantua, N., Miles, E. L., Peterson, D. W., Peterson, D. L., Slaughter, R. and Snover, A. K. 2003. ‘Preparing for climatic change: the water, salmon, and forests of the Pacific Northwest’, Climatic Change 61: 45–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naess, L. O., Bang, G., Eriksen, S. and Vevatne, J. 2005. ‘Institutional adaptation to climate change: flood responses at the municipal level in Norway’, Global Environmental Change 15: 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,National Council for Science, and the Environment. 2000. Recommendations for Improving the Scientific Basis for Environmental Decisionmaking: A Report from the First National Conference on Science, Policy, and the Environment. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
,National Research Council (NRC) 1996. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
,National Research Council (NRC) 2009. Informing Decisions in a Changing Climate. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
O'Brien, K. L., Eriksen, S., Sygna, L. and Naess, L. O. 2006. ‘Questioning complacency: climate change impacts, vulnerability, and adaptation in Norway’, Ambio 35: 50–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patt, A. 2007. ‘Assessing model-based and conflict-based uncertainty’, Global Environmental Change 17: 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelling, M. 1998. ‘Participation, social capital and vulnerability to urban flooding in Guyana’, Journal of International Development 10: 469–486.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pielke, R. A., Prins, G., Rayner, S. and Sarewitz, D. 2007. ‘Lifting the taboo on adaptation’, Nature 445: 597–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poortinga, W. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2004. ‘Trust, the asymmetry principle, and the role of prior beliefs’, Risk Analysis 24: 1475–1486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pulwarty, R. S. and Redmond, K. 1997. ‘Climate and salmon restoration in the Columbia River basin: the role and usability of seasonal forecasts’, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 78: 381–397.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulwarty, R. S. 2003. ‘Climate and water in the West: science, information and decision-making’, Water Resources Update 124: 4–12.Google Scholar
Pulwarty, R. S. and Melis, T. S. 2001. ‘Climate extremes and adaptive management on the Colorado River: lessons from the 1997–1998 ENSO event’, Journal of Environmental Management 63: 307–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ravetz, J. 2004. ‘The post-normal science of precaution’, Futures 36: 347–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayner, S., Lach, D. and Ingram, H. 2005. ‘Weather forecasts are for wimps: why water resource managers do not use climate forecasts’, Climatic Change 69: 197–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichert, P. and Borsuk, M. E. 2005. ‘Does high forecast uncertainty preclude effective decision support?’, Environmental Modeling and Software 20: 991–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, T. 2005. ‘Environmental assessment and planning theory: four short stories about power, multiple rationality, and ethics’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25: 341–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risbey, J., Kandlikar, M., Dowlatabadi, H. and Graetz, D. 1999. ‘Scale, context, and decision making in agricultural adaptation to climate variability and change’, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 4: 137–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, G. and Frewer, L. J. 2000. ‘Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation’, Science, Technology and Human Values 25: 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarewitz, D. 2004. ‘How science makes environmental controversies worse’, Environmental Science and Policy 7: 385–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidaway, R. 2005. Resolving Environmental Disputes: From Conflict to Consensus. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Slovic, P. 1993. ‘Perceived risk, trust, and democracy’, Risk Analysis 13: 675–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smit, B., Pilifosova, O., Burton, I., Challenger, B., Huq, S., Klein, R. J. T. and Yohe, G. 2001. ‘Adaptation to climate change in the context of sustainable development and equity’, in MacCarthy, J. J., Canziani, O. F., Leary, N. A., Dokken, D. J. and White, K. S. (eds.) Climate change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 877–912.Google Scholar
Tompkins, E. L. and Adger, W. N. 2004. ‘Does adaptive management of natural resources enhance resilience to climate change?’, Ecology and Society 9: 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tribbia, J. and Moser, S. C. 2008. ‘More than information: what coastal managers need to plan for climate change’, Environmental Science and Policy 11: 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, C., Moser, S. C., Kasperson, R. E. and Dabelko, G. 2007. ‘Linking vulnerability, adaptation and resilience science to practice: players, pathways and partnerships’, Global Environmental Change 17: 349–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yohe, G. and Tol, R. 2002. ‘Indicators for social and economic coping capacity: moving toward a working definition of adaptive capacity’, Global Environmental Change 12: 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, A. 2007. ‘Forming networks, enabling leaders, financing action: the Cities for Climate Protection campaign’, in Moser, S. C. and Dilling, L. (eds.) Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 383–398.
Young, O. R. 2002. ‘Institutional interplay: the environmental consequences of cross-scale interactions’, in Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., Stern, P., Stonich, S. and Weber, E. (eds.) Drama of the Commons. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, pp. 263–292.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×