Abbott, Kenneth W. and Snidal, Duncan 2000. ‘Hard and soft law in international governance’. International Organization 54(3): 421–456.Google Scholar

Axworthy, Lloyd 2001. ‘Human security and global governance: Putting people first’. Global Governance 7(1): 19–23.Google Scholar

Barnett, Michael N. and Finnemore, Martha 2004. Rules for the World. International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Beetham, David 1991. The Legitimation of Power. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press International.Google Scholar

Bennett, Andrew and Checkel, Jeffrey T. (eds.) 2015. Process Tracing in the Social Sciences: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal and Downs, George W. 2009. ‘National courts, domestic democracy, and the evolution of international law’. European Journal of International Law 20(1): 59–72.Google Scholar

Binder, Martin and Heupel, Monika (2015). ‘The legitimacy of the UN Security Council: Evidence from recent General Assembly debates’. International Studies Quarterly 59(2): 238–250.Google Scholar

Bodansky, Daniel 1999. ‘The legitimacy of international governance: A coming challenge for international environmental law’. American Journal of International Law 93(3): 596–624.Google Scholar

Bodansky, Daniel 2013. ‘Legitimacy in international law and international relations’, in Dunoff, and Pollack, (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations. The State of the Art. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 321–341.Google Scholar

Börzel, Tanja A. and Risse, Thomas 2012. ‘From Europeanisation to diffusion: Introduction’. West European Politics 35(1):1–19.Google Scholar

Brittain, Victoria and Watkins, Kevin 1994. ‘A continent driven to economic suicide’. The Guardian, 20 July 1994.Google Scholar

Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2006. ‘Tracing causal mechanisms’. International Studies Review 8(2): 362–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Claude, Inis L. 1964. Swords into Plowshares: The Problems and Progress of International Organization. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Coleman, James S. 1986. ‘Social theory, social research, and a theory of action’. American Journal of Sociology 91(6): 1309–1335.Google Scholar

Cooper, Andrew F. 2002. ‘Like-minded nations, NGOs and the changing pattern of diplomacy within the UN system: An introductory perspective’, in Cooper, , English, and Thakur, (eds.), Enhancing Global Governance: Towards a New Diplomacy? Tokyo: United Nations University Press, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar

Cooper, Scott, Hawkins, Darren G., Jacoby, Wade and Nielson, Daniel 2008. ‘Yielding sovereignty to international institutions: Bringing system structure back in’. International Studies Review 10(3): 501–524.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dai, Xinyuan 2014. ‘The conditional effects of international human rights institutions’. Human Rights Quarterly 36(3): 569–589.Google Scholar

De Wilde, Pieter and Zürn, Michael 2012. ‘Can the politicization of European integration be reversed?’. Journal of Common Market Studies 50(1): 137–153.Google Scholar

Deitelhoff, Nicole 2009. ‘The discursive process of legalization: Charting islands of persuasion in the ICC case’. International Organization 63(1): 33–65.Google Scholar

Drezner, Daniel W. 2011. ‘Sanctions sometimes smart: Targeted sanctions in theory and practice’. International Studies Review 13(1): 96–108.Google Scholar

Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Trachtman, Joel P. (eds.) 2009. Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elliott, Michael A. 2007. ‘Human rights and the triumph of the individual in world culture’. Cultural Sociology 1(3): 343–363.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon 1995. ‘Strategic uses of arguments’, in Arrow, , Mnookin, , Ross, and Tversky, (eds.), Barriers to Conflict Resolution. New York: W.W. Norton, pp. 236–257.Google Scholar

Fehl, Caroline 2004. ‘Explaining the International Criminal Court: A “praxis test” for rationalist and constructivist approaches’. European Journal of International Relations 10(3): 357–394.Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha 1999. ‘Rules of war and war of rules: The International Red Cross and the restraint of state violence’, in Boli, and Thomas, (eds.), Constructing World Culture. International Nongovernmental Organizations since 1875. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 149–168.Google Scholar

Fioretos, Orfeo 2011. ‘Historical institutionalism in international relations’. International Organization 65(2): 367–399.Google Scholar

Forst, Rainer 2007. Das Recht auf Rechtfertigung. Elemente einer konstruktivistischen Theorie der Gerechtigkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Fox, Jonathan A. and Brown, L. David (1998). ‘Introduction’, in Fox, and Brown, (eds.), The Struggle for Accountability: The World Bank, NGOs, and Grassroots Movements. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–48.Google Scholar

Gehring, Thomas and Oberthür, Sebastian 2009. ‘The causal mechanisms of interaction between international institutions’. European Journal of International Relations 15(1): 125–156.Google Scholar

George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Gerring, John 2008. ‘The mechanismic worldview: Thinking inside the box’. British Journal of Political Science 38(1): 161–179.Google Scholar

Gilpin, Robert 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Grande, Edgar and Pauly, Louis W. (eds.) 2005. Complex Sovereignty: Reconstituting Political Authority in the Twenty-first Century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Greif, Avner and Laitin, David D. 2004. ‘A theory of endogenous institutional change’. American Political Science Review 98(4): 633–652.Google Scholar

Gutner, Tamar and Thompson, Alexander 2010. ‘The politics of IO performance: A framework’. The Review of International Organizations 5(3): 227–248.Google Scholar

Hasenclever, Andreas 2001. Die Macht der Moral in der internationalen Politik. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar

Hedström, Peter and Ylikoski, Petri 2010. ‘Causal mechanisms in the social sciences’. Annual Review of Sociology 36: 49–67.Google Scholar

Held, David 1995. Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Heupel, Monika 2013. ‘With power comes responsibility: Human rights protection in United Nations sanctions policy’. European Journal of International Relations 19(4): 771–795.Google Scholar

Heupel, Monika, Hirschmann, Gisela and Zürn, Michael 2015. ‘Internationale Organisationen und der Schutz der Menschenrechte’, in da Conceição-Heldt, , Koch, and Liese, (eds.), Internationale Organisationen: Autonomie, Politisierung, interorganisationale Beziehungen und Wandel, special issue, Politische Vierteljahresschrift 49: 423–451.Google Scholar

Hooghe, Liesbet and Marks, Gary 2009. ‘A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus’. British Journal of Political Science 39(1): 1–23.Google Scholar

Hooghe, Liesbet and Marks, Gary 2014. ‘The Authority of International Organizations: The Effects of Scope and Scale’. Paper presented at the 55th Annual Convention of the ISA, Toronto, 26–29 March. www.unc.edu/~gwmarks/assets/doc/hooghe,%20marks%20-%20authority%20of%20IOs_pooling%20and%20delegation.pdf (16 October 2015).Google Scholar

Hovi, Jon 2004. ‘Causal mechanisms and the study of international environmental regimes’, in Underdal, and Young, (eds.), Regime Consequences. Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 71–86.Google Scholar

Hurrell, Andrew 2007. On Global Order: Power, Values and the Constitution of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ikenberry, G. John 2011. ‘The future of the liberal world order. Internationalism after America’. Foreign Affairs 90(3): 56–68.Google Scholar

Jordan, Michael J. 2004. ‘Sex charges haunt UN forces’. Christian Science Monitor 26 November 2004. www.csmonitor.com/2004/1126/p06s02-wogi.html (15 October 2015).Google Scholar

Jupille, Joseph, Mattli, Walter and Snidal, Duncan 2013. Institutional Choice and Global Commerce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Keck, Margaret E. and Sikkink, Kathryn 1998. Activists beyond Borders. Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O. 1980. ‘The theory of hegemonic stability and changes in international economic regimes’, in George, , Holsti, and Siverson, (eds.), Change in the International System. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 131–162.Google Scholar

King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O. and Verba, Sidney 1994. Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, Krisch, Nico and Stewart, Richard B. 2005. ‘The emergence of global administrative law’. Law and Contemporary Problems 68(3): 15–61.Google Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert P. 1986. ‘Political opportunity structures and political protest: Anti-nuclear movements in four democracies’. British Journal of Political Science 16(1): 57–85.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan 2004. ‘Constitutionalism lite’. International Organizations Law Review 1(1): 31–58.Google Scholar

Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias 2011. ‘Is global democracy possible?’. European Journal of International Relations 17(3): 519–542.Google Scholar

Koh, Harold H. 2006. ‘Why transnational law matters’. Penn State International Law Review 24(4): 745–753.Google Scholar

Koopmans, Ruud 1999. ‘Political. Opportunity. Structure. Some splitting to balance the lumping’. Sociological Forum 14(1): 93–105.Google Scholar

Koremenos, Barbara 2013. ‘The continent of international law’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 57(4): 653–681.Google Scholar

Koremenos, Barbara and Betz, Timm 2013. ‘The design of dispute settlement procedures in international agreements’, in Dunoff, and Pollack, (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations. The State of the Art. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 371–393.Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen D. 1991. ‘Global communications and national power. Life on the Pareto frontier’. World Politics 43(3): 336–366.Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kumm, Mattias 2009. ‘The cosmopolitan turn in constitutionalism: On the relationship between constitutionalism in and beyond the state’, in Dunoff, and Trachtman, (eds.), Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 258–325.Google Scholar

Lenz, Tobias, Bezuijen, Jeanine, Hooghe, Liesbet and Marks, Gary 2014. ‘Trends in International Organization, 1950–2010’. Paper presented at the 55th Annual Convention of the ISA, Toronto, 26–29 March.Google Scholar

Mahoney, James 2000. ‘Path dependence in historical sociology’, Theory and Society 29(4): 507–548.Google Scholar

Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen A. 2009. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mayntz, Renate 2004. ‘Mechanisms in the analysis of social macro-phenomena’. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34(2): 237–259.Google Scholar

McCorquodale, Robert 2009. ‘International organisations and international human rights law: One giant leap for humankind’, in Kaikobad, and Bohlander, (eds.), International Law and Power: Perspectives on Legal Order and Justice. Essays in Honour of Colin Warbrick. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 141–162.Google Scholar

Merton, Robert K. 1968. ‘The Matthew effect in science’. Science 159(3810): 56–63.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew 2000. ‘The origins of human rights regimes: Democratic delegation in postwar Europe’. International Organization 54(2): 217–252.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew 2013. ‘Liberal theories of international law’, in Dunoff, and Pollack, (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations. The State of the Art. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 83–118.Google Scholar

Nullmeier, Frank, Biegon, Dominika, Nonhoff, Martin, Schmidtke, Henning and Schneider, Steffen (eds.) 2010. Prekäre Legitimitäten: Rechtfertigung von Herrschaft in der postnationalen Konstellation. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar

Nullmeier, Frank, Geis, Anna and Daase, Christopher 2012. ‘Der Aufstieg der Legitimitätspolitik. Rechtfertigung und Kritik politisch-ökonomischer Ordnungen’, in Geis, , Nullmeier, and Daase, (eds.) Der Aufstieg der Legitimitätspolitik, special issue, Leviathan 27: 11–38.Google Scholar

O’Neill, Jim 2001. ‘Building Better Global Economic BRICs’. Global Economics Paper No. 66, Goldman Sachs, New York, 30 November. www.goldmansachs.com/our-thinking/archive/archive-pdfs/build-better-brics.pdf (15 October 2015).Google Scholar

Page, Scott E. 2006. ‘Path dependence’. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1(1): 87–115.Google Scholar

Petersen, Roger D. 1999. ‘Mechanisms and structures in comparison’, in Bowen, and Petersen, (eds.), Critical Comparisons in Politics and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 61–77.Google Scholar

Pierson, Paul 2004. Politics in Time. History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Putnam, Robert D. 1988. ‘Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games’. International Organization 42(3): 427–460.Google Scholar

Reus-Smit, Christian 1999. The Moral Purpose of the State. Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Rixen, Thomas, Viola, Lora and Zürn, Michael (eds.) 2014. Historical Institutionalism and International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ruggie, John G. 1986. ‘Continuity and transformation in the world polity: Toward a neorealist synthesis’, in Keohane, (ed.), Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 131–157.Google Scholar

Rutherford, Kenneth R. 2000. ‘The evolving arms control agenda: Implications of the role of NGOS in banning antipersonnel landmines’, World Politics 53(1): 74–114.Google Scholar

Scharpf, Fritz 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2015. ‘Efficient process tracing. Analyzing the causal mechanisms of European integration’, in Bennett, and Checkel, (eds.), Process Tracing in the Social Sciences: From Metaphor to Analytical Tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 98–125.Google Scholar

Simmons, Beth A. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Simmons, Beth A., Dobbin, Frank and Garrett, Geoffrey 2008. The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie 2013. ‘International law and international relations theory: Twenty years later’, in Dunoff, and Pollack, (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations. The State of the Art. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 613–625.Google Scholar

Stone Sweet, Alec 2000. Governing with Judges. Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Strang, David and Meyer, John W. 1993. ‘Institutional conditions for diffusion’. Theory and Society 22(4): 487–511.Google Scholar

Suchman, Marc C. 1995. ‘Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches’. The Academy of Management Review 20(3): 571–610.Google Scholar

Tallberg, Jonas 2000. ‘Supranational influence in EU enforcement: The ECJ and the principle of state liability’. Journal of European Public Policy 7(1): 104–121.Google Scholar

Tallberg, Jonas, Sommerer, Thomas, Squatrito, Theresa and Jönsson, Christer 2013. The Opening Up of International Organizations: Transnational Access in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tamanaha, Brian Z. 2004. On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Teitel, Ruti G. 2011. Humanity’s Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

UN Secretary-General 1999. ‘Secretary-General’s Bulletin: Observance by United Nations Forces of International Humanitarian Law’. UN Doc. ST/SGB/1999/13, 6 August. www1.umn.edu/humanrts/instree/unobservance1999.pdf (15 October 2015).Google Scholar

UN Secretary-General 2003. ‘Secretary-General’s Bulletin: Special Measures for Protection from Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse’. UN Doc. ST/SGB/2003/13, 9 October. www.unhcr.org/405ac6614.html (15 October 2015).Google Scholar

Verdirame, Guglielmo 2011. The UN and Human Rights. Who Guards the Guardians? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Von Bernstorff, Jochen 2008. ‘Procedures of decision-making and the role of law in international organizations’. German Law Journal 9(11): 1939–1964.Google Scholar

Von Bogdandy, Armin 2013. ‘Prinzipien von Staat, supranationalen und internationalen Organisationen’, in Isensee, and Kirchhof, (eds.), Handbuch des Staatsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Vol. XI, Internationale Bezüge. 3rd edn. Heidelberg: C.F. Müller, pp. 275–304.Google Scholar

Von Bogdandy, Armin and Venzke, Ingo 2014. In Whose Name? A Public Law Theory of International Adjudication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Von Bogdandy, Armin, Wolfrum, Rüdiger, von Bernstorff, Jochen, Dann, Philipp and Goldmann, Matthias (eds.) 2010. The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions. Advancing International Institutional Law. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar

Warren, Mark E. 2014. ‘Accountability and democracy’, in Bovens, , Goodin, and Schillemans, (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 39–54.Google Scholar

Zürn, Michael 2000. ‘Democratic governance beyond the nation-state. The EU and other international institutions’. European Journal of International Relations 6(2): 183–221.Google Scholar

Zürn, Michael 2012. ‘Autorität und Legitimität in der postnationalen Konstellation’, in Geis, , Nullmeier, and Daase, (eds.), Der Aufstieg der Legitimitätspolitik. Rechtfertigung und Kritik politisch-ökonomischer Ordnungen, special issue, Leviathan 27: 41–62.Google Scholar

Zürn, Michael, Binder, Martin and Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias 2012. ‘International authority and its politicization’. International Theory 4(1): 69–106.Google Scholar

Zürn, Michael, Binder, Martin, Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias and Radtke, Katrin 2007. ‘Politische Ordnungsbildung wider Willen’. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 14 (1): 129–164.Google Scholar

Zürn, Michael, Binder, Martin, Keller, Xaver, Lockwood Payton, Autumn M. and Tokhi, Alexandros 2014. ‘International Authority Data Project’. Paper presented at the 55th Annual Convention of the ISA, Toronto, 26–29 March.Google Scholar

Zürn, Michael and Deitelhoff, Nicole. 2016 Internationale Beziehungen: Themen und Theorien. München: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar

Zürn, Michael and Stephen, Matthew 2010. ‘The view of old and new powers on the legitimacy of international institutions’. Politics 30: 91–101.Google Scholar